Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 19:10 -0700, Doug VanLeuven wrote:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, then point samba at itself
(I've been using windows servers for WINS)
wins server = 127.0.0.1
you're wrong - wins support = yes is sufficient
Thanks for the correction.
P
sounds like SELinux issue (FC-5) - check /var/log/messages, dmesg for
'denied avc' messages to confirm. If so...
either, turn SELinux to 'permissive' mode
or
learn how to use SELinux to 'label' /shared for use with Samba
http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/
Craig
Thank you so mu
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 21:14 -0700, DuongThanh An wrote:
> Hi!,
>
> I have a simple configuration for samba to have my /shared dir got shared as
> writable to everyone in my LAN. The configuration, however, seems not to work
> :(.
>
> Could someone help me out this situation?
>
> My configurati
Im using debian sarge samba 3.0.14a with no problems.
I just upgraded to samba 3.0.22 to test it and i found the following
problem in the two seconds of testing it
==> alem-tsii.log <==
[2006/07/08 01:17:49, 0] lib/debug.c:reopen_logs(597)
Unable to open new log file /var/log/samba/alem-tsii
Hi!,
I have a simple configuration for samba to have my /shared dir got shared as
writable to everyone in my LAN. The configuration, however, seems not to work
:(.
Could someone help me out this situation?
My configuration:
[global]
workgroup = mygroup
server string = thanhan
print
Eric Evans escreveu:
probably would be much easier if you understood Windows Networking
principles.
I'm sure it would, I'm trying my best to learn them. In the meantime
I have a bunch of users who are impatient to get this thing working
ASAP and who are not patient enough to wait around wh
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 12:34 +0200, Cillier Burger wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
> I'm new so hi to everyone.
>
> Anyway, i'm having a little problem getting Samba and OpenLdap to play
> together nicely.
>
> Its not a Samba problem, in the sense that everything works fine using
> smbpasswd
> etc and i
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 19:10 -0700, Doug VanLeuven wrote:
> Someone correct me if I'm wrong, then point samba at itself
> (I've been using windows servers for WINS)
> wins server = 127.0.0.1
you're wrong - wins support = yes is sufficient
> PS - You could have migrated your server with ju
Eric Evans escreveu:
This is very strange and frustrating. Our users complained that they
weren't able to get ANY Samba access, not even being able to map a
network drive
What that means? Not beeing able to find the server and browse the
network? Beeing able to find it and receiving access d
Cillier Burger wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
> I'm new so hi to everyone.
>
> Anyway, i'm having a little problem getting Samba and OpenLdap to play
> together nicely.
>
> Its not a Samba problem, in the sense that everything works fine using
> smbpasswd
> etc and its not an OpenLDAP problem in the se
EHines wrote:
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Friday 07 July 2006 19:27, Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 16:54 -0700, Huck wrote:
This link may be of some assistance to those updating from Samba 2.
http://www.phptr.com/articles/article.asp?p=419048&rl=1
Since the officia
Eric Evans wrote:
Hello Craig et al,
I didn't think it was possible that you would refute everything that I
said without checking a single bit of information but you definitely did
that.
Jeez, what did I say that was objectionable? I believe that everything
I said was factual, and I certain
Hi Samba users -
I recently upgraded my domain at home from being controlled by two
somewhat messed up Windows DCs (one 2000 and the other 2003, messed up
by
my own inexpert management..) to a nice clean new single 2003 DC (SBS,
if
it matters).
I rejoined all workstations, including a
John H Terpstra wrote:
On Friday 07 July 2006 19:27, Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 16:54 -0700, Huck wrote:
This link may be of some assistance to those updating from Samba 2.
http://www.phptr.com/articles/article.asp?p=419048&rl=1
Since the official Samba docum
Often times 3rd party articles speak in something other than 'Know it
all God-speak' and break it down on more simple terms.
