On Tue, 6 Jul 1999 20:51:23 +0100 Wed, 7 Jul 99 20:02:34 BST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>| >I think it is MasterDOS that needs a patch.
>|
>| Waste of time anyway. Who the hell would want to use that crap in this
>| day and age?
>
>Are we talking MasterDos or Secretary?
The Secretary. Do you th
| On Sat, 3 Jul 1999 16:30:22 +0100 Sat, 3 Jul 99 17:04:50 BST,
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| >
| >
| >
| >| Has anyone got a fix for the Secretary wordprocessor to make understand the
| >| year 2000
| >
| >
| >I think it is MasterDOS that needs a patch.
|
| Waste of time anyway. Who the hell
On Sat, 3 Jul 1999 16:30:22 +0100 Sat, 3 Jul 99 17:04:50 BST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
>| Has anyone got a fix for the Secretary wordprocessor to make understand the
>| year 2000
>
>
>I think it is MasterDOS that needs a patch.
Waste of time anyway. Who the hell would want to use that crap
| Has anyone got a fix for the Secretary wordprocessor to make understand the
| year 2000
I think it is MasterDOS that needs a patch.
--
Samsboss - The One And Only.
Accept No Others.
Has anyone got a fix for the Secretary wordprocessor to make understand the
year 2000
