Yes unless the Windows driver requires a hard direct connection to the
printer. Lexmark is the actual manufacturer of your printer. (Sorry to be the
one to tell you that.) However, if you setup up Windows to look at the port
as if its a direct connection you may be able to cheat a bit. I had
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 01:15, Komal Shah wrote:
>
> Thanks Shaun for quick reply.
>
> I am having trouble with Dell Photo 964.Can I setup raw queue so that
> Windows drive will do the processing ?
>
> Komal
Yes unless the Windows driver requires a hard direct connection to the
printer. Lexma
Shaun Marolf wrote:
It is much easier to have Windows print to a Samba server than it is to print
to Windows from any Unix. I have successfully setup shared printers on a
Samba Server that I had no Linux driver for. Though the server could not
print to the attached printer all my Windows clien
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 00:18, Komal Shah wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have quick question about Printing with Samba.I want to print to
> printer connected to Windows machine.I do not have drive for Linux of
> the printer.Should I create raw queue in Linux to print to Windows printer?
>
> If i do not
Hello,
I have quick question about Printing with Samba.I want to print to
printer connected to Windows machine.I do not have drive for Linux of
the printer.Should I create raw queue in Linux to print to Windows printer?
If i do not have suitable driver for Linux for printer is it still
possi
Still No Go. Printer isn't being seen. Going to mess with Firewall and see if
that's the issue. Don't think so since I don't remember enabling it ever but
who knows. Some distros pull stunts behind your back. BTW its 3.0.023b on FC5
--Shaun
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 16:49, Dale Schroeder wrote:
i mean the configure options.. while building samba and open-ldap from SRC
rpm
thank a lot...
regards
jerrynikky.
On 8/29/06, Logan Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 08/28/2006 05:30 AM, updatemyself . escreveu:
>> > can anyone help me to know
>> > what all are the compailing option to us
Hey List-
I've got 2 samba servers.
PDC: FreeBSD 5.4; samba: 3.0.23 name: bugs
member server: FreeBSD 6-stable; samba: 3.0.23 name: daffy
note: config files are at the bottom of the email
The PDC was running an older version, but I just upgraded and it didn't fix
the below issue. The membe
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:47:52PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>
> No it shouldn't - it's a bug. But I think it's something I've
> fixed in current SAMBA_3_0 svn. I'll look at the SAMBA_3_0_23
> svn (still using the older locking code, about to be shipped
> as 3.0.23c).
Ok, took a quick look at
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 09:41:15PM +0100, Andrew Wilson wrote:
> Jeremy,
>
> I have located the source of this error in our config' - we had "posix
> locking=no" in force on the share we are using to host the NT/XP
> profiles (See the definition below). When we remove this (to allow the
> defau
Jeremy,
I have located the source of this error in our config' - we had "posix
locking=no" in force on the share we are using to host the NT/XP
profiles (See the definition below). When we remove this (to allow the
default posix locking) the errors go away - they were occuring during
log on a
Hi,
I am experiencing difficulty with a Program that resides on my Linux Server
and is accessed from Win XP stations.
The program is a tutoring program that uses flash files (swf) on the server
that are displayed on the clients.
When doing an update recently I got several strange error
I can't seem to get a Windows XP Media Center Edition system to see a very
simple print share.
[global]
workgroup = HOME
realm = SHAUN
server string = Samba Server
security = SHARE
encrypt passwords = No
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max
Hello,
We are currently experiencing an issue when trying to add members to a group
on a server running Samba 3.0.20b-3.4-SUSE(SLES9). It appears that we have
reached the size limit for the specified group in the group file. This group
is the only one that is large in size within the group fil
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, David Williams wrote:
I have a Samba server 3.0.22 pdc on Gentoo Linux with a ldap backend all
working fine. I am now going to add a bdc to the setup. It seems that
the privilege info is stored locally rather than in ldap. I suspect that
it's in account_policy.tdb but I'm not
Hello
I have a Samba server 3.0.22 pdc on Gentoo Linux with a ldap backend all
working fine. I am now going to add a bdc to the setup. It seems that
the privilege info is stored locally rather than in ldap. I suspect that
it's in account_policy.tdb but I'm not sure. I can see the accounts on
the b
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 00:57 +0930, Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 12:09 -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> > Run it in a terminal, check for manpages of your
> > distribution, try to increase debug/log level.
>
> Wierd, it seems to work from the command line (I just past
Anybody with a similar problem? Or profile-portability would be so easy
and only for me doesn't work? :(
Imre
Bolya Imre wrote:
Hello!
I'm using Samba as PDC in a small company (~40 computers), the
environment is the following:
Gentoo linux 2.6.14-hardened-r5, Samba 3.0.22-r2, OpenLDAP 2.3.2
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 12:21, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> I've attached the patch that is included for 3.0.23c.
Are you planning to update your patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-1.diffs.gz to
include this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https:/
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 00:57 +0930, Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 12:09 -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> > That's the reason of my question. BH is really bad. The
> > helper probably is missing something. Try to strace the command
> > and see what files it is trying to
We have trouble installing samba4 and we can´t found documentation about
setup, join domains, etc...
We use rsync command to download samba
rsync -avz samba.org::ftp/unpacked/samba4 .
and when run ./autogen.sh to generate configure files return the following
error:
./autogen.sh: running script7mkv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> My Samba-Server is member of a large ADS-Domain.
> After the upgrade, file based Usermapping didn't
> work anymore... better: it worked TWICE. (I
> once opened a PR for that a few years ago :-).
> So, with LogLevel 3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale Schroeder wrote:
>>
>> It's the same as saying 'admin users = +users'.
>>
> I understand that "@" refers to groups, but what
> is the significance of "+" in a declaration? I see
> it used in this list all the time, but without
> explanation.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
azzouz wrote:
> hi,
>
> could i update my samba schema without changing
> anything under ldap entry ?