--Huck
Craig White wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 16:54 -0700, Huck wrote:
This link may be of some assistance to those updating from Samba 2.
http://www.phptr.com/artic
I'm new to Samba, too, but here's my two cents worth on your questions:
Eric Evans wrote:
Please let me summarize the points that I'm confused about:
1. Why do I need to use wins support in my smb.conf? I don't see the
point of this since it seems to me we are not using WINS.
WINS is Window
On Friday 07 July 2006 19:27, Craig White wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 16:54 -0700, Huck wrote:
> > This link may be of some assistance to those updating from Samba 2.
> >
> > http://www.phptr.com/articles/article.asp?p=419048&rl=1
>
>
> Since the official Samba documentation is authoritativ
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 16:54 -0700, Huck wrote:
> This link may be of some assistance to those updating from Samba 2.
>
> http://www.phptr.com/articles/article.asp?p=419048&rl=1
Since the official Samba documentation is authoritative and actually
covers this subject, pointing to another 3rd pa
This link may be of some assistance to those updating from Samba 2.
http://www.phptr.com/articles/article.asp?p=419048&rl=1
--Huck
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Hi,
I searched through the list archives and saw this question asked but not
answered, so I'm hoping someone can help me.
I am trying to use rpcclient to set a printer driver and it's failing
with the error message: WERR_ACCESS_DENIED. I've included the full
output of the command at debug 4
This is on Solaris 8.
Eric
Also...which Distro are you installing this on?
I installed on a CentOS 4 and it was VERY different than both my Debian
and FC4 installs...
--Huck
Steve A wrote:
Hi Eric
I would be inclined to start small and get bigger. Look in the official
HowTo at the chapte
Hi
It seems that your Client VENUS tries to register itself to the WINS server it is
configured to. Check what WINS server is configured using "ipconfig /all" in
a DOS prompt.
If your client's WINS server is configured to be a.b.c.d and your domain PDC IP is a.b.c.d but the "wins
server" pa
Hi guys,
I'm new so hi to everyone.
Anyway, i'm having a little problem getting Samba and OpenLdap to play
together nicely.
Its not a Samba problem, in the sense that everything works fine using
smbpasswd
etc and its not an OpenLDAP problem in the sense that the lookups
and so forth happen
Hello Craig et al,
I didn't think it was possible that you would refute everything that I
said without checking a single bit of information but you definitely did
that.
Jeez, what did I say that was objectionable? I believe that everything I
said was factual, and I certainly didn't think I w
>>> Yes, we have 2 DC (darthsith and darthvader ;) )
>
>> Could be a replication issue. Sometimes the krb5 libs
>> don't always communicate with the same DC as smbd.
>> We're trying to fix this some in 3.0.23.
>
> So there´s no way at this moment that I can make this
> computer join the ADS? Wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mariano Sokal wrote:
>>> Yes, we have 2 DC (darthsith and darthvader ;) )
>
>> Could be a replication issue. Sometimes the krb5 libs
>> don't always communicate with the same DC as smbd.
>> We're trying to fix this some in 3.0.23.
>
> So there´s no
Mariano Sokal wrote:
>> get_service_ticket: kerberos_kinit_password
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SYSTEMMASTER.COM.AR failed:
>> Preauthentication failed
>
>> Do you have more than one DC? I'm cleaning up this code some
>> right now actually. The failure is coming when net is trying
>> to derive the salt
Also...which Distro are you installing this on?
I installed on a CentOS 4 and it was VERY different than both my Debian
and FC4 installs...
--Huck
Steve A wrote:
Hi Eric
I would be inclined to start small and get bigger. Look in the official
HowTo at the chapter "Fast Start: Cure for Impat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mariano Sokal wrote:
>> get_service_ticket: kerberos_kinit_password
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SYSTEMMASTER.COM.AR failed:
>> Preauthentication failed
>
>> Do you have more than one DC? I'm cleaning up this code some
>> right now actually. The failure is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Evans wrote:
> The documentation always refers to it in /etc/sama/.
