Because of the enormous amount of traffic being generated by Windows
viruses[0] I have turned on Mailman attachment filtering on the
high-traffic samba.org lists.
Lists will now pass only text/plain MIME parts through to the list.
multipart/alternative messages with both text and html forms will h
Further to comments made in another thread, Samba 2.2.7a appears to
limit the maximum number of Unix groups a user can have to 13
(NGROUPS_MAX - 3.)
The cause appears to be Samba adding to the groups list returned
by the getgroups() system call, such that a subsequent setgroups()
call has the numb
On Monday 27 January 2003 16:30, Michael Heironimus wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:46:10PM -0800, Daniel Fenwick wrote:
> > The better solution is to block attachments to the list. That eliminates
> > almost all viruses as well as all the other junk that floats around in
> > attachments.
>
>
Hi all,
after installing samba 2.2.5 (on Solaris8 running NIS+) it is not
possible to create user entries in smbpasswd.
I generated the smbpasswd file by
# cat /dev/null | /samba/samba-2.2.5/source/script/mksmbpasswd.sh >
/usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd
-
without starting samba daemons I
thanks alot for your help
but the problem still exists.
when I add the line:
wins server = 81.31.169.51
in my smb.conf the 'nmb' does not restart
somebody told me that this line makes your server a samba client and
'nmb' does not permit being samba server and client...
anywhere... as I said my sam
Greetings,
***Warning: New to compiling and use RPMs whenever I can :-)***
When trying to compile I get the above error. It is preceded by:
===
.
.
.
Compiling nsswitch/pam_winbind.c with -fPIC
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:60: parse error before `*'
nsswitch/pam_winbind.c: In function `converse'
Hi, another swat problem
get always conncetion refused message
my httpd demon is working fine over the win 2000 network
when i do the status thing and netparm everything is fine
even created the swat file and checked for the tcp 901 thing in the servie
file
any clue
--
To unsubscribe from this
John,
thanks for your help thus far.
I switched switches that the PDC is plugged into and it almost had me
believing that it worked, I managed to log in three times in quick
succession and each time it executed the netlogon script.
Alas, inconsistency reared its ugly head once more and now I eith
Hi all,
after installing samba 2.2.5 (on Solaris8 running NIS+) it is not
possible to create user entries in smbpasswd.
I generated the smbpasswd file by
# cat /dev/null | /samba/samba-2.2.5/source/script/mksmbpasswd.sh >
/usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd
-
then tried to create user entry "
Ok got the access problems solved, thanks to
everyone who replied. Now though a new problem has arisen and I have
not been able to find a solution or even what the problem could be besides a
duplicate host. I am trying to get access to the shares from a WinXP Pro
client. Everytime I try t
On Jan 27, 10:33, Ben Scarbeau wrote:
> Subject: [Samba] more info - NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED opening remote file
>
> Thanks to those who had suggestions on my last post, but none of those
> seems to have worked. I have narrowed down the problem a bit though,
> seems users can't write to a share th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there a place that has all the options that you can add to the
> smb.conf file in verion 3. How to set up as a domain controller and how
> the acl's work. The documentation for verion 2.x on the samb
> > The better solution is to block attachments to the list. That
eliminates
> > almost all viruses as well as all the other junk that floats around in
> > attachments.
>
> why not just run a virus scanner on the mail server which runs this
list...
The problem with trusting a virus scanner is tha
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:46:10PM -0800, Daniel Fenwick wrote:
> > The better solution is to block attachments to the list. That
eliminates
> > almost all viruses as well as all the other junk that floats around in
> > attachments.
>
> Except that then people couldn't attach copies of log files
Am Dienstag, 28. Januar 2003 00:46 schrieb Daniel Fenwick:
> > > Would someone please do the list a favor and remove the infected user
>
> from
>
> > > the mailing list?
> >
> > We're working on it.
>
> The better solution is to block attachments to the list. That eliminates
> almost all viruses a
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 03:46:10PM -0800, Daniel Fenwick wrote:
> The better solution is to block attachments to the list. That eliminates
> almost all viruses as well as all the other junk that floats around in
> attachments.
