On Wednesday 04 October 2006 1:20 pm, you wrote:
> Cannot change password - "Permission denied" error
>
>
> smbd/chgpasswd.c:findpty(73): findpty: Unable to create
> master/slave pty pair
>
> Make sure that /dev/pts is mounted properly. This will vary depending on
> your server di
log.winbindd
[2006/10/05 17:14:33, 1] smbd/sesssetup.c:reply_spnego_kerberos(310)
Username MYDOMAIN\MYCOMPUTER$ is invalid on this system
I get the above-listed entry in my winbindd log and my smbd log when attempting
to access a simple network share I've created.
[global]
workgroup
Hi,
If process all my mounts prior to the "..." bit below. It looks as if
it's hanging while processing some printer config. On that assumption
and since I don't and never have had any printers attached, I've
commented out the '[printers]' section from smb.conf. No section
contains a 'printable = y
OS: Debian Woody
Samba: 3.0.4
I am seeing the following lines show up over 6713 times over the course of a
day in the log:
[2006/10/05 16:05:55, 2, pid=7233, effective(65534, 65534), real(65534, 0)]
auth/auth.c:check_ntlm_password(305)
check_ntlm_password: authentication for user [GEER] -> [GE
Hi,
I installed and configured Samba 3.0.23c as a domain member. I am
running winbindd on Solaris 8 Sparc. I am seeing a strange behavior
after the configuration. If I issue a "wbinfo -g" I see all the NT
groups. Likewise, if I issue a "wbinfo -u" I see all the NT users.
Continuing on with a "g
Thanks for your concern, anyway!
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 5 de outubro de 2006 13:49
Para: samba@lists.samba.org
Assunto: Re: RES: [Samba] Samba 3.0.23c-1.fc5 problem - groups
-
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
> On 10/05/2006 11:31 AM, Rex Dieter escreveu:
>> groupmap sounds interesting, but does that imply that the old-style group
>> usage is now invalid/deprecated? It seems so (intentionally or not)
>> because I can't seem to get valid users = @group to work with
>>
SOLVED !!!
I found in a closed samba bug that NT workstations need the gid=513,
but I in my smbldap.conf the defaultComputerGid=515.
I think it's strange, to have a machine account in the Domain Users,
not in Domain Computers, but anyway...
And for W2K and XP it does not matter if the gid is 51
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:55:00PM +0200, Sebastian Held wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 14:56 schrieb Peter Daum:
> > maybe some people would be adventurous enough to just try it out:
>
> My results (only 1 measurement taken)
> WinXP64 -> Samba-3.0.23b/SuSE-Linux-9.2:2:08 min
Sebastian Held wrote:
> But the only thing I wanted to show is, that my WinXP has no problems writing
> to a Samba share. Performance is good (at least in my opinion).
... so obviously the problems that I encounter do not occur in all
cases - of course it would be good to know what makes the
dif
Hi again.
I found my error in Samba3-HOWTO:
"
The Machine Trust Account Is Not Accessible
"When I try to join the domain I get the message, "The machine
account for this computer either does not exist or is not
accessible." What's wrong?"
This problem is caused by the PDC not having a suitab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/05/2006 11:31 AM, Rex Dieter escreveu:
> Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
>
>>>I use FC5.
>>>I discovered, for an exemple, if you have a user group with 3 members
>>>(Alan, Baker, Clive), before 3.0.23c this line at smb.conf worked fine:
>>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/05/2006 11:43 AM, Luis Felipe Marzagao/Yahoo escreveu:
> Hi, Felipe.
>
> Thanks a lot for replying.
>
> Are you from Brazil? I ask because of the domain "paranacidade.org". I´m
> from Brazil.
Yes, I am! :)
> Well, I´m not a expert
Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 18:01 schrieb Sebastian Held:
> Maybe rerunning the test will
> clearify that. Otherwise the system is idle.
It has no impact.
pgpdF1XX6SdaB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https:/
Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 17:48 schrieben Sie:
> Have you shut down all other processes including anti-virus to make sure
> there isn't something else causing a wide variance?