> Alright, that does it, from now on I'm making all
> my smb.conf changes in BOTH places
:-) How about just running 'smbd -b | grep CONFIG' to
find out which one Samba is
Hi Eric
I would be inclined to start small and get bigger. Look in the official
HowTo at the chapter "Fast Start: Cure for Impatience". In my hard copy,
example 2.3.1 lists an anonymous Read-Only Server Configuration. In fact,
work through that chapter and see what works/doesn't work.
If it
> get_service_ticket: kerberos_kinit_password
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@SYSTEMMASTER.COM.AR failed:
> Preauthentication failed
>Do you have more than one DC? I'm cleaning up this code some
>right now actually. The failure is coming when net is trying
>to derive the salt used for DES keys. It's kind of
The documentation always refers to it in /etc/sama/. Alright, that does
it, from now on I'm making all my smb.conf changes in BOTH places
Eric
Alan Gibson wrote:
> Samba 3 does indeed use /etc/samba/smb.conf.
Not by default. When compiling with no tweaks to configure,
the default locat
I didn't think it was possible that you would refute everything that I
said without checking a single bit of information but you definitely did
that.
It's obvious that you merely want to debate and that your request for
help wasn't really a desire to learn anything or fix anything...just a
soapbox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mariano Sokal wrote:
> get_service_ticket: kerberos_kinit_password [EMAIL
> PROTECTED]@SYSTEMMASTER.COM.AR failed:
> Preauthentication failed
Do you have more than one DC? I'm cleaning up this code some
right now actually. The failure is coming w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Gibson wrote:
> Samba 3 does indeed use /etc/samba/smb.conf.
Not by default. When compiling with no tweaks to configure,
the default location is stil /usr/local/samba/lib/. /etc/samba/
is a packaging choice.
cheers, jerry
==
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
malcolm wrote
:
> My question: since I cannot be the only one to
> encounter such behaviour (google verifies that I am
> not alone), why don't the samba developers either
> fix this bug, or disable printing over samba and
> recommend the internet sol
Hi, Volker,
It´s been a while since I´ve sent this topic to the list, but here goes an
update to it ..
We have reinstalled our server with Fedora Core 3, 32 bit version,
samba-3.0.8-0.pre1.3, and Squid-2.5.STABLE-12, all with the same
configurations as in the Fedora Core 5 installation, and ever
probably would be much easier if you understood Windows Networking
principles.
I'm sure it would, I'm trying my best to learn them. In the meantime I
have a bunch of users who are impatient to get this thing working ASAP and
who are not patient enough to wait around while I read an entire b
Samba 3 works fine for thousands if not millions of people. It is
significantly better than Samba 2 and though the commands seem to be the
same, the results are different.
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 17:45 -0400, Eric Evans wrote:
> This is very strange and frustrating. Our users complained that they
This is very strange and frustrating. Our users complained that they
weren't able to get ANY Samba access, not even being able to map a network
drive (forgetting for now about that domain logon thing for a while). So I
went into the /etc/samba/smb.conf and took out all of the statements that
I found out the problem, and am I ever pissed!
Let me explain. My network has 42 staff users (teachers) and 600+ student
users belonging to various groups. (kindergarten, Grade10, etc)
There is no way that I am going to manually enter...
...useradd username
...passwd username
...smbpasswd -a us
Samba 3 does indeed use /etc/samba/smb.conf.
alan
On 7/7/06, Eric Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I recently upgraded from Samba 2 to 3. I noticed that in the Samba By
Example documentation they refer to the smb.conf as being located in
/etc/samba. In my version 2 implementation of S
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Eric Evans wrote:
My apologies, I'm terribly sorry to belabor these PDC issues to the point
where everyone is undoubtedly tired of hearing about them, but I have become
absolutely obsessed with trying to solve this PDC problem. Here is what is
happening now. I'm trying to
My apologies, I'm terribly sorry to belabor these PDC issues to the point
where everyone is undoubtedly tired of hearing about them, but I have
become absolutely obsessed with trying to solve this PDC problem. Here is
what is happening now. I'm trying to connect to the Samba server which is
s
Hello from Buenos Aires.
