Hi all!
I use samba 3.0.7 with "bind interfaces only" option. For "interfaces"
option I use eth1.3:* expression which works fine at startup: samba
binds to eth1.3:1
Later, when I configure eth1.3:2 up, sending SIGHUP to smbd it does not
bind to eth1.3:2 (nmbd does). smbd.log says:
[2005/05/23 0
> I cannot believe that.
Unknown command - "I". Try HELP.
> +++ Attachment: No Virus found
Unknown command - "+++". Try HELP.
> +++ MessageLabs AntiVirus - www.messagelabs.com
Unknown command - "+++". Try HELP.
Summary of resource utilization
---
CPU time:0.0
the first mail was blocked because too big :-) I keep the log.nmbd for
you if you want
again here is in attachement my smb.conf file and the /var/log/samba
files during the call at NetShareEnum (log level = 10)
On the Windows 2000, I call NetShareEnum with a process with the
"BUDDY\hky" iden
>OK, I've been searching the archives and google with little luck...
>
>I have a directory which needs to be shared with a number of UNIX
>clients via NFS and with Windows clients via Samba. What is the best
>way to do this? Should I configure Samba to share the actual NFS mount?
> Or should I co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> The only error message I can find in the log files is
>
> "getpeername failed. Error was Transport endpoint is not
> connected"
>
> and
>
> "could not connect to any ldap server" (after the crash).
>
> Please help me - I have looked through
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I have /home nfs mounted from a NFS server to /home on a SMB server.
...
> Any help would be most appreciated,
> -Ben
I think you would be better off by far to run both Samba and NFS on the
same box, if you can.
Jim C.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I have a question, of course...
> We are currently running a network using samba3 with security = user ,
...
> there are about 20 users in the domain.
1. You could migrate your postfix users to LDAP... but you knew that
probably.
2. You could set up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> OK, I've been searching the archives and google with little luck...
>
> I have a directory which needs to be shared with a number of UNIX
> clients via NFS and with Windows clients via Samba. What is the best
> way to do this? Should I configure S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>>net groupmap modify ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=root
...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0 root]$ getent group adm
> adm:x:4:ldap
OK, we got this worked out. A million thanks to John T. :-)
Jim C.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (Mi
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: AragonX [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Mai 2005 15:42
> An: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: [Samba] Performance problem when writing large files!
>
>
>
> > First thanks for your fast replay, I'll going to check with
> FT
Hi All,
When trying to map my SAMBA share from WinXP, it prompted me for name
and password but it failed when I used [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, using "domain\name" worked.
Any idea why my SAMBA server didn't accept this name style [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
Assume: Realm (AD domain): domain.com
I have /home nfs mounted from a NFS server to /home on a SMB server. Can I
make %H shares available from the SMB server? Or, more specifically, I
used to be able to with earlier versions of Linux and Samba, but have
problems now after upgrading to RHEL 3 and Samba 3.0. From the windows
clien
OK, I've been searching the archives and google with little luck...
I have a directory which needs to be shared with a number of UNIX
clients via NFS and with Windows clients via Samba. What is the best
way to do this? Should I configure Samba to share the actual NFS mount?
Or should I configur
Everything is working now.
Thank you for all the help!
Don't really know what fixed it, but now it works.
I'm starting to think most problems are fixed by restarting samba and
winbind.
I changed one thing in smb.conf:
From the previous posts:
template homedir = /home/%D/%U
To this:
I have a question, of course...
We are currently running a network using samba3 with security = user ,
mainly because i started with a 2x version and just updated last
month. Everything went great but I am wondering if this is still the
best setting... There are no windows servers left ( i killed
Hi Adrian, I hope you don't mind me bothering you, but I am having the
same Excel locking problem, did you happen to find a solution?
Anne Moman, IS Project Mgmt Office
TransCanada Pipelines
450 1st Street S.W
Calgary, AB, T2P 5H1
Tel: (403) 920-5204
This electronic message and any attach
I had SAMABA 3.0.10 perfectly setup on Fedora core 3 as a Domain member
of windows 2003 Domain until I installed Win 2003 SP1.
I am using winbind for unified logons between windows 2003 Domain
Controller and Linux and everything was working perfectly. I could
access SAMBA shares from any windows do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> net groupmap modify ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=root
> This should enable the users in the "root" group to be considered as
> domain admins by workstations, thus enabling the user "root" to be an
> administrator of all windows workst
I have /home nfs mounted from a NFS server to /home on a SMB server. Can I
make %H shares available from the SMB server? Or, more specifically, I
used to be able to with earlier versions of Linux and Samba, but have
problems now after upgrading to RHEL 3 and Samba 3.0. From the windows
clien
Thanks, the weird part is I joined the domain with no problem.
Gary
On 5/24/05 3:08 PM, "John H Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 May 2005 13:10, Gary Hostetler wrote:
>> I have compiled and install samba 3 from source. The services start and I
>> can smbclient localhost etc. j
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 13:10, Gary Hostetler wrote:
> I have compiled and install samba 3 from source. The services start and I
> can smbclient localhost etc. just fine and I can get a list of the
> computers in my active directory with that command. When I do a wbinfo -u I
> get "error looking up
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 02:10 pm, Gary Hostetler wrote:
> I have compiled and install samba 3 from source. The services start and I
> can smbclient localhost etc. just fine and I can get a list of the
> computers in my active directory with that command. When I do a wbinfo -u I
> get "error looking
On Tuesday May 24 2005 2:51 pm, Michael Andrewjeski wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I'm attempting to join a win2k3 domain as a member server with great
> difficulty. I've read The HowTo, but am hung when attempting to join the
> Domain. I can kinit & klist Which seems good, but the ads join fails.
