ED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 3:08 PM
Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list] change in state
>
> I hear ya... But who said you would be "suppressing alerts"?? I'm not
> asking for that, I'm asking that duplicate alerts, based on SA being
> stopped for what
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list] change in state
If it's running slow, why not just pause the checks? If it's slow when the
checks are paused, then it's not SA, it's your machine, and it's time to
upgrade that 386sx16. ;-)
--
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list] change in state
OK, I'll certainly try that... But sometimes the interface is slow slow
making changes while it's running is brutal. And
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
u> cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list] change
in state
he Seven Dials
I don't pay taxes 'cuz I never file
I don't do bidness that don't make me smile
I like my aeroplane 'cuz she's got style"
Jimmy Buffett, Treetop Flyer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf
pay taxes 'cuz I never file
I don't do bidness that don't make me smile
I like my aeroplane 'cuz she's got style"
Jimmy Buffett, Treetop Flyer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
04 4:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list] change in state
I hear ya... But who said you would be "suppressing alerts"?? I'm not
asking for that, I'm asking that duplicate alerts, based on SA being
stopped for whatever reason (good, bad, ugly, or i
.com>cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list] change
in state
ld want \ expect the alerts
to re-generate.
Jesse.
-Original Message-
From: Brent Ozar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, September 04, 2003 9:52 AM
Posted To: Servers Alive mailing list
Conversation: [5] RE: [SA-list] change in state
Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list] change in
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 8:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list] change in state
That's a good idea, but I don't think the "right" way to fix the problem...
I'm just trying to su
ECTED]
Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list] change in state
That's a good idea, but I don't think the "right" way to fix the problem...
I'm just trying to suggest "big boy" features for the SA product
Imaging if a Tivoli or Network Node Manager from HP ran like
Sent by: Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list] change
in state
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
an option
where you can start ServersAlive as a service that way by default?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 8:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list] change in state
cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list] change
in state
Of Jason
PassowSent: Wed Sep 03 10:56 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list] change in
state
The problem is…. how does SA know that you knew that
it was still down.
Perhaps you are doing maintenance from afar (using
vnc or term serv) and reboot
I
suppose that an alert 'action' that would puts an entry into maintenance would
help?
dirk.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jason
PassowSent: Wed Sep 03 10:56 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [5] RE: [SA-list]
The problem is…. how does SA know that you knew that it was still
down.
Perhaps you are doing maintenance from afar (using vnc or term serv) and
reboot the server. When it comes up you have assumed (which I am sure no one on this list would do)
it is fixed and did not get an alert le
17 matches
Mail list logo