I am getting the following error when I do the net ads join command:
get_service_ticket: kerberos_kinit_password [EMAIL
PROTECTED]@SYSTEMMASTER.COM.AR failed: Preauthentication failed
I am running Debian, kernel 2.4.18 (geez, I should upgrade).
I searched e
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006, Eric Evans wrote:
Hello,
Sorry to be a pest, but I need to try to get some clarification of how the
machine name works when setting up a machine account on the Samba server.
The Samba How-To page
http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/samba-pdc.html#id
I've tried some internet and list searching, but I haven't been able to
find anybody with the same issue. It's hard to search for "samba cifs
force user problem" because it hits nearly every samba tech support
question ever asked.
The smbfs kernel module disappeared from the stock fedora kernels
Eric wrote:
> My boss claims that it is possible to set up a PC as a Samba client in
> such a way that every Windows user who logs in to that PC will
> automatically be connected to a certain designated Samba share,
> without the user himself having to map the network drive to the Samba
> share. T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have this exact same error and have posted multiple times regarding
the issue - I've not received any response so far. Additionally, the
ONLY Google results that appear when you search for this are completely
useless in regards to solving the issue.
Eric Evans wrote:
I'm STILL having difficulty getting my PC client to connect to the
domain. I've got the IP address of the Samba server entered into the
list of WINS servers in the network control panel on the client
machine. And I've got a machine account set up for the client machine
(wit
Printing from a Windoze box to a linux printer has alway been incredibly slow
via Samba.
After I purchased a new printer it was so slow that most Window clients gave
up.
The solution is to avoid Samba alltogether and set up the printer on Windows
as an internet printer, i.e.:
http://mylinux:6
Hi Eric
Eric Evans wrote:
> Sorry to be a pest, but I need to try to get some clarification of how the
> machine name works when setting up a machine account on the Samba
> server. The Samba How-To page
> http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/samba-pdc.html#id2536400
> talks
Hello,
Sorry to be a pest, but I need to try to get some clarification of how the
machine name works when setting up a machine account on the Samba
server. The Samba How-To page
http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/samba-pdc.html#id2536400
talks about the "common error"
Hi!
I have a samba PDC over LDAP which works fine allowing roaming
profiles on XP. Now I have some questions about the way samba
accesses the profile share :)
Is necessary to samba or windows that the profile belongs to the user
and to its group? Can I have a profile with uid/gid and allo
Hello,
I recently upgraded from Samba 2 to 3. I noticed that in the Samba By
Example documentation they refer to the smb.conf as being located in
/etc/samba. In my version 2 implementation of Samba the smb.conf was
always located in /usr/local/samba/lib. So does version 3 of Samba look
for
That does not appear to be the issue. I use webmin all the time.
The problem I am having is that:
I did create machine accounts
I can login to samba pdc from a win2k machine
But only if the user I login as has their primary group set to root.
It must be some kind of permission th
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 11:01 -0400, Eric Evans wrote:
> I'm STILL having difficulty getting my PC client to connect to the
> domain. I've got the IP address of the Samba server entered into the list
> of WINS servers in the network control panel on the client machine. And
> I've got a machine a
Sure. I will download it and give it a try. I will let you know what I
find out.
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 10:27 AM
To: Trimble, Ronald D
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] How do I
I'm STILL having difficulty getting my PC client to connect to the
domain. I've got the IP address of the Samba server entered into the list
of WINS servers in the network control panel on the client machine. And
I've got a machine account set up for the client machine (with a $ sign at
the e
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 10:43 -0400, Eric Evans wrote:
> I'm a bit worried about this. I really don't like the idea of an account
> on the Sun that does not have a password associated with it.