>
> Can s
I have compiled and install samba 3 from source. The services start and I
can smbclient localhost etc. just fine and I can get a list of the computers
in my active directory with that command. When I do a wbinfo -u I get "error
looking up domain users." My smb.conf file has security = ads, my realm
Hi List,
I'm attempting to join a win2k3 domain as a member server with great difficulty.
I've read The HowTo, but am hung when attempting to join the Domain. I can
kinit & klist
Which seems good, but the ads join fails.
Can someone help me understand what is causing the error listed below?
On 5/24/05 9:56 AM, Per Reedtz Thomsen wrote:
Hi,
I'm a newbie to the list, so bear with my ignorance.
I have installed 3.0.14a on FC3, and am using it on a network of 5 XP boxes.
The symptoms are as follows:
When I initially start using the server, there is a significant delay (~
20 seconds)
Hi,
I'm a newbie to the list, so bear with my ignorance.
I have installed 3.0.14a on FC3, and am using it on a network of 5 XP boxes.
The symptoms are as follows:
When I initially start using the server, there is a significant delay (~
20 seconds) to accessing the share (home directory or a regu
On Saturday 05 February 2005 13:25, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> Looks like it might be a hardware problem on your network then.
Friday May 24, my windows machine corrupted itself to the point of failure (as
it does about twice a year), and I was forced to reload from scratch (a two
day job).
After
Here is a dump of all the raw packets from the interface Samba is bound to. I
attempted to login twice, both failed and gave a RPC error. I used TCPDUMP -i
eth1 -s 0 -w tcpdump.tcp. Its a file but there isn't any other way of doing it.
Packet dump -> http://home.mindspring.com/~ops21/tcpdump.tcp
Hello,
after upgrading from 3.0.8 to 3.0.14a I started have problems in my network.
Environment:
- clients with W2KSP4
- Linux Debian Sarge server with Samba acting as PDC.
There was no other changes on server configuration.
Problems:
1) Only some users cannot reach their home share automatically
> First thanks for your fast replay, I'll going to check with FTP tomorrow
> in the early morning because there are less peoples online.
>
> You'll hear from me tomorrow.
Are you using a newer distro? The format of top has changed. Are you
noticing high HI and/or LO values? On older versions o
> Good idea! Bonnie++ is good, I also like tiobench as it benchmarks the
> block
> device's IO capabilities...
>
> I used a stopwatch as well, I suppose a small program that will copy a
> large
> file and give back a rate would be useful in benchmarking.
>
> I suppose that as far as standardizing,
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Monday 23 May 2005 13:41, Rex Dieter wrote:
I know that
$ net user info
returns the groups that a user is a (direct) member of, but for my
immediate purposes, that is not sufficient (we're using nested groups).
AFAICT, nothing in the current Samba-HOWTO mentions an
> I'd be very interested in such a site, as long as people acutally put data
> there. I've wanted to see other's benchmarks/setups for years. Getting
> people to actually talk is hard.
Why don't you post your results? I've put some of mine on there. I have
three more machines on 2 different net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geoff Scott wrote:
| Samba 4 as you can see in the docs that are available,
| is very limited in features. There is no security yet,
| no management tools yet and no printing support yet.
| Contemplating whether it can do what you want when
| the ea
That's it. "Problem" solved.
Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: "Fabio Muzzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba Domain Administrator
Hello Jorge,
Monday, May 23, 2005, 6:51:59 PM, you wrote:
JF> Someone told me to insert "d
Hi,
We are running Samba 3.0.14a on Sparc Solaris 8.
On our Samba share getent passwd resolves the user id but getent group
hangs.
The group is shown as 1 under Samba 3.0.14a but when the share is
switched over to the other cluster node running Samba 2.2.8a the same
directory shows a gid
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Fabio Muzzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Mai 2005 11:33
> Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
> Betreff: Re: [Samba] Performance problem when writing large files!
>
>
> Hello Josef,
>
> Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 8:39:27 AM, you wrote:
>
> JFl
Hello Josef,
Tuesday, May 24, 2005, 8:39:27 AM, you wrote:
JFlc> We encounter following problem. If somebody on the network writes
JFlc> big files from windows clients to a samba shared directory, the
JFlc> performance of the server will be as much degraded, that, using top,
JFlc> on all
Hello Jorge,
Monday, May 23, 2005, 6:51:59 PM, you wrote:
JF> Someone told me to insert "domain admin group = group I want" or
JF> "domain admin user = users I want" in my smb.conf file, but it didn't
JF> worked (looks like that was for older versions of samba).
JF> Can someone help?
Try this co
Hi,
when I am runnig on samba PDC command: net rpc group add "demo"
-Uroot%password , samba returns this message: NT_STATUS _ACCESS_DENIED.
What is it? Where shall I set access rights?
Thanks
Zdenek
http://www.seznam.cz - e-mai
Hi Samba Users,
I'm using a typical Samba/LDAP Solution. My PDC is running samba 3.0.14a
on RHEL4. This is also my acting WINS server.
WINS resolution appears to be working fine for all other PC's on the
network. It works for my BDC, and Domain member servers and the various
windows clients on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John H Terpstra wrote:
> http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf
John, I found a typo in 12.3.3, pg 209. First line of 12.3.3 "great"
should be "create".
Jim C.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32
43 matches
Mail list logo