Except that then people couldn't attach copies of log files when they
Due to FreeBSD not allowing '$' in usernames, and because I have to add
a machine account for each computer I add to my Samba domain, what can I
do to try and accomplish the following?
1. Automate FreeBSD to allow me to add machines to a domain the same
way Windows lets you do it from the worksta
> > Would someone please do the list a favor and remove the infected user
from
> > the mailing list?
>
> We're working on it.
The better solution is to block attachments to the list. That eliminates
almost all viruses as well as all the other junk that floats around in
attachments.
Dan
--
To u
Hello all:
I am running Samba 2.2.3a on RedHat 7.3. I have a user with an extensive
Local Profile. I want to join his computer to the domain and make his
current local profile a roaming one. I have tried the following steps:
Attached the computer to the domain.
Logged into the computer as a
I found something on the internet.
In older versions each printer was a separate share and in smb.conf this is
in fact still the case.
Each printer has its own section [lp1], etc
If you just put 'valid users = ' in the printer's section, this should still
be working.
Users can still print to a prin
I believe a printer is a share. I don't think this would work for the
special [printers] section. The smb.conf would need a separate share
definition for each printer.
Joel
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:40:16PM +0100, smbmail wrote:
> Yes but this goes for shares, not for printers
>
> - Original
Yes but this goes for shares, not for printers
- Original Message -
From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "smbmail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba print permissions for specific users/groups
wanted
> This
This is valid users, not hosts allow.
Joel
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 11:33:55PM +0100, smbmail wrote:
>
> As far as I know you can only deny specific IP-ranges with hosts deny (or
> allow with hosts allow)
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Thomas E
Why not just ignore it?
Hitting the D key is easy. Takes about 10 secs per day.
You are using just text email, aren't you?
You aren't reading email as root, are you?
If you are really security conscious, you'll create a unique user with
virtually no privileges to read your email.
After that, why wo
As far as I know you can only deny specific IP-ranges with hosts deny (or
allow with hosts allow)
- Original Message -
From: "Joel Hammer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Thomas Eisenzopf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 11:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samb
Adios.
Joel
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 01:41:03PM -0500, Ken Schneider wrote:d0i
> I guess it's time to unsubscribe from this list since they don't know
> how to setup and use anti-virus software on the list server.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
This is straight out of the smb.conf man page from your local mirror of
samba.org.
it might help you.
deadtime (G)
The value of the parameter (a decimal integer) represents the number of
minutes of inactivity before a connection is considered dead, and it is
disconnected. The deadtime only takes
man smb.conf
/ valid users
You may have to set up individual shares for each printer, not sure.
Joel
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:06:11PM +0100, Thomas Eisenzopf wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I installed a samba server (2.2.7) with a NT domain and printing support
> without problems, everything is working fin
I haven't tried this, but you can use smbstatus to get the pid of the smbd
supplying the services to those users, then kill -15 pid.
Since the output includes when the connection was made, you could write a
bash script or whatever and kill connections older than a certain date or
belonging to certa
I seem to recall the existence of a utility to convert (dump?) TDB files
into text format so one could peruse the contents. I also seem to
recall that one could do the reverse - build a TDB from a text file.
Is this true? Does this utility exist? Would I have to hack my own out
of the TDB code
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I thought that it was quite impossible to do that due to the Domain SID
>
>as well as the SAM list that currently Samba is unable to retrieve. (Not
>
>that it would have helped me any, since our old NT 4.0 PDC took a major
>Hardware failure.)
>
> How w
On January 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I thought that it was quite impossible to do that due to the Domain SID
> as well as the SAM list that currently Samba is unable to retrieve. (Not
> that it would have helped me any, since our old NT 4.0 PDC took a major
> Hardware failure.)
>
I thought that it was quite impossible to do that due to the Domain SID
as well as the SAM list that currently Samba is unable to retrieve. (Not
that it would have helped me any, since our old NT 4.0 PDC took a major
Hardware failure.)
