I get the following errors when I try to remove group from a user with
usrmgr
smb_create_group: Running the command `/usr/local/sbin/smbldap-groupadd
-p 'test'' gave 111
[2006/10/20 19:53:29, 0] groupdb/mapping.c:smb_delete_user_group(1087)
smb_delete_user_group: Running the command
`/usr/local/
Hi.
So I'm now on the next section of my samba by example book. For the
life of me I just couldn't get it to work. That is until I looked into
what the %S and %U variables actually meant. In the book it says to put
something like the following in your smb.conf:
[files]
comment = Work area
>
> Is anyone aware of this problem and if so has it been corrected in the
> 3.0 series?
>
My interfaces option has a /23 and works with 3.0.14a and 3.0.23c, so I
would guess it has been fixed.
James ZuelowCBJ MIS (907)586-0236
Network Specialist...Registered Linux User No.
First off, I apologize for reporting a problem with a "historical"
version of Samba, but this is what we use in our production environment
due to some integration issues with the 3.0 series.
I've been experiencing a problem with Samba 2.2.x when trying to use a
CIDR notation for hosts allow/den
Hi
How does Windows interpret the 'x' attribute for the file's 'other' attribute
field?
If I give a *file* a 0775 permission Windows XP clients cannot see the file.
Not even the group members.
If I change this permission to 0774 the file becomes visible to everyone.
(smbclient sees the file ei
Hi,
I'm using samba 3.0.23c, and having a bit of trouble getting it to play nice
with my active directory. I'm using Windows Small Business Server 2003 with
the SFU 3.5 NIS server/schema extensions installed. I have samba configured
to use ad as the idmap backend, and sfu for nss info.
When
Checked this. My user has full permissions by being in the administrator
group. Tried also to add the user separately and grant full permissions.
Did not change the situation.
(Please notice that I changed email account)
-Sami
--- sato x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what about the security o
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 11:51:57AM -0500, Larry McElderry wrote:
> Trying to upgrade from 3.0.14a to 3.0.23c. So far, things
> seem to be working, but the following entries appear in
> the smbd error log. The test machine is a domain client
> (server is still 3.0.14). The sids listed are exactly
You'll need only 139/TCP, 445/TCP, 137/UDP and 138/UDP.
The smb ports could be changed using the smb ports param in your smb.conf.
I think if you set smb ports to 445 the only port needs be opened in
your firewall will be the 445/TCP.
On 10/19/06, Torsten Geile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I
Hello,
I'm using Samba 3.0.14a-3 on Debian 3.1 (Sarge). It's functioning as a
domain controller for a lot of WinXP SP2 machines. As such, it serves up
roaming profiles for most of our staff. I've noticed that all of the
folders in the root of the profile are pulled over as read-only. The
UNIX
A few computers -- two or three -- are very spotty about letting
people log on. It seems -- and this could be off-base -- that they'll
let anyone log on once, but will require a reboot before you can log
on again. Sometimes, logging on works fine, though. There really
appears to be little rhyme
2006/10/20, Veronica Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Samba and windows xp has them switched on by default. IIRC you need to
set a blank config directive for profiles so as not to use them:
logon path =
Try that to switch them off.
or you could could create the profile path anyway..
I didn't kn
On 20 Oct 2006, at 22:04, Boniforti Flavio wrote:
Hello list.
Hello
I will really appreciate help on this issue.
BTW: I'm not wanting "Roaming Profiles", I will try them after I can
logon to the PDC with local client profiles at first.
Samba and windows xp has them switched on by def
Hello list.
I just installed and configured my first Samba-3 PDC and I succeeded
immediately with the "join" operation with a Win2k SP4 client.
As I afterwards rebooted and tried to logon with the domain user, both
root and regular user, I got an error messagge telling me that it was
unable to cr
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 03:56:06PM +0800, Zhou,Alan wrote:
> Hi
> ??I installed Samba 3.0.23c on the freebsd 6.1 via ports, I have
> configure krb5.conf and nsswitch.conf, when I execute ???kinit [EMAIL
> PROTECTED] system response ???kinit: NOTICE: ticket renewable lifetime is 10
> hours???
Hello,
I'm looking for a way to make global authentication with samba (both
Unix & Windows). The issue that I'm having with is adding machine into
the domain from the remote locations. I'm using slave ldap on all
remote locations and set smbldap-tools point to slave local server &
remote ma
Hello,
I would like someone to confirm my understanding of winbind use in a
samba domain member server .
First, I think (correct me if I am wrong) that winbind create
dynamically association between unix id and windows sid.
The domain we use is a samba, openldap domain and the samba server
Hi, I am trying to make my winXP clients to access files directly on the
server (to improve speed, because some profiles are up to 5Gb); I have
followed the instructions at:
http://isg.ee.ethz.ch/tools/realmen/det/skel.en.html
to link desktop, program configuration, etc to the server.
First
Hi
I installed Samba 3.0.23c on the freebsd 6.1 via ports, I have configure
krb5.conf and nsswitch.conf, when I execute “kinit [EMAIL PROTECTED] system
response “kinit: NOTICE: ticket renewable lifetime is 10 hours”
But when I execute “net ads join –U [EMAIL PROTECTED] system response
Hi,
Try this patch, it work fine on my server
--> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2135&action=view)
Should apply cleanly to 3.0.23c.
It's my bug report : https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4097
---
Stéphane PURNELLE [
20 matches
Mail list logo
