On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 05:36:40PM -0800, Mark Nienberg wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Do they know about it?
Sure.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208718
Volker
pgpEfsMZJxgJn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read
PS - If you find my advice helpful, in lieu of lunch, I would accept
entry into Washinton U's doctoral Computer Science & Engineering program
with a nice stipend. ;)
Sorry - just noticed your e-mail address and since I'm interested in
grad studies, I couldn't resist. :)
Good luck with Samba/
hi scott
Sorry i could not get you. I am trying to join the samba pdc to the same
domain to which samba is configured.
ok i have also tried to configure another linux system as BDC with Fedora
directory server (replication from master ldap server ie Fedora Directory
server). i get the same error
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 11:07:37AM -0800, Mark Nienberg wrote:
I'm not sure what package I updated that changed this from working to
crashing, but this seems like a little samba bug to me.
No, it's a Fedora (5 and 6) bug.
Volker
Thanks for the info. Do they know abou
To answer my own question.
Howard Chu, on the fedora-directory-users list, answered a slightly
different version of the same query from me and I think has put me out
of my misery :)
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-directory-users/2006-December/msg00165.html
Now, my University has
Thomas Bork web.de> writes:
> I just installed NT 4.0 SP6 in VMWARE and tried accessing 3.0.23d with
> this patch - successfully.
>
> And with this patch I can also join the samba 3.0.23d domain. Sorry -
> don't know, what your problem is.
>
> der tom
Maybe that is the difference between SP
Michael, All,
I have been going back through the Samba archives looking to see if a
Samba+LDAP+Kerberos configuration is possible given my situation.
Mostly I see posts that say "You can't get there from here.", but I
don't want to give up too easily. My situation is this:
I have a new Sa
On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 09:39:42AM +0100, Robert Gehr wrote:
> Hi there
>
> After having posted a while ago about the trouble I had with 3.0.23 I
> gave it another try with 3.0.23d
>
> I installed the current version on our samba PDC and BDC while the
> member server was still running 3.0.22. T
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Froehlich
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 9:43 AM
>
> Hello,
>
> I have two samba servers, A is configured as a PDC, B offers some
> additional shares. B is getting usernames and passwords via winbind
> from a, using the following configuration dire
Hello,
I have two samba servers, A is configured as a PDC, B offers some
additional shares. B is getting usernames and passwords via winbind
from a, using the following configuration directives:
| idmap uid = 100-999
| idmap gid = 100-999
| winbind enum users = yes
| winbind enum groups = yes
| w
Okay,
I have been a lurker for some time, so it is time to show my ignorance.
I thought that you could only have one (1) PDC in a Windows Domain. If
you are trying to join a Samba PDC to a domain that implies that the
other domain has a PDC already. Of course I could be full of it also.
mallapadi
Hi Guido,
Know what Im missing:
1) check that the new password is not similar to the old one.
The pam_cracklib man pages show exactly what are you found:
By default, pam_cracklib performs a number of basic checks on the new password:
Simple Checks (http://www.deer-run.com/~hal/sysadmin/pam_cra
Frank Murphy wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"smbclient -L Server" lists, all my shares
http://www.howtoforge.com/accessing_windows_or_samba_shares_using_autofs
got me to automount my shares.
But I still can't save directly (files) from Firefox (on openSUSE)
directly to
Hi there
After having posted a while ago about the trouble I had with 3.0.23 I
gave it another try with 3.0.23d
I installed the current version on our samba PDC and BDC while the
member server was still running 3.0.22. This setup has worked for a
couple of weeks with no issues.
I then upgr
Hi,
I have samba-3.0.23d-1tr on a trustix 3.0 system.
This samba was joined to a win 2k3 domain and it works perfect for lot of
months.
Now I can access only to tmp share, and samba server is sometimes slow to
expose all shares.
If I launch wbinfo u or wbinfo g, I still see the users/group from
15 matches
Mail list logo
