Hi
I have problem connecting with windows XP clients to a sub directory
The subdirectory is setup as follows in die smb.conf
[wwwshare]
comment = www share
path = /var/www/html
valid users = wwwuser
public = no
writable = yes
printable = no
create mask = 0765
I have user level
On Sat, Jul 22, 2006 at 04:33:35AM +0200, Mauro Sacchetto wrote:
I've a Windows printer, configured via CUPS.
In spite of the fact that it works fine, in the
browser page of CUPS (Linux client side)
I read: Can not get the ticket cache for root.
How can I eliminate this message?
ATM there is
Hi
I am using samba-3.0.11-5 in a windows 2003 domain. every thing
is working fine but some times when users from windows XP machines try
to browse samba shares from 'run' menu by using \\filer01 or
\\IP of samba server, they cant go to shares.they get error 'The
specified format is
I'm curious if anyone has suggestions about a problem we have encountered.
We have recently upgraded a 2.2.8a server to 3.0.23. The server in question
is running Solaris 8 with NIS+. Storage is from our SAN. Since the
migration, we have found that we no longer have access to several shares.
We have a department using a DOS based application (written in C) within an MS
window. By this I mean that the application is text based, and has no mouse
capabilities at all.
The application object code and its database all reside in a departmental share
on our Samba instance on a Solaris
yes, but not for mount point1 or point2
Marian wrote:
Yuo have homes guest ok =yes .
rich [EMAIL PROTECTED] napísal v správe
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have samba version 3.0.22 installed on solaris 8.
I have added users with smbpasswd -a.
When mounting from an XP machine passwords
hello
i cant manage groups with usrmgr and the configuration below
debian sarge, samba 3.0.22, openldap 2.2.23, smbldap-tools 0.8.7.
usrmgr reports he cant find the groups.
is it solved by samba 3.0.23a ? does anybody report enhancement after
upgrading to 3.0.23a ?
Regards
ELH
--
Éric LE
Hi,
got the same problem, and there is a mysterious group Users, the
usermanager doesn't start, it says The specified local group does not exist.
net groupmap list | tail:
IZ ICT (S-1-5-21-2651798370-710026074-3531216960-3179) - IZ ICT
IZ PZ (S-1-5-21-2651798370-710026074-3531216960-3181) -
Dear all!
Since several days I'm trying to get Samba's unix password sync to work
for me, but I still have problems. I'm using the Samba 3.0.22 binaries
that come with Ubuntu 6.06 and this is the [global] section of my smb.conf:
[global]
workgroup = TEST
domain logons = yes
preferred master
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gilles Vautour wrote:
I'm curious if anyone has suggestions about a problem
we have encountered. We have recently upgraded a 2.2.8a
server to 3.0.23. The server in question is running Solaris
8 with NIS+. Storage is from our SAN. Since the
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
You win the award for the biggest change in an upgrade :-)
Oh, what an honor! ;-)
Please retest 3.0.23a (released on Friday) as there were
several common bugs in 3.0.23 that might be relevant.
Hm, I'll try to do that, but I'm not really a Linux professional.
Hello,
There is FreeBSD-6.1 box with gcc 3.4.4 compiler (the default).
The box is a member of an ADS domain. Everything was working perfectly with
samba-3.0.22.
After upgrading it to samba-3.0.23_1 from FreeBSD ports collection, the
following problem appeared.
The system does not seem to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeroen Vriesman wrote:
And now for the strange thing, when I delete
the group Users form ldap, it is automatically
re-created, and adding a group Users in the normal
way, with groupmapping doesn't prevent it from being
created.
smbd will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
No. But I have reproduced the error you reported though.
I expect it is specific to ldapsam. Attached is a patch.
For what it's worth, I have no problem running usrmgr.exe
with the one exception noted.
I've posted
The script
samba-3.0.23a/packaging/RedHat-9/makerpms.sh
doesn't work on a Redhat 9 machine.
It has:
VERSION='3.0.23a'
REVISION='a'
and later:
chown -R ${USERID}.${GRPID} samba-${VERSION}${REVISION}
This would refer to a folder samba-3.0.23aa which doesn't exist.
The attached patch fixes
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
...
The attached patch fixes this problem.
- and breaks other things (bugzilla 3955).
Use it only if you're in a hurry to get 3.0.23a to compile on rh9.
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33
could this problem comes of the migrated accounts i 'net rpc vampired'
from our future ex NT4 domain server ?
ELH
Message original
Sujet: USRMGR and 3.0.23a
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:55:26 +0200
De: éric le hénaff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Forums de discussion:
I still have the problem with domain groups in 3.0.23a with the patch listed on
the website applied. The 'net rpc info' command shows(still):
Domain Name: MATH_CS
Domain SID: S-1-5-21-1882045844-2771900506-1057560041
Sequence number: 1153750888
Num users: 5
Num domain groups: 0
Num local groups:
Hi,
Does anyone know where I can find the idealx's dual-head patch?
