On Sun, 07 Jul 2002 11:30:36 +0200, Frans van Egmond
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think a lower resolution would be a bad idea...
> Keep them the way they are now...
> Will you be doing the whole tech manual at some point, perhaps as a Pdf ?
> Thanks.
>
Well If I can find the time I can scan it
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 09:20:35 +0100 , "Winkless, Geoff"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nev Young wrote:
> > they're about 3000 x 2000 pixels and the jpegs are 440K - 825K.
> > I can try and redo them at lower resolution but I'm scanning from the
> > tech manual and it's a poor photo copy to start wi
Nev Young wrote:
> they're about 3000 x 2000 pixels and the jpegs are 440K - 825K.
> I can try and redo them at lower resolution but I'm scanning from the
> tech manual and it's a poor photo copy to start with.
JPEG for line drawings? Yeuck.
Scan them in, run them through some line routines in
I think a lower resolution would be a bad idea...
Keep them the way they are now...
Will you be doing the whole tech manual at some point, perhaps as a Pdf ?
Thanks.
Frans
Nev Young wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jul 2002 19:29:11 +0200, Frans van Egmond
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Absolutel
On Sat, 06 Jul 2002 19:29:11 +0200, Frans van Egmond
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Absolutely, what size did you scan them in?
>
they're about 3000 x 2000 pixels and the jpegs are 440K - 825K.
I can try and redo them at lower resolution but I'm scanning from the
tech manual and it's a poor photo
Absolutely, what size did you scan them in?
Frans
Nev Young wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 11:08:17 +0100, "Stewart Skardon"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Guess this is a prompt for me to make a rare appearance on the list!
That's right, my site is now based at www.sskardon.fsnet.co.uk
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 11:08:17 +0100, "Stewart Skardon"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guess this is a prompt for me to make a rare appearance on the list!
>
> That's right, my site is now based at www.sskardon.fsnet.co.uk, but
> www.sam-coupe.co.uk is the url I always quote as I think it's slightly
>
ny changes or
additional information to add would be welcomed.
Hope everyone is keeping well!
Regards,
Stewart
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Tim P
Sent: 06 July 2002 09:15
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: Re: error 404
> fo
> found that http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/sskardon is no longer valid.
Guessing that means Stewart Skardon, I've currently linked to:
http://www.sskardon.fsnet.co.uk/
(which is probably the "real" location of www.sam-coupe.co.uk, not to be
confused with www.samcoupe.co.uk or www.samcoupe.com).