Please read the WHATSNEW.txt
cheers, jerry
=
Samba
It's the same as saying 'admin users = +users'.
I understand that "@" refers to groups, but what is the significance of
"+" in a declaration? I see it used in this list all the time, but
without explanation.
Dale
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instru
On 08/28/2006 05:30 AM, updatemyself . escreveu:
> can anyone help me to know
> what all are the compailing option to use.. while build my samba and
> open-ldap rpm from sourse.
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, updatemyself . wrote:
what about.. ldap options..?
any one can help?
I rebuilt Samba for Sla
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 12:09 -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> Run it in a terminal, check for manpages of your
> distribution, try to increase debug/log level.
Wierd, it seems to work from the command line (I just pasted in the YR
line from the previous log):
# /usr/bin/ntlm_auth -
hi,
could i update my samba schema without changing anything under ldap entry ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
hi,
could i use the tow samba schemas :
the last one and the new one, all under samba 3 PDC server.
thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
I've seen this problem mentioned many times in the various FAQs and
How-Tos on the Internet, but none of the solutions presented therein
have worked for me.
[global]
workgroup = UNIX
server string = OPTIMUS
interfaces = eth0
log level = 1
log file = /var/
hi,
I have installed the samba 3 release. but i don't update my ldap server.
to use previous ldap release using the old samba shema we can put
ldapsam_compat under smb.conf.
all seem to work fine but my samba root couldn't connect from windows
and so can't integrate windows wrokstation in the d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/29/2006 11:17 AM, Kevin Shanahan escreveu:
> On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 10:56 -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
>
>>On 08/29/2006 10:47 AM, Kevin Shanahan escreveu:
>>[...]
>>
>>>Internet Explorer still fails, but I see something in the logs n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/29/2006 11:19 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for a way, to synchronize the linux/unix passwd file with
> the smbpasswd file. The best would be if passwd triggers also smbpasswd,
> or something like a daemon who synchr
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 00:56, fname lname wrote:
> oh, last thing is there a way to make this setting default so
> everything I create an user it auto flags the person to change
> password on signon?
Just make it part of your script that adds users.
I use this script which allows me to add as
Hello,
I'm looking for a way, to synchronize the linux/unix passwd file with
the smbpasswd file. The best would be if passwd triggers also smbpasswd,
or something like a daemon who synchronize them periodical. I've
allready checked around the whole net, but there seems nothing to be
there, that he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
werner maes wrote:
>
> hello
>
> does anybody know what this error means
>
> glibc detected *** (free): invalid next size (normal) : 0x08486b78 ***
>
Looks the program is trying to double free memory or
perhaps trying to free an invalid pointe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
>> > to turn permissions on in samba.conf, then
>> > the net rpc rights grant syntax seem to be
>> > "unstable." This doesn't work:
>> >
>> > net rpc rights grant username SeMachineAccountPrivilege
>>
>> You have to fully qualify
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
beast wrote:
> Since account policy is unique to every user, why there is an
> account_policy.tdb file, why not just added to to ldap just like
> sambaLogonHours?
account_policy.tdb is just the database I used for
storing privilege assignments. Also
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 10:56 -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> On 08/29/2006 10:47 AM, Kevin Shanahan escreveu:
> [...]
> > Internet Explorer still fails, but I see something in the logs now
> > (upped the LogLevel to debug, was at info before):
> >
> > [Tue Aug 29 23:02:37 2006] [debug] m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/29/2006 10:47 AM, Kevin Shanahan escreveu:
[...]
> Internet Explorer still fails, but I see something in the logs now
> (upped the LogLevel to debug, was at info before):
>
> [Tue Aug 29 23:02:37 2006] [debug] mod_ntlm_winbind.c(529): [client
>
On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 09:16 -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/29/2006 08:03 AM, Kevin Shanahan escreveu:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to set up Apache2 with mod_ntlm_winbind so our Windows users
> > can log onto our Intranet automat
hello
does anybody know what this error means
glibc detected *** (free): invalid next size (normal) : 0x08486b78 ***
it occurs when I copy a whole list of files to a client
werner
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/29/2006 04:27 AM, updatemyself . escreveu:
> what about.. ldap options..?
What LDAP options? The ones used to compile? I have a
strong feeling that RPMs have that options, and that you can
also check the documentation for the needed opti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/29/2006 08:03 AM, Kevin Shanahan escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to set up Apache2 with mod_ntlm_winbind so our Windows users
> can log onto our Intranet automatically without having to type in their
> username / password.
Just a suggest
hello all,
my clients log on with a samba 3 PDC.
They are using outlook 2003 against a exchange 2003 sp1 installed on
a w2k3 machine.
they are able to change their password via owa, but not via outlook client.
The owa access is not enabled for all the users...
How do I eventually implement the M
Hi,
I'm trying to set up Apache2 with mod_ntlm_winbind so our Windows users
can log onto our Intranet automatically without having to type in their
username / password.
I've gotten part of the way there, but things aren't behaving the way
I'd like/expect. So far, I've been able to log on using Fi
what about.. ldap options..?
any one can help?
On 8/28/06, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/28/2006 05:30 AM, updatemyself . escreveu:
> Hai All,
>
> can anyone help me to know
> what all are the compailing option to use
El Lunes, 28 de Agosto de 2006 16:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
> unix password sync = Yes
unix password sync = no
at the moment to my I work myself
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
fname lname wrote:
oh, last thing is there a way to make this setting default so
everything I create an user it auto flags the person to change
password on signon?
If you're using ldap backend, just tell your add user script to set
sambaPwdMustChange attribute less than current time.
btw, pls d
49 matches
Mail list logo
