On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 10:53:25PM -0400, Cybionet wrote:
> Greeting,
>
> I set usershare max shares to 10, and then with an user (and with
> different user) I add 15 shares definition . When I use the net
> usershare list -l , I see all the 15 usershares and can access to these
> shares with
Greeting,
I set usershare max shares to 10, and then with an user (and with
different user) I add 15 shares definition . When I use the net
usershare list -l , I see all the 15 usershares and can access to these
shares with a Windows client. A difference with your example in the
documentati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rene,
> I am running a Samba file server (Version 3.0.22) with 'security =
> share'. Here is one of my share definitions:
>
> [archive]
> path = /var/smb/archive
> writeable = Yes
> username = @staff
> valid users = @s
I've been trying for the past week to get Samba and LDAP to work
together as a PDC on my Gentoo box and allow some XP boxes to get in.
I've read and followed the how-to's (emerged and unmergred more then a
few times)
My LDAP accounts all seem to work when I do the ssh test into them.
Changin
Rober Adkins wrote:
Blaine Armsterd wrote:
Robert Adkins wrote:
Again, I suggest that you test like things with like things, test
a Windows server's file sharing and then Samba file sharing. Test FTP
on a Windows server and then FTP on a Linux server and do this on a
controlled network where on
Hello
I am running a Samba file server (Version 3.0.22) with 'security =
share'. Here is one of my share definitions:
[archive]
path = /var/smb/archive
writeable = Yes
username = @staff
valid users = @staff
First question: In the manpage for smb.conf, it is mentio
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:18:31PM +0200, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
>
> I know. But it is possible (conceptually, at least) to work around
> this issue in the clients. Whence my (slightly off-topic) question
> about changing Windows XP SMB client behavior.
It's almost impossible to get clients to c
Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I agree the VFAT solution is the right way of fixing it, but I could
> > live with workarounds as well. Pre-allocating space before writing is
> > not strictly necessary, as far as I can tell.
>
> There is no workaround possible from Samba. We're *NO
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:40:55PM +0200, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
>
> Is that a "no"? :-)
It's a "not our code" problem.
> I agree the VFAT solution is the right way of fixing it, but I could
> live with workarounds as well. Pre-allocating space before writing is
> not strictly necessary, as far
Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 02:55:58PM +0200, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> > Both strict and not strict allocation policy are painfully slow on
> > VFAT.
> >
> > Does anyone know if it's possible to turn off this "truncate-
> > before-write" behavior in the W
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 02:55:58PM +0200, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> Both strict and not strict allocation policy are painfully slow on
> VFAT.
>
> Does anyone know if it's possible to turn off this "truncate-
> before-write" behavior in the Windows SMB client?
If "strict allocate = no" is slow, t
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 18:55 +0200, Nanni X wrote:
> Hi people,
> I don't receive any post from this lis since Aug 15th. Is this list alive?
What about checking your subscription and the list archives? :)
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce
Samba Team GPL Compliance Officer
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://samba
Hi,
2006/9/4, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 09/02/2006 03:00 PM, Philippe LAUGET escreveu:
>
> Then, when users try to reopen a win session, they get a corrupted new
> profile. This new profile is fully broken, since it's not possible to
> modify any options that affect NT
Hi people,
I don't receive any post from this lis since Aug 15th. Is this list alive?
Regards
Nanni-X
--
Nessun virus nel messaggio in uscita.
Controllato da AVG Antivirus.
Versione: 7.1.405 / Database dei virus: 268.11.7/437 - Data di rilascio:
04/09/06
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to
Is there any error in the samba logs, what error does CFIS get back?
And what kernel/version of CIFS vfs are you using?
Simo.
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 10:39 -0400, Cybionet wrote:
> I use cifs.
> > On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 00:35 -0400, Cybionet wrote:
> >
> >> Greating all,
> >>
> >> I want to use A
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 17:29 +0200, Franz Pfoertsch wrote:
> You are right!
>
> but there is no link from www.samba.org to the wiki, so it is only a hidden
> side.
>
> The developers didn't use the wiki.
This is not true, but we can probably use it more, I agree on this.
> the article about clus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel escribió:
> On 09/03/2006 11:13 AM, Andreas Calvo escreveu:
>>> Hi!
>>> I've been using samba as PDC with a LDAP backend, and everything seems to
>>> work fine but, whenever a user has to auth to samba, it seems that the
>>>
You are right!
but there is no link from www.samba.org to the wiki, so it is only a hidden
side.
