Re: Putting the whole boring argumet simply

1999-04-29 Thread Andrew Collier
>> And Linux? I mean, however it is you decide to shove the data out of the >> speakers... somewhere in the middle your code will be producing a sound >> sample, will it? > >Yup -- or rather, Dave's code will be. I'm just writing glue :) Fairy 'nuff then. >... or sniffing it... or something... H

Re: Putting the whole boring argumet simply

1999-04-29 Thread Simon Cooke
> And Linux? I mean, however it is you decide to shove the data out of the > speakers... somewhere in the middle your code will be producing a sound > sample, will it? Yup -- or rather, Dave's code will be. I'm just writing glue :) ... or sniffing it... or something... Simon (NSFMSFT)

Re: Putting the whole boring argumet simply

1999-04-29 Thread Andrew Collier
>> Are they/you working on support for generic DSP devices, or still just the >> SoundBlaster hardware? I was about to start writing a generic one myself >> actually, but if it is already being done then there's no need for me to >> bother... > >Actually, the plan is to go through the Windows Multi

Re: Putting the whole boring argumet simply

1999-04-29 Thread Gordon Wallis
Chris Pile wrote: > ...I developed Defender on the PC using the following tools: > > Editor: Borlands' BRIEF. Which is great as it uses the hard-disk as virtual > RAM, so your source can be almost any length. > Oh, god... How I *love* BRIEF. The most fantastic text-editor for fiddling with Post

Re: Putting the whole boring argumet simply

1999-04-29 Thread Simon Cooke
> Are they/you working on support for generic DSP devices, or still just the > SoundBlaster hardware? I was about to start writing a generic one myself > actually, but if it is already being done then there's no need for me to > bother... Actually, the plan is to go through the Windows Multimedia

RE: Putting the whole boring argumet simply

1999-04-29 Thread Andrew Collier
At 3:15 pm +0100 29/4/99, Si Owen wrote: >Chris Pile wrote: >> When Si completes his Windows port (complete with sound and >> accurate timing!!!) > >Well, it's not me that's writing that part of it - Dave Hooper, Aley Keprt >and Simon Cooke are involved with the sound side of things. Are they/you

RE: Sam Juggler (Re: SimCoupe & protected disks)

1999-04-29 Thread Si Owen
Andrew Collier wrote: > MNEMOdemo1 part 2 (my bit) crashes. I never did manage to work out exactly > why, but I rather suspect it has to do with interrupt timings. I've corrected the interrupt timings (as discovered Ian or yourself) so the interrupt bits aren't visible during the last 3us of the i

RE: Putting the whole boring argumet simply

1999-04-29 Thread Si Owen
Chris Pile wrote: > When Si completes his Windows port (complete with sound and > accurate timing!!!) Well, it's not me that's writing that part of it - Dave Hooper, Aley Keprt and Simon Cooke are involved with the sound side of things. Accurate timing will probably come in time, but probably at

Re: Putting the whole boring argumet simply

1999-04-29 Thread Chris Pile
>Funnily enough, that's EXACTLY what I've been wanting to do >lately. I've got so many things I want to do for the SAM, >but developing them on the SAM itself, as I find, is so >bloody time-consuming! > >[cycle begin] > boot up Pro-DOS. > edit assembler/C program in text editer (ZDE) > assemb

RE: Putting the whole boring argumet simply

1999-04-29 Thread Justin Skists
>And to counter that argument, if people could develop on SIM Coupe >and then write the4 software back to floppy for distrubiton on >standard SAM's then I think we would see more released on the SAM. >What would you rather do - roam through your atic blowing the dust >off your SAM and setting i

RE: Source of technical information

1999-04-29 Thread Justin Skists
>> BTW - will be in touch via work tomorrow other that other matter for >> u ;) > >I've seen it al now - David Ledbury the pimp. >;-) *laugh* It's innocent, I tell you!! Jut.

Re: Putting the whole boring argumet simply

1999-04-29 Thread Psycho Billy
> If the only Sams being used are virtual then probably less software > will be produced. Why write software for a virtual Sam as hardly > anyone will use it or need to use it as anything the VR Sam can do > the machine they are running it on can do and faster. This would be a problem if there was

Re: Source of technical information

1999-04-29 Thread Psycho Billy
> Blitz 9 - should be being proofread as we speak. > > Don't know about the subs... will check out for u. > > BTW - will be in touch via work tomorrow other that other matter for > u ;) I've seen it al now - David Ledbury the pimp. ;-) Peace, Love, Kisses... JohnnaPig Teare JPOL: http://johnna