On Sunday 13 February 2005 07:41, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> Craig White to JHT:
>
> [...]
>
> > You are a kind, warm and generous person and the thought that I might
> > have said anything that wounds you bothers me. Any criticism that I may
> > have offered was only offered to make the documentation
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dmitry Melekhov wrote:
| I don't remember why I use disable spoolss ;-) I
| use it for many years. Certanly, I can (and shall) try
| use client driver,
Using the full point-n-print functionality is the best
solution IMO.
| b
Hi all,
I have installed samba-3.0.9 on AIX5.2.
I am trying to join the windows domain after starting the smbd, nmbd,
winbindd services.
When I run "/usr/local/samba/bin/net rpc join U
administrator%password", I get the following error.
Unable to find a suitable server
Unable to
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 21:13 -0500, Michael Lueck wrote:
> I am logged into a new test Linux server with my personal admin account. It
> is a member of a Linux group which has been mapped to Domain Admins.
>
> When I issue 'net rpc rights grant auserid SeMachineAccountPrivilege' and
> enter the p
Bob,
I tried copying the failing directory on my Windows machine to make a "backup"
copy of the failing directory. When I tested it as I had before, it ceased to
fail. I copied the original to see what would happen, and the "Delayed Write
Failed" disappeared there as well. Now I haven't had the
I am logged into a new test Linux server with my personal admin account. It is
a member of a Linux group which has been mapped to Domain Admins.
When I issue 'net rpc rights grant auserid SeMachineAccountPrivilege' and enter the password for my personal admin account, I am returned that it failed
> Hi,
>
> I had the same problem and solved it by adding
>
> use client driver = yes
>
> to the [printers] section.
> I'm not quite sure whether this option is available in
> Samba 2.2.1a
>
Loading the printer drivers onto the server will also
eliminate these error messages ... at leaset in v
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 22:06 +0100, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> Craig White:
>
> My Win XP prof machine accepts any RID whatsoever for Administrator.
> Maybe a Win 2000 machine wouldn't. Moreover, using USRMGR/SRVMGR it
> issues out-of-context RIDS (e.g. 513 for a computer). It coexists with
> and acce
Dixi:
>Hi!
>
>Does this sound familiar, before I try to look deeper into it?
>
>[2005/02/13 20:10:16, 0]
>/usr/ports/net/samba/w-samba-3.0.11/samba-3.0.11/source/libsmb/smbencrypt.c:decode_pw_buffer(539)
>
>
Craig White:
[...]
>> > Please bear in mind that Samba interfaces between MS Windows and
>> > UNIX-like
>> > platforms. The issues we are touching on here are deeper than the
>> > cosmetics of user names and group names. To change the behaviour will
>> > require changes deep inside the smbd sour
Hi!
Does this sound familiar, before I try to look deeper into it?
[2005/02/13 20:10:16, 0]
/usr/ports/net/samba/w-samba-3.0.11/samba-3.0.11/source/libsmb/smbencrypt.c:decode_pw_buffer(539)
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 09:32 -0800, Larry Gagnon wrote:
> I have a problem with a WinXP Home machine using Samba on a small home
> network. Here are the details:
>
> -Samba 3.0.10
> -3 machines: VectorLinux v5 (smbserver), VectorLinux v5/Win98SE dual
> boot (wolf), WinXP Home (andrea), through a ro
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 14:13 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > The problem that apparently both Tonni and I had was coming to terms
> > with the net group map command. It mucked with the DSA attributes of
> > 'displayName' 'sambaSID' 'objectclass' -
>
> I'm confused by this statement. The att
> The problem that apparently both Tonni and I had was coming to terms
> with the net group map command. It mucked with the DSA attributes of
> 'displayName' 'sambaSID' 'objectclass' -
I'm confused by this statement. The attributes displayName and sambaSID
are not relevant to a POSIX group, so t
I am trying to run the following command and keep getting the same
error. My question is is there a problem with my command or is this
possibly an issue with Samba
smbcacls -d test_file -A ACL:DOMAIN\username:ALLOWED/0/CHANGE -U username
Here is the error:
debug_parse_params: unrecognized debug
Here is the configuration:
[global]
server string = Linux DC (%h)
netbios name = xxx
display charset = iso-8859-1
name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast
admin users = @winadm
obey pam restrictions = yes
lm announce = no
time ser
I have a problem with a WinXP Home machine using Samba on a small home
network. Here are the details:
-Samba 3.0.10
-3 machines: VectorLinux v5 (smbserver), VectorLinux v5/Win98SE dual
boot (wolf), WinXP Home (andrea), through a router.
