Re: Vortex Assembler - Update

1999-09-22 Thread Simon Cooke
> Back in March, Si Cooke wrote: > > Well, the assembler is proceeding apace... features so far include: > > > Was it ever finished? If not, is it still being worked on at all? Currently, no - I'm trying to write some software for MSNBC so that I can pay the rent on the 1st of October.. my visa

Re: Vortex Assembler - Update

1999-09-22 Thread Si Owen
Back in March, Si Cooke wrote: > Well, the assembler is proceeding apace... features so far include: Was it ever finished? If not, is it still being worked on at all? Si ICQ: 9769343, Homepage: http://www.obobo.demon.co.uk/

RE: Vortex Assembler - Update

1999-03-16 Thread Si Owen
Hi Si, All looks superb, I didn't think quite so much had been done or thought about! > Flag Equates: > LMPR: EQUF 7 : WPROT, 6 : ROM1, 5 : ROM0 Could it be: WPROT : 7 etc. instead or as well? It seems to read easier to me, and also matches the C bit-field syntax, which is a similar thing (

RE: Vortex Assembler - Update

1999-03-16 Thread Justin Skists
> From: Simon Cooke (Exchange) [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Flag Equates: Wow... I like that idea! >- > >Data defines: > >DEFB - define series of byte values >DEFW - define series of word values >DEFF - define series of floating point/fixed point values Can I reques

Vortex Assembler - Update

1999-03-15 Thread Simon Cooke (Exchange)
Well, the assembler is proceeding apace... features so far include: Flag Equates: Flags are local to labels, but each flag must be named uniquely. You can have more than one flag name per bit position though. eg. Say you're setting up the LMPR register for use later. You can set up the flags at