RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

2011-12-20 Thread Vogl, Tom
Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 3:31 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Latency check? I can see that for some type of checks a new status could be usefull…HOWEVER based on how SA curently works I would

RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

2011-12-19 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
, December 19, 2011 9:46 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Latency check? I like this! You got my vote. J Thank you, anthony Laatz | appletree Answers p: 800.270.7030 f: 866.827.8802 e: ala...@appletreeanswers.com (mailto:ala...@appletreeanswers.com) From: Dirk

RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

2011-12-19 Thread Anthony Laatz
Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Latency check? I can see that for some type of checks a new status could be usefull…HOWEVER based on how SA curently works I would prefer a different approche. The status would still be UP or DOWN (or maintenance or …) but you could give a severity

RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

2011-12-19 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
nt: Monday, December 19, 2011 8:16 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Latency check? Close to down SHOULD be another check as it is another animal altogether. I think another status is opens a up a whole host of other discussions. Perhaps it is worth having those discussion

RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

2011-12-19 Thread Jason Passow
ould be CAUTION or something similar. I look forward to your response. Chris>> From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu)] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 10:46 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [S

RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

2011-12-19 Thread Chris Mang
our response. Chris>> From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Jason Passow Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 10:46 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Latency check? A whole new status for this seems a bit unnecessary. I have

RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

2011-12-19 Thread Jason Passow
u] Sent: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:30:26 -0600 Subject: RE: [SA-list] Latency check? Right on the money Chris. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu (mailto:salive@woodstone.nu)] On Behalf Of Chris Mang Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 7:31 AM To: Serv

RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

2011-12-19 Thread Heath Abbate
Right on the money Chris. -Original Message- From: Servers Alive Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Chris Mang Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 7:31 AM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Latency check? Dirk, I think I know what Heath is

RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

2011-12-19 Thread Chris Mang
ve Discussion List [mailto:salive@woodstone.nu] On Behalf Of Dirk Bulinckx Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2011 3:01 PM To: Servers Alive Discussion List Subject: RE: [SA-list] Latency check? That's how the ping check works. For example 1 second timeout 5 frames 100%

RE: [SA-list] Latency check?

2011-12-18 Thread Dirk Bulinckx
That's how the ping check works. For example 1 second timeout 5 frames 100% should response if one of the frames takes more then 200ms ->DOWN Dirk Bulinckx. Network Monitoring by Servers Alive - http://www.woodstone.nu DNS Hosting with ipv4 and ipv6 on http://