How would one duplicate the SID, is t
On January 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Has anyone succeeded in doing a transparent (or an
> as-close-to-as-possible) migration of an NT4 PDC to a Samba PDC?
Yes, search the archives for the procedure I posted on Nov 25 or
thereabouts.
The only "problem" as such is that if you need to keep the P
I have a situation where some 2000 machines are unable to join the samba
domain. We have about 50 machines of which two thirds are 2000 boxes.
All of the 9x boxes log to the samba domain with no trouble. Of the 2000
machines we have two groups - some IBM's and some Dell's with the Dell's
being a co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Kyle Loree wrote:
>
>> I have gotten samba to allow an xp client to logon to the domain server
>> before, my problem now is doing exactly that on a different machine.
>> I can browse files, but I get an access is denied error upon join.
>>
>> [2003/0
Hi all,
I read a few posts a while back from people who were trying to get this
done.
Has anyone succeeded in doing a transparent (or an
as-close-to-as-possible) migration of an NT4 PDC to a Samba PDC?
I know it entails stuff like snatching the passwords with pwdump or the
like, and importing th
My RedHat 8.0 workstation doesn't want to play nice
with Winbind. The rest of our Samba servers (on
RedHat 7.3) are working fine, and I am familiar with
setting up Winbind.
Samba: 2.2.7a (RPM from Samba.org. RedHat's RPMs do
same thing.)
Kernel 2.4.20
NT 4 domain
I'd copied the pam and smb.conf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Is there a place that has all the options that you can add to the smb.conf
>file in verion 3. How to set up as a domain controller and how the acl's
>work. The documentation for verion 2.x on the samba web site is excellent
>, but I was not able to find any for 3.x. An
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Kyle Loree wrote:
> I have gotten samba to allow an xp client to logon to the domain server
> before, my problem now is doing exactly that on a different machine.
> I can browse files, but I get an access is denied error upon join
Title: RE : [Samba] Winbind on HPUX11, Totally Stuck, Please Help
Hi
Drew,
No
luck.
Pretty
much done all that, still get all the same problems.
That
site was pretty good though :o)
Does
anyone have an idea about the shell logging in? Why do I keep on getting
logged out? Does the
Is there a place that has all the options that you can add to the smb.conf
file in verion 3. How to set up as a domain controller and how the acl's
work. The documentation for verion 2.x on the samba web site is excellent
, but I was not able to find any for 3.x. Any help is greatly appreciated.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23 Jan 2003, Jeff Marcille wrote:
>
> Is it possible to remove a printer driver with Samba? I can update one
> and install them through the add/remove wizard but can not remove one.
Goto the drivers tab of the Server properties window (printers f
> i want the server (which is running samba and is
> configured as PDC) to execute a simple shell
> script when a specific (or any?) user logs on
> with his nt machine. is this possible?
>
> to clear the things, i do NOT mean a batch file
> that is executed on the client, it has to be
> executed o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Jim wrote:
> Just to be sure, will setting 'ldap ssl = off' affect anything other
> than the communications between the samba and ldap servers?
No.
cheers, jerry
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, John P Santos wrote:
> Would someone please do the list a favor and remove the infected user from
> the mailing list?
We're working on it.
>
> At 14:11 27/1/2003, you wrote:
> >Symantec Email Proxy deleted the following email m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, akshaysalkar wrote:
> i would like to know
> whats the difference between
> security = server
i.e. Win9x pass through authentication
> security = domain
i.e. Windows NT 4.0 domain member server (uses RPC for authentication).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Except for some reason, in his/her infinite wisdom, your webmaster has
> apparently decided not to put most of your documentation on your website
> - where is it? Why is it not online? I cannot belive I a
Dear Mr/Mrs,
You have send our company an e-mail with the subject:
"samba digest, Vol 1 #2117 - 14 msgs"
wich contains a virus according to our virusscanner.