I looked for it in idealx's site but I can't find it.
Why isn't that feature available in samba?
Regards
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database:
Hi,
With SAMBA and LDAP as a domain controller, is there a way to specify
which user has permissions to which resource including resources on
remote servers? Eg, user A has access to public share one server and
access to a printer on a different server and user B has access to only
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mogens,
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
...
The attached patch fixes this problem.
- and breaks other things (bugzilla 3955).
Use it only if you're in a hurry to get 3.0.23a
to compile on rh9.
For the record, I knew about this when we shipped 3.0.23a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Money wrote:
I still have the problem with domain groups in 3.0.23a with the patch listed
on the website applied. The 'net rpc info' command shows(still):
Domain Name: MATH_CS
Domain SID: S-1-5-21-1882045844-2771900506-1057560041
[sorry for the full quote but I have to bring this up again, see below]
Me said:
I just compiled samba 3.0.23 on our Sun Solaris 8 server. 3.0.22 was
running fine and I used the same compiler options for 3.0.23.
$ ./configure --with-acl-support --prefix=/usr/local/samba3023
--with-quotas
Bill Platt wrote:
Hi,
With SAMBA and LDAP as a domain controller, is there a way to specify
which user has permissions to which resource including resources on
remote servers? Eg, user A has access to public share one server and
access to a printer on a different server and user B has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Gross wrote:
After 'make install', I can still login, but smbclient
gives me an error message if I try to list the content
of a directory:
Domain=[ERS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23]
smb: \ ls
do_list: [\*]
Here's the output from 'net groupmap list verbose':
Domain Admins
SID : S-1-5-21-1882045844-2771900506-1057560041-512
Unix gid : 512
Unix group: Domain Admins
Group type: Domain Group
Comment : Netbios Domain Administrators
Domain Users
SID
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Money wrote:
Here's the output from 'net groupmap list verbose':
Domain Admins
SID : S-1-5-21-1882045844-2771900506-1057560041-512
Unix gid : 512
Unix group: Domain Admins
Group type: Domain Group
Tried upgrading a couple of working samba-3.0.22 boxes that are currently
members of our ads domain to samba-3.0.23a.
Before the upgrade:
$ kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ net ads testjoin
$ net ads join
works fine.
After the upgrade
$ net ads testjoin
$ net ads join
both hang. So I tried
$ net ads
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rex,
$ net ads testjoin -d4
and found that it returns:
[2006/07/24 10:12:27, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:get_dc_list(1502)
get_dc_list: returning 2 ip addresses in an unordered list
[2006/07/24 10:12:27, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:get_dc_list(1503)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Money wrote:
I added the new index, but not the new schema. I
just added that it appears to be working fine
now. Thanks!
Great! Thanks for the feedback.
cheers, jerry
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rex,
$ net ads testjoin -d4
and found that it returns:
[2006/07/24 10:12:27, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:get_dc_list(1502)
get_dc_list: returning 2 ip addresses in an unordered list
[2006/07/24 10:12:27, 4]
Gerald (Jerry) Carter said:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Gross wrote:
After 'make install', I can still login, but smbclient
gives me an error message if I try to list the content
of a directory:
Domain=[ERS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.23]
smb: \ ls
do_list: [\*]
We have a RedHat samba server to which a whole department of Windows
connects directly when a user logs onto the Windows computer. So the
server is working fine.
We have a rebuilt Windows XP Pro computer that does not make the
connection directly. The user has to log into the server
Jeremy,
I was in a position (last night) to upgrade to 3.0.23a.
Again, I was using 3.0.21c.
If smbd goes into the D state, we can at least eliminate the possibility
that it is an unexpected 3.0.21c bug.
Thanks,
Bill Pappas - System Integration Engineer - SAN
St. Jude Children's Research
Hi
we had an comparable issue with gpfs clusterfilesystem from IBM at
11/2005 I posted on samba technical (subject tdb_lock problem on gpfs
filesystem). Smbd went to D state sometimes to in this case.
Mostly we recognized the problem with the tdb files of the printer (
the samba server was
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:34:44AM +1000, Ron Daniel wrote:
We have a department using a DOS based application (written in C) within an
MS window. By this I mean that the application is text based, and has no
mouse capabilities at all.
The application object code and its database all
Alle 10:45, lunedì 24 luglio 2006, Lars Müller ha scritto:
Does your URI - configured at CUPS level - to your printer attached to
the Microsoft system includes the username and password or is this
printer available without authentication for anonymous printing?
The access is public.
I'll make
Thanks for the reply.
I will keep this in mind the next time this happens (your strace suggestion).