Antivirus (Sophos) is running on both machines, but I expect Sophos to do
nothing, because it's not an executable. M
Have you shut down all other processes including anti-virus to make sure
there isn't something else causing a wide variance?
Sebastian Held wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 16:41 schrieben Sie:
How about Windows client to Windows client speeds?
I'm getting the feeling the problem migh
Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 16:41 schrieben Sie:
> How about Windows client to Windows client speeds?
>
> I'm getting the feeling the problem might be the speed of the hard
> drives on your clients.
For me and my budget, 8 MB/s must be enough.
But here are the requested values:
Copying initia
Hi, Felipe.
Thanks a lot for replying.
Are you from Brazil? I ask because of the domain "paranacidade.org". I´m
from Brazil.
Well, I´m not a expert on Samba or anything, so I really can´t tell if its a
problem or not.
Actually, Volker Lendecke was kind enough to tip me a workaround this issue,
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel wrote:
>> I use FC5.
>> I discovered, for an exemple, if you have a user group with 3 members
>> (Alan, Baker, Clive), before 3.0.23c this line at smb.conf worked fine:
>>
>> valid users = @user
>>
>> But with 3.0.23c update it doesn't work anymore.
>>
>> You have
How about Windows client to Windows client speeds?
I'm getting the feeling the problem might be the speed of the hard
drives on your clients.
Sebastian Held wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 14:56 schrieb Peter Daum:
maybe some people would be adventurous enough to just try it ou
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 14:56 schrieb Peter Daum:
> maybe some people would be adventurous enough to just try it out:
My results (only 1 measurement taken)
WinXP64 -> Samba-3.0.23b/SuSE-Linux-9.2:2:08 min => 8192 kiB/s (smbd
@18% CPU)
other direction: 2:21 min => 7437 kiB/s (smb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/2006 02:44 PM, Scott Mecham escreveu:
> #net groupmap list
> Domain Users (S-1-5-21-1294588444-3772336984-2656111346-513) -> users
> Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-1294588444-3772336984-2656111346-514) -> nobody
> Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-1294588444
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/2006 06:05 PM, Kristoffer Egefelt escreveu:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> Thanks alot for your help.
You are welcome. ;)
> I finally got it to work... :)
>
> I'm afraid I can't get closer to a explanation than this:
>
> Reboot mssql server...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/02/2006 07:50 PM, Steve Glasser escreveu:
> Hi group,
>
> I can't seem to get passwd change from windows to work. I am running
> samba 3.0.20-3.1.20060mdk installed from rpms on Mandriva 2006; the
> clients are windows XP sp2. When I try to ch
You can easily redirect the typical data store for user documents (i.e.
My Documents) to any network share you want. That isn't difficult.
Additionally, you can configure just about any mail client on the planet
(Outlook included) to put the data store there. No big deal. There are
several prob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/02/2006 08:40 PM, Norman S. Clerman escreveu:
> Samba friends,
>
> I have a computer running SUSE Linux 10.1. At work all the computers on
> the network, except this one, are running either Windows 2000 Pro or
> Windows 2000 Server. The co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/30/2006 03:34 PM, Luis Felipe Marzagao/RBSM escreveu:
> Hi there,
Hey!
> I use FC5.
> I discovered, for an exemple, if you have a user group with 3 members (Alan,
> Baker, Clive), before 3.0.23c this line at smb.conf worked fine:
>
>
maybe some people would be adventurous enough to just try it out:
- Create a 1Gb file on a Samba server
(dd if=/dev/zero of=1gm.tmp bs=1024k count=1024)
- Use a windows client to copy the file to a local disk and measure
the time it takes to transfer the data
- copy the file back to a share on
Hello
I am running SAMBA in ADS mode as client and got following question. Is it
possible to enforce somehow mapping to guest if account is locked?
I get following entries in samba log file:
domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user testuser in domain
DOM to Domain controlle
Hi,
last Saturday we reinstalled our fileserver to setup redundancy using
DRBD and Heartbeat. We also upgraded Samba to 3.0.23c, which is acting
as a PDC. We are using OpenLDAP to store accounts.
I populated the OpenLDAP database using a LDIF file that I created on
the old server before s
30 matches
Mail list logo