It is also possible that a virus misuses your e-mail
address, in that case sorry for the accusation. In that case
please see this mail as a
It's not the list, it's the recipient's who have autoresponders set up.
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
> I guess it's time to unsubscribe from t
I have a win2k domain ... 2 of the client machines are Red Hat (7.3 and
8.0). I set everything up to use the DC to authenticate ID/PW. Everything
worked perfectly until a week or so ago ... Samba would automatically create
a home folder and the whole nine yards. Now I can see the shares on the
S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Barry, Christopher wrote:
> All,
> Could this patch in any way cause problems with samba?
Anything is possible. However, we don't do smb signing in 2.2 so
theorietically, this would not affect Samba (unless it did somethi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Dezider Gora wrote:
> Connecting to host=PRINTSERVER share=IPC$
> Connecting to 10.223.11.1 at port 445
> error connecting to 10.223.11.1:445 (Connection refused)
Samba 2.2 does not service port 445 by default (Samba 3.0 will).
J
Rashkae wrote:
I have to wonder which, at this point causes more congestion and stress to
e-mail systems. E-mail viruses, or aggresive Anti-Virus programs that
are configured to allert everyone. Is this a configurable option in AV
software... Should people start pressuring AV companies to change
Thanks Jerry. My fear was the latter...
--
Christopher Barry
Manager of Information Systems
InfiniCon Systems
http://www.infiniconsys.com
office: 610.233.4747
direct: 610.233.4870
cell: 267.879.8321
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday,
I have gotten samba to allow an xp client to logon to the domain server
before, my problem now is doing exactly that on a different machine.
I can browse files, but I get an access is denied error upon join.
[2003/01/27 10:46:21, 0]
/SourceCache/samba/samba-21/source/rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 00:36, Ryan Beisner wrote:
Hi all
I've found a few different packages (RAV, Kaspersky,Vexira, Clam ...)
which offer Anti-Virus features for Linux servers. It looks like RAV
specifically supports Samba servers.
My question is:
Can anyone relay their
well.. let´s see this step by step...
have you aplied the registry changes (signorseal) ?
created Machine accounts on the server ?
(I will not give up until your XP join the domain!)
At 16:44 27/01/03, Jerome Warnier wrote:
joao marka wrote:
well, just to let ya know my case, the first macine
Mark Butcher wrote:
"What I can not yet do is transfer data from the Linux box to a Windows PC
from the Linux machine - I don't know how to view the network "
Previous posts suggest you are using SuSE. If so, one way to look at the network in a friendly environment is to go to Yast2's "Instal
I have to wonder which, at this point causes more congestion and stress to
e-mail systems. E-mail viruses, or aggresive Anti-Virus programs that
are configured to allert everyone. Is this a configurable option in AV
software... Should people start pressuring AV companies to change this
behaviour?
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 14:30, Daniel Fenwick wrote:
> > If someone that maintains the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER could find out who is
> > sending the messages with the virus they could unsubscribe that one
> > person and notify them. That way the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER would NOT be
> > passing on more virii.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, David Bear wrote:
> I have installed samba 2.2.7a on FreeBSD from the ports collection. I
> have used an existing samba config file which worked with samba 2.0.x.
>
> I am using security = server
Use security = domain and your
On Tue, 2003-01-28 at 00:36, Ryan Beisner wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've found a few different packages (RAV, Kaspersky,Vexira, Clam ...)
> which offer Anti-Virus features for Linux servers. It looks like RAV
> specifically supports Samba servers.
>
>
> My question is:
>
> Can anyone relay their exp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As I understood from Samba documentation winbind can run without PAM
> installed; PAM is needed only if I need interactive login in the Unix
> box of NT domain users. Am I correct?
Yes. Pam is optiona
Ken Schneider wrote:
I guess it's time to unsubscribe from this list since they don't know
how to setup and use anti-virus software on the list server.
At least today some antivir software would be really great, or at least
some mechanism to block all the antivir-software-answers to the list...
(Embedded image moved to file: pic30161.pcx)
NVC for Domino Virus Warning
This is an automatically generated message.