Eric, the unix account will have a disabled password
(machinename$:x:uid:gid:gecos:home:shell) depending
Eric Evans wrote:
> I'm a bit worried about this. I really don't like the idea of an account
> on the Sun that does not have a password associated with it.
Taken from the official howto:
" Manually creating a Machine Trust Account using this method is the
equivalent of creating a Machine Trust
I'm a bit worried about this. I really don't like the idea of an account
on the Sun that does not have a password associated with it.
Eric
You don't need to worry about passwords for machine accounts. The passwords
are automatically negotiated when the machine logs onto the domain for the
fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
andy liebman wrote:
> Note that rpc.statd also seems to be out of control.
> Don't know if it is related.
Are you re-exporting nfs file systems by chance?
ok. Steps to trouble shoot.
* Figure out what IP address is associated with that
smbd pro
Hi,
You need something like this in your tree to store the next free uid and
gid:
dn: cn=NextFreeUnixId,o=youro
objectClass: inetOrgPerson
objectClass: sambaUnixIdPool
cn: NextFreeUnixId
sn: NextFreeUnixId
structuralObjectClass: inetOrgPerson
uidNumber: 29205
gidNumber: 1426
Take a look at smbld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trimble, Ronald D wrote:
> Deleting that file seemed to have done the
> trick. What does that file do?
Cache information about users and groups in the domain.
> What made you suspect this?
The call to wcache_flush_cache(). I've seen this backtrac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:17:13AM -0400, Trimble, Ronald D wrote:
>
>> ReiserFS is a problem? It's the default. I
>> would imagine you would be seeing tons of complaints
>> if it was due to the fs, don't you agree?
>
> Jus
Hi,
I use samba 3.0.20, and i use the smbldap-tool 0.9.2.
I've got a problem to add a workstation to the domain using the
following script
add machine script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w -d /dev/null -c 'Machine
Account' -s /bin/false '%u'
The machine is included into the ldap hosts tree but
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:17:13AM -0400, Trimble, Ronald D wrote:
> ReiserFS is a problem? It's the default. I would imagine you would be
> seeing tons of complaints if it was due to the fs, don't you agree?
Just try ext3.
Volker
pgpM81XS8LFg3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscrib
ReiserFS is a problem? It's the default. I would imagine you would be
seeing tons of complaints if it was due to the fs, don't you agree?
-Original Message-
From: Volker Lendecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volker
Lendecke
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 10:15 AM
To: Trimble, Rona
Eric Evans wrote:
> OK, one little question here: what about passwords for the machine
> accounts? How should such passwords be chosen, and how does the client
> machine know to use the right password when logging on to the domain?
You don't need to worry about passwords for machine accounts. Th
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:08:24AM -0400, Trimble, Ronald D wrote:
> Maybe I jumped the gun a little too soon Jerry. After successfully
> logging into the server a few times, it has stopped working again. That
> file has been recreated.
>
> I am using the default SUSE Linux 10.1 install. Any
Maybe I jumped the gun a little too soon Jerry. After successfully
logging into the server a few times, it has stopped working again. That
file has been recreated.
I am using the default SUSE Linux 10.1 install. Any other ideas?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMA
OK, one little question here: what about passwords for the machine
accounts? How should such passwords be chosen, and how does the client
machine know to use the right password when logging on to the domain?
Thanks!
Eric
Every machine that joins a Windows domain has a machine account, becaus
Deleting that file seemed to have done the trick. What does that file
do? What made you suspect this?
-Original Message-
From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 7:47 AM
To: Trimble, Ronald D
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] How do
Eric Evans wrote:
Hi Eric, why not start by posting your smb.conf?
> OK, I hate to seem like I'm terribly dense here, but I guess I am. What
> is a "machine account"? I'm only familiar with accounts for users, not
> machines.