-workgroup is "HOME"
-smb.conf is:
[global]
encrypt p
On Sun, 2005-02-13 at 16:16 +0100, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> John H Terpstra:
>
> [...]
>
> > FYI. I run Samba training classes around the world. I use SuSE Linux
> > Enterprise Server 9 and SuSE Linux 9.2 Professional to host Samba. All
> > classes are run using OpenLDAP 2.2 and the Idealx scripts.
Hello,
When a user is defined in admin users, Samba will always do file
operations for this user as root. In my case when these users creates
a new file or directory root i defined as owner of the new files as
well. When only accessing the files through windows, this isn't
usually a problem, but o
Hi Carl,
I am having the same problem now. I am using Fedora FC-3. Have you ever
figured out the solution for this problem?
Thank you very much,
Stuart Xu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/
Craig White to JHT:
[...]
> You are a kind, warm and generous person and the thought that I might
> have said anything that wounds you bothers me. Any criticism that I may
> have offered was only offered to make the documentation better.
Seconded. That's obvious from the official HOWTO, which is
John H Terpstra:
[...]
> FYI. I run Samba training classes around the world. I use SuSE Linux
> Enterprise Server 9 and SuSE Linux 9.2 Professional to host Samba. All
> classes are run using OpenLDAP 2.2 and the Idealx scripts.
>
> I have deployed Samba-3 and OpenLDAP 2.2.x in several large sites
John H Terpstra:
> The Samba-HOWTO-Collection and Samba-Guide documentation has worked for
> many people, but I am quick to admit that it can be significantly
> improved. There is little benefit in my continuously pounding this list
> with requests for patches and updates - even though we have dem
Hi all,
Apologies if this has posted twice, I've only just found out how to post
to a moderated group and my first attempts didn't work.
I'm new to this newsgroup and quite new to Linux in general. My Samba
ver 3.0.7 (under Mandrake 10.1) used to work happily linking to my
Windows ME machine. Aft
I'm betting you using the lin98sk-driver (which is typical for built in
networkadapters on athlon64 mb:s). I think I pulled all my hair off
trying to solve the same problem a few month ago. It's just so typical
when you change all your hardware, upgrade the software and then run
into problems.
Den 11-02-2005 kl 12:09 skrev David Rankin:
>From: "Josh Kelley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> david rankin wrote:
>>
>>>Well, no, I'm not positive, but when whatever hangs, I get a big
>>> slowdown in file access, file open, etc.. from XP. When I then go and
>>> check the logs the transport end p
fred wu wrote:
Dear All,
I have surfed a lot on Samba and Network Area Storage(NAS) Solution
but I still got the answers. Could anyone kindly help me?
Question 1: How many TB / GB does Samba support?
I believe you'll find these limits have more to do with the underlying fs.
Question 2: Does S
Dear All,
I have surfed a lot on Samba and Network Area Storage(NAS) Solution
but I still got the answers. Could anyone kindly help me?
Question 1: How many TB / GB does Samba support?
Question 2: Does Samba work well with RAID and NAS?
All your help is very appreciated. Thank You!
On Sat, 2005-02-12 at 15:38 -0700, John H Terpstra wrote:
> > Interestingly enough, I used Gerry Carter's LDAP book which deals with
> > LDAP first and then how to integrate samba (of course, this was 2.2 when
> > book was published) which is clearly the approach that you and I have
> > taken.
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