A possible virus, 'Yaha.E@mm', was detected in attachment
'Neu_Textdokument__2_.jpg_.bat' in document '[Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument
(2)'.
Database: 'KAWILK01 Mailbox'.
Docume
The virus message came from the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER to me as well as many
others. I don't need to read many messages about how someone's email
server caught a virus that was passed through the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER by
someone posting to the list.
It's not the listserv's problem that we got spammed; it
Hello
I'm trying to setup a samba server on my router box, the problem I have is
that I need to have different configurations on the internal and
external interfaces.
Internally the server should act as a domain logon master for my windows
machines and to the outside world it should participate i
Would someone please do the list a favor and remove the infected user from
the mailing list?
At 14:11 27/1/2003, you wrote:
>Symantec Email Proxy deleted the following email message:
>
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: samba digest, Vol 1 #2117 - 14 msgs
>
--
To unsubscri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Daniel Fenwick wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what the following error in my log. files
> means? It is new since upgrading to 227a.
>
> rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_query_aliasmem(2626) _samr_query_aliasmem:
> Not yet implement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Chris Nolan wrote:
> Additionally, does anyone have any experience in setting up an entirely
> Samba-driven solution for fail-over? This place has two servers, and I
> was hoping to be able to setup Samba on both so that if the ma
Antigen for Exchange found Neu Textdokument (2).jpg
.bat matching FILE FILTER
Panda Antivirus has found the following viruses in the message:
Server :IM_T-EXCH
Sent by :
Address : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To :[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject : [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
Date : 27/01/2003 20:33
Der er
Receiver, InterScan has detected virus(es) in the e-mail attachment.
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 19:34:41 -
Method: Mail
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
File: Neu Textdokument (2).jpg
The virus message came from the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER to me as well as many
others. I don't need to read many messages about how someone's email
server caught a virus that was passed through the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER by
someone posting to the list.
If someone that maintains the SAMBA EMAIL SERVER could
Hi everybody:
The Windows Team is planing to upgrade the NT 4.0 Domain, we have now,
to a Windows 2000 Domain, Does anybody know if it's represent a problem
to my Samba Box???
If yes; what will I have to do??
Thanks
--
Aldo Damian Ambriz Martinez
Depto Sis
Hi Samba Mailing list
Many thanks for the help as I had problems with my first Linux session and
couldn't get the Linux box on to the Windows network.
I seem to have managed to get things working by adding "netbios name =
webserver" to the config file. Then creating and adding a password to a
use
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has detected virus-infected attachment(s).
Sender = archiv24
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
Scanning Time = 01/27/2003 19:33:43
Engine/Pattern = 5.600-1011/447
Action on virus found:
The attachment Neu Textdokument (2).j
Hi All,
After a couple of months break (and running only a single instance of SAMBA)
I once again need to try and get two simultaneous instances of SAMBA running
on the same machine, each serving up a different domain/workgroup.
Here's the scoop:
one machine, with dual NICs, the first one is on
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 7:28 PM
Subject: [Samba] ScanMail Message: To Recipient file blocking settings
matched and action taken.
> ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has blocked an attachment.
the samba server use
joao marka wrote:
well, just to let ya know my case, the first macine w/ xp pro i´ve
installed here, i´ve tried everything (including the signorseal patch)
and it didn´t worked out... just after the service pack...
the second machine, i´ve just installed the service pack 1 and... voila!
it join
I guess it's time to unsubscribe from this list since they don't know
how to setup and use anti-virus software on the list server.
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 14:29, archiv24 wrote:
*** WARNING **
This message has been scanned by MDaemon AntiViru
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
Scanning Time = 01/27/2003 13:32:20
Engine/Pattern = 6.510-1002
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
Scanning Time = 01/27/2003 12:31:59
Engine/Pattern = 6.510-1002
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has taken action on the message, please
refer to the contents of this message for further details.
