On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 14:29 +0100, Pawel Sawicki wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 04:24:38AM -0800, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>
> > Have you tried mod_ntlm_winbind on apache 1.3 (the apache2 port team
> > seems to have died off).
>
> No. I must use Apache2 due to integration with the Subversion - mo
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Firstly the documentation you have been using is 3rd party documentation and
not the offical Samba docs. I suggest you look at the Samba web site and
read "Samba 3 by Example" chapter 5 is what your looking for. It makes it
difficult for people to help when you use 3rd
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 22:29 -0600, Eric Hines wrote:
> At 12/10/05 22:10, Craig White wrote:
> >On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 20:04 -0600, Eric Hines wrote:
> > > I'm currently running SUSE Pro 9.3 with samba-3.0.13-1.1-SUSE, and I'm
> > > trying to upgrade to 3.0.20b. When I try to rpm -Uvh samba-3.0.20b
At 12/10/05 22:10, Craig White wrote:
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 20:04 -0600, Eric Hines wrote:
> I'm currently running SUSE Pro 9.3 with samba-3.0.13-1.1-SUSE, and I'm
> trying to upgrade to 3.0.20b. When I try to rpm -Uvh samba-3.0.20b
> and samba-client-3.0.20b, I get the failed dependency "samba
On Sat, 2005-12-10 at 20:04 -0600, Eric Hines wrote:
> I'm currently running SUSE Pro 9.3 with samba-3.0.13-1.1-SUSE, and I'm
> trying to upgrade to 3.0.20b. When I try to rpm -Uvh samba-3.0.20b
> and samba-client-3.0.20b, I get the failed dependency "samba = 3.0.13 is
> needed by (installed)
Hi!
Have you added the user to smbpasswd list?
Run a smbpasswd -add on the user and you shouldn't have any problems.
Cheers,
Henrik
10 dec 2005 kl. 19:21 skrev Bud Curtis:
I have a simple LAN microsoft workgroup setup with four W2K systems
and one
linux server. I'm planning on the Fedora 4 b
I have a simple LAN microsoft workgroup setup with four W2K systems and one
linux server. I'm planning on the Fedora 4 box to be the printer and file
server. I have samba running and I can see the file shares in the windows
file explorer. However, I can't connect because of a password issue. I
I'm currently running SUSE Pro 9.3 with samba-3.0.13-1.1-SUSE, and I'm
trying to upgrade to 3.0.20b. When I try to rpm -Uvh samba-3.0.20b
and samba-client-3.0.20b, I get the failed dependency "samba = 3.0.13 is
needed by (installed) samba-vscan-0.3.5-37.2."
How do I resolve this dependency?
I can mount Win 2003 shares on my Macs fine. However, the shares
disappear after a while. This behavior is unlike on XP where the
mounts stay attached forever. The session timeout on 2003 doesn't
matter. It works that way out of the box, and after reconfiguring
samba on the MAC to join the
Hi. I'd like some help trying to troubleshoot a permissions issue on my
system if you folks don't mind. I'm sure it's just a small thing - but
another pair of eyes may help me locate the issue.
My platform is Solaris 10 running on a Sun Fire V440. I'm running Samba
3.0.21RC2 compiled with Sun Stud
Michael,
Worked like a champ. Thanks for your help.
Eric
At 12/10/05 11:23, Michael Barnes wrote:
Eric,
Try changing your smb.conf file to:
[accounts]
valid users = @accounts
force group = accounts
(along with the other usual stuff)
[finsvcs]
valid users = @f
look for samba mailing list for command-line-printer-installation
(it was here, but I missed the link, actually it will work on w2k and
above)
also, we use the following in our logon scripts (not sure it will work
for nt4 and 9x, never tried it):
if "%COMPUTERNAME%" == "TERMINAL" go
Hi list,
Just in order to avoid loosing my time, I would be happy to know any
success stories about configuring a Win2k3 as a Samba 3 client, just as
any others MS client ( WinNT pro, Win2k pro, WinXP pro ).
If so, is there any tuning on the Win2k3 client and the server ( Samba 3
PDC + ldapsam,
Eric,
Try changing your smb.conf file to:
[accounts]
valid users = @accounts
force group = accounts
(along with the other usual stuff)
[finsvcs]
valid users = @finsvcs
force group = finsvcs
(along with the other usual stuff)
This will limit access
Hi guys,
I'm planning a fileserver for around 12 small companies (two to five
people each) who share one buidling/office and all IT resources.
Since I'm not responsible or involved in the client support, I want to
prevent the different companies from seeing each other's PCs through
network browsi
SOLVED! Follow-up:
Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 06:27 -0500, Brian Hoover wrote:
>> Andrew Bartlett wrote:
>>
I could not find the patch you speek of, but I am using the same
daemon I used in a PPTP config that works.
>>>
>>> Oh, and that uses winbind auth?
>>
>> I'm
16 matches
Mail list logo