On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 03:39:14PM +, Eric Belhomme wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] ecrivait dans le message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Definitely a kernel bug or a hardware bug. I would suggest upgrading
to the latest kernel in whichever (2.2,2.4) series
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It's a kernel bug. The fact that it happens with these different
kernels means it's a generic kernel bug that is currently unfixed.
*Nothing* smbd does should cause a kernel panic, unless we're
overwriting /dev/kmem. I
Hi All:
I have scoured the archives and done a Google search with
no answers. I set up Samba on Redhat 7.2 Samba 2.2.1a-4 on a
friends network. He is running 2 Windows 98 machines. They can't
browse network neighbourhood. Sometimes rebooting the machines
will fix it temporarily. Shutting
Message: 21
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 22:20:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Urban Widmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Marano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Samba] How to automate SMBMNT
On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Michael Marano wrote:
I have a tangential question based upon
Hi Nir,
I think the password changing is initiated by the client. Perhaps these
two articles from MS knowledge base are of interest:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q154501
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q154501
I hope this helps,
Wolfi
On
Could anyone help me? I can't configure my samba. I work on RH 7.3, KDE
3.0, kernel 2.4.18-10.
When I'd like to use smbclient I've got message:
tdb_open_ex: could not open file /var/cache/samba/unexpected.tdb: No
such file or directory
What should I do?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
Freitag den 27.09.2002 um 15:31 CEST +0200, schrieb peter wagner:
HALLO,
HOW IT IS POSSIBLE TO ACCESS FROM A DOS-BOOTDISK (VER.7.0) RUNNING ON
A WINDOWS95-MACHINE TO A SAMBA-SERVER (WITHOUT STARTING
WINDOWS). IF WIN95 IS RUNNING THE CONNECTION WITH THE SAMBA-
NETWORK SERVER IS OK.
On Friday 27 September 2002 08:31 am, peter wagner wrote:
HALLO,
HOW IT IS POSSIBLE TO ACCESS FROM A DOS-BOOTDISK (VER.7.0) RUNNING ON
A WINDOWS95-MACHINE TO A SAMBA-SERVER (WITHOUT STARTING
WINDOWS). IF WIN95 IS RUNNING THE CONNECTION WITH THE SAMBA-
NETWORK SERVER IS OK. (MS-NETWARE CLIENT
Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:08:49PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote about
'[Samba] Bag in 3.0alpha20 downloaded via CVS':
In file ../src/utils/smbgroupedit.c
symbol ';' not exist in end of 56'th line.
Compiles fine here... update cvs and try again..
I think this
Hi
I'm trying to get samba fileserver going on a RedHat 7.2 box. This what I get
when test with smbclient.
[root@woody samba]# smbclient '\\woody\Test\'
added interface ip=192.168.7.31 bcast=192.168.7.255
nmask=255.255.255.0
session request to
WOODY failed (Not listening for
for your answers to my questions
Stephan Helas
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Freitag den 27.09.2002 um 16:21 CEST +0200, schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi
I'm trying to get samba fileserver going on a RedHat 7.2 box. This what I
get when test with smbclient.
[root@woody samba]# smbclient '\\woody\Test\'
^^ ^^
It's a
We recently migrated our PDC away
from Microsoft to SAMBA and have nearly completed the migration except for 1
little annoyance. Our SNAP server is
unable to view the users on the SAMBA PDC.
I have RTFMs, googled
for awhile, and Ive called quantum tech support with no luck. Is there some
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 03:17:04PM +0200, Grzegorz Madajczak wrote about '[Samba]
Problem with samba':
Could anyone help me? I can't configure my samba. I work on RH 7.3, KDE
3.0, kernel 2.4.18-10.
When I'd like to use smbclient I've got message:
tdb_open_ex: could not open file
Gentlemen,
First, I want to thank all those who helped me figure out my problem.
Installation is FreeBSD 4.6.2;
A standard installation of cups, followed by an immediate upgrade refused
to install properly. A direct install of the latest version from the ports
collection (on 3rd clean install
I'm trying to set up Samba 2.2.3a as a logon server for my Win2k/XP network.
