EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [SA-list] Trying to do an NT
process check
Eureka. I ran
EXCTRLST.EXE from the resource kit. The performance counter for perfproc was
disabled. I enabled it and
voila.
Sorry to waste so much
bandwidth.
Thanks for the
support.Steve
---
: Wednesday, August 27,
2003 12:33 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[SA-list] Trying to do an NT process check
Stephen,
Double check to make sure that you are authenticating
so that you can see all the processes on the machine.I check PCAnywhere as a service and a process on
various
properties .
John
-Original Message-From: Riley, Stephen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:40
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [SA-list] Trying
to do an NT process check
I
tried that, searching for the pcAnywhere process an
]Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 9:49
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Trying
to do an NT process check
Could you (for the test) enter manualy the name of a running process,
then run one cycle, BUT set a high timeout (something like
25).
What
does that give?
,
StephenSent: Tue Aug 26 9:53 PMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [SA-list] Trying to do an NT
process check
I'm
sorry, I should have stated, I tried both name and IP address, and get the
same error message. I tried on the same subnet, and on a different subnet
Title: Message
can
you see remote services on those hosts?
dirk.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Riley,
StephenSent: Tue Aug 26 9:53 PMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [SA-list] Trying to do an NT
process c
11:34
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SA-list] Trying
to do an NT process check
Try
to use the IP address instead of the name.
dirk.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Riley,
StephenSent: Tue Aug 26 5:01
Title: Message
Try to
use the IP address instead of the name.
dirk.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Riley,
StephenSent: Tue Aug 26 5:01 PMTo:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: [SA-list] Trying to do an NT process
Title: Message
I have
tried this using version 4.0.1376 running on Windows NT 4.0 SP6a Server and also
running version 4.0.1490 running on Windows 2000 Professional
SP4.
If I
try to add a check for an NT process it works fine if I select an NT 4.0
machine, but if I chose a Windows 2000 ma
