RE: [SA-list] Another SMTP2POP question

2004-04-30 Thread Steve Davis
Behalf Of Dirk BulinckxSent: 30 April 2004 14:26To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Another SMTP2POP question I understand the request but personaly I don't think that technicaly this is an easy one. Let me explain.   SMTP2POP3 in SMTP & POP3 mode:     you know the subject that you

RE: [SA-list] Another SMTP2POP question

2004-04-30 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve DavisSent: Friday, April 30, 2004 2:17 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SA-list] Another SMTP2POP question Hi,   I've just started using this to test a number of different internal relays and mail systems. One thing I've found is that the PO

RE: [SA-list] Another SMTP2POP question

2004-04-30 Thread Steve Davis
Steve DavisSent: Friday, April 30, 2004 2:17 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SA-list] Another SMTP2POP question Hi,   I've just started using this to test a number of different internal relays and mail systems. One thing I've found is that the POP3 check removes ALL of the SMTP2POP3 c

RE: [SA-list] Another SMTP2POP question

2004-04-30 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
sSent: Friday, April 30, 2004 2:17 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [SA-list] Another SMTP2POP question Hi,   I've just started using this to test a number of different internal relays and mail systems. One thing I've found is that the POP3 check removes ALL of the SMTP2POP3 check mails.  

[SA-list] Another SMTP2POP question

2004-04-30 Thread Steve Davis
Hi,   I've just started using this to test a number of different internal relays and mail systems. One thing I've found is that the POP3 check removes ALL of the SMTP2POP3 check mails.   I was hoping it would be clever enough to just remove the message it's looking for, not ALL of the test me