Every machine that joins a Windows domain has a machine account, bec
I'm still not able to connect to the Samba server as a PDC from the client
machine. I've added root as a Samba account in smbpasswd, and I've added
the IP address of the Samba server machine to the WINS server list on the
client. But I still get a "network path not found" when I try to configu
Andy,
Luckily, the client this was happening to's contract ran out. I haven't
had the problem with any other clients, but I suspect it had something
to do with the kernel it was running on...that was the only thing that
differed between the boxes that did and didn't work. (It was an older
k
Over the past few months, I have seen many postings here about runaway
smbd processes with Samba versions 3.0.20 and above. Personally, it
never happened to me until today. Also, I have stuck with Samba 3.0.13
on most of my machines because of THIS reported issue and a couple of
other issues th
you run smbpasswd -a root on the sun samba server. if you don't have a
DHCP server, then add the IP of your sun samba server into the WINS
server ip line in the network properties of the windows client PC you
are trying to add to the domain.
Eric Evans wrote:
Thanks. It's still not working t
Eric Evans wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea if there is anything further that I need to do
> to set up the Samba server as a PDC?
Hi Eric,
You need to either, a) first create a machine account in UNIX and Samba for
that client you're adding, or b) make use of the 'add machine script' in
smb.c
Thanks. It's still not working though. A couple of things concern me
about your advice. First of all I can't smbpasswd -a root on our Windows
server because we don't have a Windows server. Secondly we can't change
the network properties on the DHCP server because we don't have a DHCP
server
you have to use root with root's password. smbpasswd -a root also on
the windows server you need to set the IP address of the samba server as
your WINS server in the network properties or on your DHCP server settings.
Eric Evans wrote:
I'm still trying to set up our Samba server as a PDC. I
I'm still trying to set up our Samba server as a PDC. I tried to do this
yesterday and couldn't get my clients to recognize the server as a domain
controller. Someone on this list suggested that I upgrade my Samba from
version 2 to 3. I've done that, and things seem to be a little better than
Dear All,
I have succefully configured a samba using ldap running on suse 10.1 to
join a win 2k sp4 AD,
All is working well, getent passwd, group, shadow i can even login to the
linux bos using the AD user names
But when a windows machine is accessing the SMB server it will browse the
share d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trimble, Ronald D wrote:
> I have a server that has a smb_panic every time
> I start/restart the winbind service. How do I go about
> fixing this? Here is the output from the winbind log file.
>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Masopust, Christian wrote:
> with the supplied Makefile(.in) I'm not able to make pam_winbind.so
> on Solaris (8 and 9).
>
> So i had a look at the Makefile and found out that there seem's to
> be some things missing :-))
Was fixed just after re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Gibson wrote:
> for instance, will the following allow user2 to write to [share]?
>
> [share]
> read only = yes
> valid users = user1 user2
> read list = user1
> write list = user2
>
> thanks in advance for any info...
Yes. user2 will have wr
> Why is NFS file locking non functional?
I thought the initial problem report was that Samba tends to
hang when re-exporting NFS shares. A very likely candidate
for this kind of problem is that NFS locking does not work
correctly. So I proposed to use 'posix locking = no'. If
that solves the prob
Volker Lendecke wrote:
As long as you only access the files from Windows, no. Samba
does the locking itself. But as your locking on NFS looks
broken anyway, there can't be any posix processes accessing
the files and doing locking.
Volker
Hello
Why is NFS file locking non functional?
Is this a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Looking at the winbind logs, I have found the following errors:
Jul 7 08:00:01 desarrollo winbindd[1952]: [2006/07/07 08:00:01, 0]
lib/util_sid.c:string_to_sid(285)
Jul 7 08:00:01 desarrollo winbindd[1952]: [2006/07/07 08:00:01, 0]
lib/util_sid.c
Hi All:
When I usign nmblookup to query my domain controller, I got different results:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:# nmblookup -A ADDomain.com
Looking up status of 169.254.211.91
No reply from 169.254.211.91
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:# nmblookup -A ADDomain.com
Looking up status of 172.23.26.204
WIN-2003
92 matches
Mail list logo
