Re: Waterworks

1999-04-14 Thread David
Waterworks 1 and 2 belongs to Fred Publishing. David -Original Message- From: Robert Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Date: 14 April 1999 22:18 Subject: Waterworks >Who owns the copyright to Waterworks (and Waterworks II)? > >-- >Robert > > >

Re: ATOM / HDOS source (was Re: Hardwarehelp wanted!! Any ideas?)

1999-04-14 Thread David
That does not need to be the case! It is possible to add a simple change to the external version to allow the usage of the internal floppy... although who wants to use floppy as opposed to HD - except if, of course, you're doing a duplication run on the SAM. -Original Message- From: [EMAI

Waterworks

1999-04-14 Thread Robert Brady
Who owns the copyright to Waterworks (and Waterworks II)? -- Robert

Re: Hardwarehelp wanted!! Any ideas?

1999-04-14 Thread Gordon Wallis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 13 Apr 1999 17:55:11 +0200 Tue, 13 Apr 99 20:00:23 BST, Peder > Louring Laustsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The Q is: the DOS for the SD interface is not working (never has), I read > >in FORMAT magazine that the source code has been lost and will need to b

Re: Where can a REAL SAM be obtained from

1999-04-14 Thread Paul Walker
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Darren Wileman) Um. Darren, is there any way of getting rid of that vcard junk which seems to be tacked onto your messages at the moment? If so, please take it. :-) Paul -- Where is the human nature so weak as in the bookstore? -- Henry Ward Beecher

Updated SAM pages

1999-04-14 Thread Stewart Skardon
Hi folks, Long time no see. Things are pretty hectic around here at the moment, what with my new job (at last!) and social life. I've finally got around to giving my SAM pages a bit of an overhaul, and I've also started to add some new DSK images as well. As always, please a) let me know what y

Re: Hardwarehelp wanted!! Any ideas?

1999-04-14 Thread pseudobob
On Tue, 13 Apr 1999 17:55:11 +0200 Tue, 13 Apr 99 20:00:23 BST, Peder Louring Laustsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Q is: the DOS for the SD interface is not working (never has), I read >in FORMAT magazine that the source code has been lost and will need to be >rewritten Sh..!! Sam user

Re: Where can a REAL SAM be obtained from

1999-04-14 Thread Darren Wileman
-Original Message- From: Andrew Collier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no Date: 14 April 1999 12:14 Subject: Re: Where can a REAL SAM be obtained from >>Any ideas? > >Yes. > > Actually I'd try Bob Brenchley first. > Thanks for that >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Hmmm. That wasn't

Re: Where can a REAL SAM be obtained from

1999-04-14 Thread Lee Willis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Darren Wileman) writes: > Any ideas? > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm thinking of getting rid of mine, as it just seems to be gathering dust as I don't have much time at the moment and I'd rather it was doing some good somewhere ... Besides I'm moving house and I'm not convinced tha

RE: FS UK: SAM Coupe h/ware & s/ware

1999-04-14 Thread matthew . gallagher
Hmm, let's try that again shall we? Sam Elite (Latest version of Sam Coupe - 2 intl disk drives, 512k intl RAM, intl printer i/face)?85 1 meg Extl RAM ?38 SD hard drive I/face & 80 meg hd?28 Mouse I/face & mouse?11 Lemmings & Oh no more Lemmings ?13 Elite

FS UK: SAM Coupe h/ware & s/ware

1999-04-14 Thread matthew . gallagher
<<...>> I think they're reasonable prices (but then I would wouldn't I!) but I'm open to negotiation. E mail if interested...

Re: Where can a REAL SAM be obtained from

1999-04-14 Thread Andrew Collier
>Any ideas? Yes. Actually I'd try Bob Brenchley first. >[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hmmm. That wasn't the From: address, and the given name was Darren. >Attachment converted: Scratch:Comrac Limited.vcf (TEXT/ttxt) (18D0) Thanks for that. Just what I always wanted. Andrew -- | Andrew Collier | e

Re: ATOM / HDOS source (was Re: Hardwarehelp wanted!! Any ideas?)

1999-04-14 Thread stefan.drissen
David L wrote: >>I shall politely refrain from comment over the 'loss' of the SD >>interface DOS source code... > >In all fairness, I do feel sorry for Nev for the loss of his hardwork - >after all it is the same chap who then later relented and said how wonderful >the Atom was!!! Did I ever menti