I upgraded from 3.0.21c to 3.0.23a as there were several bug fixes that could
be tied to this locking issue with vxfs, though the release notes do not
discuss much on file locking. The issue
Hi all,
in my previous message (about usermanager not working, showing the specified
local group does not exist) I wrote that net groupmap list showed all the
group mappings.
well.. almost all, there is one group which doesn't have a groupmapping:
net groupmap list | tail:
IZ ICT
Hello all! I have spent a lot of time chasing down what I think is a
bug in smbldap-tools. It seems like many other people have experienced
the same problem too. It was pretty hard to triage so I'm writing it
down here.
The symptom of the problem is that Windows machines cannot join your
Rex Dieter wrote:
$ net ads testjoin -d4
and found that it returns:
[2006/07/24 10:12:27, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:get_dc_list(1502)
get_dc_list: returning 2 ip addresses in an unordered list
[2006/07/24 10:12:27, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:get_dc_list(1503)
get_dc_list: 2.0.0.0:389
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 02:07:47PM -0500, Pappas, Bill wrote:
Jeremy,
I was in a position (last night) to upgrade to 3.0.23a.
Again, I was using 3.0.21c.
If smbd goes into the D state, we can at least eliminate the possibility
that it is an unexpected 3.0.21c bug.
Thanks - yes I
Doesn't the removal of /var/cache/samba change the mappings? In other
words, will the permissions which have been previously set now reference
different groups?
Thanks,
Todd Jones
==
The information contained in this email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrei Nazarenko wrote:
get_dc_list: returning 10 ip addresses in an unordered list
[2006/07/24 21:47:13, 4] libsmb/namequery.c:get_dc_list(1503)
get_dc_list: 10.254.212.194:389 10.254.212.192:389 10.66.2.209:389
40.50.50.52:389
I did not receive any response when I originally posted, so, here goes
another try.
--
My Samba server is a domain member to a Win2k ADS domain. I have a domain
group where some members of the group can access a particular share, while
others cannot. If the user tries to login from a
after upgrading from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23a I can't get at any of my shares, except
public. All worked before.
here is my smb.conf file.
everytime I try to browse or mount any of the other shares it errors out and
tells me the shares dont exist, this is with konqueror, winxp, or smb4k.
Any
Hi,
This may sound like an odd question, but I was wondering if it would
be feasable to run samba inside a minimal environment, such as that of
initramfs. The idea would be to have a small system that will mount
one partition and share it. The system will do nothing else (no
console support
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 12:34:55AM -0400, Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
after upgrading from 3.0.22 to 3.0.23a I can't get at any of my shares,
except
public. All worked before.
here is my smb.conf file.
everytime I try to browse or mount any of the other shares it errors out and
tells me
Author: jerry
Date: 2006-07-24 12:00:03 + (Mon, 24 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 1017
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=samba-webrev=1017
Log:
adding fix for usrmgr.exe and local groups to the patches page
Added:
trunk/patches/patch-3.0.23a-samr_alias.patch
Author: jerry
Date: 2006-07-24 12:05:20 + (Mon, 24 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17217
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17217
Log:
Fix a couple of smbldap_open(): Cannot open when not root bugs
when viewing or modifying local group membership.
Modified:
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2006-07-24
00:00:35.0 +
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2006-07-25 00:00:19.0
+
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
-Build status as of Mon Jul 24 00:00:02 2006
+Build status as of Tue Jul
Author: jra
Date: 2006-07-25 00:16:45 + (Tue, 25 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17220
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17220
Log:
If we're going to fail a write with an errno, make
sure we return -1.
Jeremy.
Modified:
Author: abartlet
Date: 2006-07-25 00:53:03 + (Tue, 25 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17221
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17221
Log:
Add some integer wrap parinoia to data_blob_append().
Andrew Bartlett
Modified:
Author: abartlet
Date: 2006-07-25 00:57:27 + (Tue, 25 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17222
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17222
Log:
Change the function prototypes for the GENSEc and TLS socket creation
routines to return an NTSTATUS. This should help
Author: abartlet
Date: 2006-07-25 02:21:54 + (Tue, 25 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17223
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17223
Log:
In some protocols it is not possible to negoitate off some features,
without the agreement of the peer. This can cause
Author: abartlet
Date: 2006-07-25 02:57:51 + (Tue, 25 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17224
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17224
Log:
Accept the start-tls extended request. Getting OpenLDAP to recognise
our certificate, and proceed with the connection is
Author: abartlet
Date: 2006-07-25 03:41:32 + (Tue, 25 Jul 2006)
New Revision: 17225
WebSVN:
http://websvn.samba.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=revroot=sambarev=17225
Log:
Fix the build by fixing the spelling of START-TLS.
Andrew Bartlett
Modified:
57 matches
Mail list logo
