: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Agent based check (what OS should we support?)
Ah, now I understand (and in fact now I remember you said that ages ago).
Ironically that's less useful to me, although I could still use it behind our
DMZ.
18854
"Dirk Bulinckx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Servers Alive Discussion List
01/02/2007 09:35 Please respond to
Servers Alive Discussion List
To Servers Alive Discussion List cc Subject RE: [SA-list]
Agent based check (what OS should we support?)
The initial idea
Please respond to
Servers Alive Discussion List
To Servers Alive Discussion List cc Subject RE: [SA-list]
Agent based check (what OS should we support?)
and can't you access that remote service using the sn
scussion List
To Servers Alive Discussion List cc Subject RE: [SA-list]
Agent based check (what OS should we support?)
and can't you access that remote service using the snmp protocol?
Dirk Bulinckx.
2007 9:56 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: RE: [SA-list] Agent based check (what OS should we support?)
OK, I can live without database. However the more I consider it, the more I
realise that SNMP checking is really important. To explain: our typical
scenario is that we have serve
Support
Tel: +44 1236 502661
Mob: +44 7881 518854
"Dirk Bulinckx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: Servers Alive Discussion List
01/02/2007 08:45 Please respond to
Servers Alive Discussion List
To Servers Alive Discussion List cc Subject RE: [SA-list]
Agent based check (w
Bulinckx.
From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 9:26 AM
To: Servers Alive Discussion List
Subject: Re: [SA-list] Agent based check
Win32 is actually the critical one for us. (Is that agent available? Are you
looking for beta testers, Dirk?) I'd want it to do all the existing Windows
checks - process, service, perfmon, diskspace, plus database stuff. Ideally it
would do SNMP too - to check for example a non-networked UPS co
