> My setup involves sharing filesystem "/a" and then mounting it on
> "/b". I can > use "ls -l" on the "/b" filesystem in a
> case-insensitive fashion but when I go to open the file by a
> case-insensitive name the attempt fails.
>
> Can someone please explain why I am not able to open() files wi
wbinfo -u prints out all my users
wbinfo -g prints out all my groups
getent group prints out all my groups and their unix IDs
getent -r username seems to get the correct user group unix ids for all
the users, even the ones that don't see to be able to have their SID
converted to a UID.
I
Hello,
We have a RedHat3 server, with some NFS mounts to Solaris9 servers.
That works nicely. We also run samba on top of that, for Windows
access to the NFS shares. Works fine.
However, on a RedHat4 system, using the exact same mount, we
experience odd behavior. I can access the shares throu
ethereal or the command line utility tcpdump. If you are not familiar with
ethereal, simply capture the packets with tcpdump.
Thank you David. I think I have everything up there except the tcpdump
information. I'll post that shortly.
P.S.-what is your PE in?
Forest Engineering, you?
Gre
>From: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > First, can you try 3.0.23c? If that does not work either,
> > can you please file a bug report at
>
> As requested; I tested using the 3.0.23 with no luck. I've raised a bug
> in the tracker: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4188
>
Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote:
First, can you try 3.0.23c? If that does not work either,
can you please file a bug report at
As requested; I tested using the 3.0.23 with no luck. I've raised a
bug in the tracker: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4188
I don't know how to run a trace
First, can you try 3.0.23c? If that does not work either,
can you please file a bug report at
As requested; I tested using the 3.0.23 with no luck. I've raised a bug
in the tracker: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4188
I don't know how to run a trace. If you could spell it out f
I've recently connected a 64-bit windows box to my existing Samba-run
domain. In order to do this, I upgraded to Samba 3.0.23c. Most things
work fine. However, I'm having trouble getting the 64-bit box to
properly pick up the location of the roaming profile. I want the
profile to be stored
I have a separate drive, mapped to /mnt/mydrive
I have a samba share, set up to share this entire drive out as
\\mysystem\bigdrive
Now, I can do a df -h to get the free/used information on the drive, but
this information is not appearing when I click on properties of the
mapped drive on my WinXP
Greetings...
I'm struggling trying to set up a samba 3.0.23c PDC with ldap
backend. The server is Fedora 5, OpenLdap version 2.3.19-4.
I've got it so smbd and nmbd start properly and I can use a windows
box and see the domain using srvmgr.exe and usrmgr.exe. I'm then
able to signon from a w
I cranked up the debug level of winbindd, so I have a bit more info on this.
Should I file a bug on this? I'm pretty sure I'm not doing anything wrong.
Here's the winbindd log from running wbinfo -S SID with the debug level set
to 10.
[2006/10/24 11:37:14, 6] nsswitch/winbindd.c:new_connectio
I'm reposting the following message since it received no replies the
first time.
Maybe this is the wrong list for this question?
Begin forwarded message:
Date: October 17, 2006 11:10:31 AM PDT
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Permissions and CIFS
I recently discovered the 2GB file
On 24/10/06, Steven Thomas Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm a newbie having the same problems as reported at
http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg78809.html.
I'm writing to ask if these bug fixes have been implemented yet, and how
to download if they have!
The changes
Hello all,
I have a quick question. the backup software, EXEC 10, does not change the
archive bits on Samba share. so when we ran our Full back up it was fine and
it was suppose to change the archive bits then when we ran our *incremental
back it ran a full back because the archive bits didn't ch
Hi.
What kind of problems?
I'm using it with ldap and works fine for me, most of the isues I had were
related to
misconfiguration, and thanks to those scripts I got rid off of the tedious
procedure
to add the user in the local passwd file , and then use smbpasswd to add a
user or a machine.
now,
Hi,
I am trying to make a Linux filesystem appear case-insensitive and I got the
idea that I could use a SAMBA loopback mount to do this. I almost succeeded on
my first try but I ran into a snag I have no answer for yet.
My setup involves sharing filesystem "/a" and then mounting it on "/b". I
> Hi There,
>
> i'm keep having problems with samba and smbldap-tools for adding
> machine accounts on the fly. So I'm somewhat sick of smbldap-tools and
> i wanted to know if someone is aware of an alternative to it. I
> haven't found one yet. Anyone? (except writing it myself what would be
>
All,
Has anybody any experience with setting up a samba server on unix
knowing that :
- authentication will have to be done by an NT server and
See about password server
- once authenticated the user data (like home dir ) has to come from an
ldap server ( the unix server is an ldap client an
Hi
Thought I'd let you know I fixed it. it WAS something stupid after
all... turns out I didn't compile samba with experimental modules. I
must have missed the bit that tells me it's required first time
round. I've got the pw command working and I can assign domain users
to the file sy
Hello,
we've been more than happy with Samba 3.0.22 on our Solaris 9 machines,
but when we upgraded to Solaris 10 users are experiencing a multitude
of XP desktop problems: icons disappear, start menu will hang because a
few items link back to a samba share, many XP windows write delay
problems,
Hi There,
i'm keep having problems with samba and smbldap-tools for adding machine
accounts on the fly. So I'm somewhat sick of smbldap-tools and i wanted
to know if someone is aware of an alternative to it. I haven't found one
yet. Anyone? (except writing it myself what would be the very last
Hi List,
I have upgraded (yesterday) from 3.0.14a to 3.0.23c. Now i see these
strang entries in the log files and also a mjor increase in
authentication time (i.e. smbclient -L //server -U now takes about
22 seconds to complete !! with version 3.0.14a its instant!)
[2006/10/24 11:21:26, 2]
On 10/17/06, Stefan Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Frederik,
I thik its the winbind separator parameter in smb.conf.
Did you define it as backslash in smb.conf so the samba server
interprets this as linefeed like this:
ERROR: the 'winbind separator' parameter must be a single character.
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 12:55:33PM -0700, Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote:
> Can anyone share any insight as to why Vista RC2 can't delete
> directories on a Samba 3.0.10 share? No problem delete directories
> using a windows XP client.
Please test against 3.0.23c so we know if this is a bug
we've
Hello,
since I found various bits of information but no howto or similar, I'd
like to ask how you would handle the following scenario:
- two domains with identical name on two physically totally separated
networks, but with different IP-Subents (both in the private range
172.16.x). One domain has
Hi there!
To set up a samba PDC with openLDAP on my openSUSE 10.1 x86_64 I followed
this howto: http://en.opensuse.org/Howto_setup_SUSE_10.1_as_Samba_PDC
Every service seems to be running now but now I'm stuck. I was able to join
a clean Windows XP Pro test machine to my Domain and I'm able to lo
26 matches
Mail list logo