But when I try to join the domain with a XP Professional client (the
SignOrSeal-Patch is installed, the other option in the management console is
also set up) I get the error message Login failed: unkown user name or
Guru's, I humbly ask you for help.
I ran into a problem in which I cannot find the reason/fix.
System:
redhat 7.3
samba 2.2.5 --withldapsam
nss_ldap configured to route the Unix UID/GID from same LDAP server.
It is running well and am able to authenticate off the LDAP servers. One
problem I am
Hello everyone,
I am running Compaq/Dec Unix 4.0e with samba 2.0.0-beta1. The shares
are being used for Lotus Domino 5.0, and every now and then we are getting
file I/O errors and the mail files are getting corrupted. Has anyone seen
this before or knows where I can go to get some
Hello
Here is my problem.
I have a PDC samba on a server and i need to move it onto
another server. I have tried copy all files /etc/samba/private
to my new server but it doesn't seems to work :-(
What's wrong ?
Is there a special procedure or a limitation to achieve this ?
Thanks a lot to help
I have a samba share
set up for 3 engineers. The software they are using on w2k clients is
solidworks. It is a modelling program that uses sometimes hundreds of
files at once, and these files have to be shared. Occasionally the
solidworks program will crash with an unhandled error. The
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 10:50, David Morel wrote:
Le jeu 26/09/2002 à 14:47, Benjamin Weber a écrit :
Ok, as some of you read I was the guy who experimented with SOCKET options.
In my last post, where I figured that I needed to use the right syntax I
found out that SO_SNDBUF=4096 and
Yep I am using large readwrite=yes as it is set on by default. That might
have anything to do with it?
--
Benjamin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Im
Auftrag von Chris Smith
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. September 2002 19:05
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 13:24, Benjamin Weber wrote:
Yep I am using large readwrite=yes as it is set on by default. That might
have anything to do with it?
Not sure. I didn't think that was the default, maybe I'm mistaken or
that it changed at a certain release.
--
To unsubscribe from this
What happen if u type smbclient -Lwoody
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: Hi
I'm trying to get samba fileserver going on a RedHat
7.2 box. This what I
get when test with smbclient.
[root@woody samba]# smbclient '\\woody\Test\'
added interface ip=192.168.7.31 bcast=192.168.7.255
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 13:24, Benjamin Weber wrote:
Yep I am using large readwrite=yes as it is set on by default. That might
have anything to do with it?
Just checked my docs for 2.2.5 claim that the default is large
readwrite = no. Maybe it's just the way your distribution set up the
After a brief stint offlist (thanks Bradley), I'm closer to getting
SMB/LDAP working but now am encountering something very odd, which he
suggested I bring back to the list for further evaluation. :-)
$ smbclient //TESTBOX/testshare -U dballing
added interface ip=10.15.49.142
Hy Samba-specialists
On my Suse 8.0 Machine with Samba 2.2.3a I've the
following Problem:
When I have a connection to the Server from a
Windows Client (NT / 2000)
the connection to the server is breaking after a
few minutes.
It is not possible to work with files on the server
or to copy
anyone know if the master browser can send only list of the ip and the netbios name
and don't send the shares of the LAN...
Thanks for you futur answer.
The goal of this solution is to hidde the shares in the LAN..
Destroy Dav
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 09:07:49PM +0100, Destroy Dav wrote:
The goal of this solution is to hidde the shares in the LAN..
Will hidden shares work?
[hiddenshare$]
path=/path/to/files
etc
etc
--
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
My samba help file says:
large readwrite (G)
This parameter determines wheather or not smbd supports [...].
[...]
Can improve performance by 10% with Windows 2000 clients. Defaults to on.
Not as tested as some other Samba code paths.
Default: large readwrite=yes
I am
Hi,
I´m worried about a strange behave of smbpasswd.
It´s doubling the response of the command. When I change a password it gives me
this answer:
[root@srv03 /]# smbpasswd testNew SMB
password:Retype new SMB password:Password changed for user
test.Password changed for user test.
