stone.nu
To
cc
Subject
RE: [SA-list] SNMP trap sending
With some changes to SA yesbut
currently not planned
(a custom change is always possible
although)
Dirk.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 20,
Please respond
tosalive@woodstone.nu
To
cc
Subject
RE: [SA-list] SNMP trap
sending
identifier 0, 1, or 2, as defined by
the "check" itself.
Does this sound like a possibility?
"Dirk Bulinckx"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/20/2005 12:05 PM
Please respond to
salive@woodstone.nu
To
cc
Subject
RE: [SA-list] SNMP t
and those levels how are they
determined?
Dirk.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 6:02
PMTo: salive@woodstone.nuSubject: [SA-list] SNMP trap
sending
When using a "SNMP trap" alert to
forward the check results o