Sender = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Subject = [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
Scanning Time = 01/27/2003 18:29:40
Engine/Pattern = 6.510-1002
ScanMail for Microsoft Exchange has blocked an attachment.
Sender = archiv24
Recipient(s) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject = [Samba] Fw: Neu Textdokument (2)
Scanning Time = 01/27/2003 13:28:41
Action on file blocking:
The attachment Neu Textdokument (2).jpg
The file attachment "Neu Textdokument (2).jpg
.bat" which was sent by ""archi
Zeit 23:48:06 26.01.2003
Typ Bericht
Betreff Eine Flotte nach 1:113:9 erreichte ihr Ziel
Nachricht Angreifer (1:110:1)
Flugzeuge Gesamt Verluste
Raven 20 12
Verteidiger (1:113:9)
Flugzeuge Gesamt Verluste
Keine Flugzeuge vorhanden
Defensivanlagen Gesamt V..More details attached
<>
Alejandro Glez de Chaves Guerrero wrote:
What I try in this project is to extensive the PHP language with a library that
it conects to a SAMBA file server and makes the functions that alows us the
SMBCLIENT on the actually systems.
The samba website has a "development" section; scroll down
near
well, just to let ya know my case, the first macine w/ xp pro i´ve
installed here, i´ve tried everything (including the signorseal patch) and
it didn´t worked out... just after the service pack...
the second machine, i´ve just installed the service pack 1 and... voila! it
joined the domain witho
i want the server (which is running samba and is configured as PDC) to execute
a simple shell script when a specific (or any?) user logs on with his nt
machine. is this possible?
to clear the things, i do NOT mean a batch file that is executed on the
client, it has to be executed on the server!
On Mon, 2003-01-27 at 12:33, Jason Kirschenmann wrote:
> hi,
> the last piece of advice i got just reminded me of how new i am at this.
> You said to check the logs and make sure the user has permissions for those
> folders. The log says alot of stuff, and i have no idea what any of it
> means
Hello,
All my problems are solved, but I can't understand what was the reason
of those problems (I had problems with DNS and Apache too).
I have reinstalled the software, and everything works. Possibly, the
hardware errors of the CDROM drive during installation, I have cleaned
the lens, and n
Hi!
If done the same job, but i've replaced a novell server with a samba pdc
based on SuSE Linux. I had different problems with Win XP Pro, but none
with the other WinOS.
Have you installed the "SignOrSeal"-Patch? Without this, you can't logon
with a win xp machine on a samba domain.
Use Google
Thanks to those who had suggestions on my last
post, but none of those seems to have worked. I have narrowed down the
problem a bit though, seems users can't write to a share that is not their
primary group. For example: Bob's primary group is Bob and secondary
group is Sally. Bob can wr
hi,
the last piece of advice i got just reminded me of how new i am at this.
You said to check the logs and make sure the user has permissions for those
folders. The log says alot of stuff, and i have no idea what any of it
means, if you want to see one, just ask and i can send you alot. The o
Hi, I´m an university student of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria ( Canary
Islands, Spain). I apply to you because I´m begining to develop my last
project, I´m at the end of my Computer Engeneer career. What I try in
this project is to extensive the PHP language with a library that it
conects to a SA
Title: Configuring Samba on Dynix
I'm trying to run ./configure on DYNIX/ptx 4.0 V4.4.5 i386
When I do I get a message about not being able to find test files. I've tried setting _SEQUENT_CC_ to -Wc,+abi-socket which has solved network type problems in the past but it still fails.
Can anyon
thanks a lot!
At 13:01 27/01/03, you wrote:
You will need to turn off the webclient under services, unless you need to
access shares through http.
Patrick
joao marka wrote:
I´m having samo strange behaviour from my XP machines.
Sometimes (most always) my XP machines logged onte the sambe (as
well, first thing to know... is your Xp home or professional ?
if is home, bad news, great troubles...
if professional, try The Windows XP service pack 1, here at my network it
has worked very well...
but if is home... all logon scripts and profiles will be stored locally at
the client side, no w
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