I´m user
Although I've been using Samba with Linux and Windows 9x for some time,
now I need to deal with integrating Windows 2000 workstations into the
mix and I'm having a lot of aggravation with user profiles. I don't
know if this trouble is specific to Samba or whether it's another This
behavior is by
Hi,
I'm using samba-2.2.5 and I found, when user executed mistakenly
nmblookup -A GROUPNAME instead of nmblookup -A HOSTNAME, he receives
same result as nmblookup -A localhost, but with 0.0.0.0 as an ip
address:
$ nmblookup -A KNIHOVNA-CH
Looking up status of 0.0.0.0
PF-I400 00
Hi,
when trying to configure my samba server, I was curious if there's any
Domain controller running on our subnet. I could only find notes in
documentation of samba, that there has to be only one Domain Controller
running, otherwise weird things would happen ... Btw what are those weird
--On Saturday, September 28, 2002 12:51 AM +0200 Martin MOKREJ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
when trying to configure my samba server, I was curious if there's any
Domain controller running on our subnet. I could only find notes in
documentation of samba, that there has to be only one
Hi everyone,
Trying to copy a 3.5MB file from a Windows 2000 workstation to a FreeBSD
4.6.2 server running samba-2.2.6.p2. The 3.5MB file is an MS Access file
called MoldFE.mdb. After a few seconds of copying the file, a message box
pops up on the W2K workstation that states Cannot copy
man smb.conf
/ oplocks
Essentially, turn off oplocks.
Joel
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 06:33:29PM -0700, Sean Noonan wrote:
Hi everyone,
Trying to copy a 3.5MB file from a Windows 2000 workstation to a FreeBSD
4.6.2 server running samba-2.2.6.p2. The 3.5MB file is an MS Access file
Joel,
Added oplocks = no to the smb.conf file under [rootpart] service definition.
Same error message occured. Ran testparm for the heck of it and it told me
that I couldn't have oplocks = no and level2 oplocks = yes. So I changed
level2 oplocks to no, too. _Still_ get same error message
Hello-
with alpha20 I'm getting the ADS support not compiled in error when
trying to do 'net ads join'. I double checked everything before doing
the make.
I'm no hacker, but i sniffed around in the code and discovered that
configure is putting '#define WITH_ADS 1' into includes/config.h and all
How can you get an oplock error when you have turned off oplocks?
Getting the same error message is even stranger.
Are you are editing the right smb.conf file? If you installed
samba from sources on top of a prevous installation, there might be more
than one copy of smb.conf on your machine.
Vielen Dank für Ihre e-mail.
Da ich vom 30.09.-06.10 in Urlaub bin, kann ich sie leider erst danach bearbeiten bzw.
beantworten.
In dringenden Fällen, können Sie sich gerne an meinen Kollegen Herrn Lamotte wenden.
Er hat die email-Adresse [EMAIL PROTECTED] und ist telefonisch unter
Well, not sure what is causing that problem. Post the appropriate parts of
the samba log file, maybe some guru will see some clues in it.
BTW, if you just want to transfer a few big files, ftp works fine.
Joel
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 09:41:07PM -0700, Sean Noonan wrote:
Ok, some clarification.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, the really nasty bit about this is the implict mapping of existing
unix accounts to rids. I went to a lot of effor to try and get rid of
it - but the best I could do was hide it under a pile of interfaces and
pretend it wasn't there ;-)
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:14:39PM +0200, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
and tdbsam should be the default passdb backend in 3.0. We should remove
the smbpasswd file and provide a migration script.
Oh, this is radical. But it would make a *LOT* of stuff easier. Not sure if I
really like that. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK, the really nasty bit about this is the implict mapping of existing
unix accounts to rids. I went to a lot of effor to try and get rid of
it - but the best I could do was hide it under a pile of interfaces and
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:14:39PM +0200, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
and tdbsam should be the default passdb backend in 3.0. We should remove
the smbpasswd file and provide a migration script.