The developers didn't use the wiki.
the article about clustering is great, we need some more of stuff like this.
I think about a page about the smb.conf, but it makes no sence when the
developer did
I use cifs.
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 00:35 -0400, Cybionet wrote:
Greating all,
I want to use Acomba (Fortune 1000) with a database on a samba share.
All work perfectly with Windows client, but the Linux client can't open
the database file. Any idea?
Similar thing with Openoffice 2.x. The W
Hi
I have this in my logs of winbond:
[2006/09/04 15:25:05, 0] nsswitch/winbindd.c:process_loop(863)
winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, no idle connection found
and
[2006/09/04 15:23:10, 0]
rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:cli_rpc_pipe_open_noauth(2229)
cli_rpc_pipe_open_noauth: rpc_pipe_b
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 00:35 -0400, Cybionet wrote:
> Greating all,
>
> I want to use Acomba (Fortune 1000) with a database on a samba share.
> All work perfectly with Windows client, but the Linux client can't open
> the database file. Any idea?
>
> Similar thing with Openoffice 2.x. The Window
Hi,
Is it possible to configure Windows 2003 Standard Server to have a domain trust
relationship with a Samba PDC enabled with LDAP ?
If so how ?
regards
shann
---
Sign up and get your 30GB webmail at www.30gigs.com now!
--
To unsubscrib
Jeremy Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 05:51:45PM +0200, Mattias Rönnblom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running Samba 3.0.23a on Linux. One of my share is a USB disk with
> > a FAT32 filesystem.
> >
> > When copying large files from my Windows XP machine to this share,
Philippe LAUGET wrote:
Hi,
We are using Samba 3.0.22 on FreeBSD 5.5 PDC with ldap backend and
roaming profiles.
We meet some difficulties when users logout from some Windows 2000 SP4
clients, and storing their profiles back to the Samba server.
The file NTUSER.DAT seems to be uploaded and
On 04/09/06, Willy Offermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Samba Friends,
I got the following error again and again:
.
Sep 4 10:58:18 sun smbd[94479]: [2006/09/04 10:58:18, 0]
smbd/notify_fam.c:fam_check_reconnect(136)
Sep 4 10:58:18 sun smbd[94479]: failed to connect to FAM service
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/02/2006 03:00 PM, Philippe LAUGET escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> We are using Samba 3.0.22 on FreeBSD 5.5 PDC with ldap backend and
> roaming profiles.
>
> We meet some difficulties when users logout from some Windows 2000 SP4
> clients, and storing their
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The %a variable is not well substituted for XP64.
>
> For separation of profiles of different OS we use the %a variable:
> logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U\%a
>
> With samba3021b the varia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/03/2006 11:13 AM, Andreas Calvo escreveu:
> Hi!
> I've been using samba as PDC with a LDAP backend, and everything seems to
> work fine but, whenever a user has to auth to samba, it seems that the
> query
> that it performs is against the mail at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/04/2006 01:35 AM, Cybionet escreveu:
> Greating all,
> I want to use Acomba (Fortune 1000) with a database on a samba share.
> All work perfectly with Windows client, but the Linux client can't open
> the database file. Any idea?
Differe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/04/2006 07:12 AM, Franz Pfoertsch escreveu:
> Hi people,
Hey! :)
> who maintain the samba wiki at http://wiki.samba.org?
The Samba Community? :)
Including users and developers.
> do we need this wiki or should we use
Hi people,
who maintain the samba wiki at http://wiki.samba.org?
do we need this wiki or should we use the normal documentation?
I made some additons to the wiki, but it seems nobody needs the
information ..
I hope somebody could me explain who should use this documentation
plattform ...
regar
Dear Samba Friends,
I got the following error again and again:
.
Sep 4 10:58:18 sun smbd[94479]: [2006/09/04 10:58:18, 0]
smbd/notify_fam.c:fam_check_reconnect(136)
Sep 4 10:58:18 sun smbd[94479]: failed to connect to FAM service
Sep 4 10:58:23 sun smbd[94479]: [2006/09/04 10:58:23, 0]
Hi,
The %a variable is not well substituted for XP64.
For separation of profiles of different OS we use the %a variable:
logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U\%a
With samba3021b the variable points to Win2K for XP64! This result in
trouble with the user profiles!
Walter
--
To unsubscribe from
33 matches
Mail list logo