Oh, this is radical. But it would make a *LOT* of stuff easier. Not
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 05:29:32PM +1000, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
We actually have all this already. Jelmer has an XML passdb backend,
and pdbedit -i and -e do the rest.
So samba finally becomes buzzword-compliant :-)
We should then better not have XML in the examples subdirectory.
Volker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
pdb_smbpasswd and pdb_unixsam both use the code in passdb.c
(pdb_fill_sam_pw()) to construct their SAM_ACCOUNT, and to do uid-sid
mapping. In fact, becouse of this, smbpasswd already uses the gid code
to determine the primary group RID on the
At 18:27 26.09.2002 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
Hi all!
What kind of a value is the acct_ctrl argument of
context_sam_enum_accounts supposed to be?
It should be possible to list all accounts, that's why the current
implementation isn't very usable...
list all accounts withacct_ctrl =
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 03:53, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
I honestly doubt tdbsam is sufficiently stable for use as a default. I
think we need that kind of backend, but given it's extremly limited
testing, it worries me. Yes, this is circular dependency.
I haven't had an extensive test setup
Simo Sorce wrote:
And in my honest opinion we should get out the possibility to have
multiple backends active at the same time, I really think that move has
put us back 6 months in development and has caused more problems than
what the pros get with such a monster.
I still don't see where
It seem easy, but that prevented (at least in my case) to make the
system better.
The way we use multiple module in passdb is subtly broken and exposes us
to inconsistency and a lot of races.
and is not nice to have races in the users database.
the sam initially made a sane route and we also
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 10:16:28AM +0200, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote about 'Re:
acct_ctrl in context_sam_enum_accounts':
At 18:27 26.09.2002 +0200, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
Hi all!
What kind of a value is the acct_ctrl argument of
context_sam_enum_accounts supposed to be?
It should be
Hi again.
My faux pas; I used the HEAD branch, which was not correct. So I tried
the 3_0 branch and it has compiled successfully as it should... The
documentation on the web site regarding CVS did not list the 3_0 branch
;~{
--
James Bowes,
Senior Systems Consultant, Xisit
Ph: 604-535-6508
Here's a link to the patch that aliguori wrote and I cleaned up to respond
to the connectionless ldap v3 requests for netlogon info.
http://www-124.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/patches/?patch_id=540
I'm not so sure this belongs in nmbd, because once we respond to these,
win2k clients send
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 08:08:59AM -0700, James Bowes wrote about 'CVS update for
alpha release - update':
Hi again.
My faux pas; I used the HEAD branch, which was not correct.
What wasn't correct about it ?
Jelmer
Hello everyone,
Following the discussions on this list, I am getting a little confused now.
Which configure string do I have to use when I want to setup Samba on a
RedHat 7.0 system with ldap?
What I have done so far is:
Downloaded samba from cvs.
,/configure --sbindir=/usr/local/samba/bin
Anyone experience when the key hide unreadable = yes, where
the user goes to create a directory and it prompts with
(you may not be able to access the files created in \\server\share) do you want to continue.
I am using Windows 2000 Sp3, when I create a file it does
not do this. There
Quick comments:
s/objectSID/domainSid/ -- the netlogon attribute does not conform
to the the Active Directory schema.
Also, LDAP attributes are case-insensitive; don't use memcmp().
-- Luke
From: Jim McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: nmbd cldap patch
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27
Date: Fri Sep 27 16:43:33 2002
Author: jelmer
Update of /home/cvs/samba/docs/docbook
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv28154/docs/docbook
Modified Files:
Tag: SAMBA_3_0
docbook.txt global.ent
Log Message:
Apply Vance Lankhaars' cifs2002 documentation patch - mostly
Date: Sat Sep 28 03:38:37 2002
Author: sharpe
Update of /data/cvs/samba/source/client
In directory dp.samba.org:/tmp/cvs-serv6236/client
Modified Files:
client.c
Log Message:
Commit a fix to smbclient so that it will connect to EMCs and NetApp's machines.
Revisions:
client.c
61 matches
Mail list logo
