Here's my samba version in FC6:
samba-common-3.0.23c-2
samba-3.0.23c-2
samba-client-3.0.23c-2
- Original Message -
From: "Salman Moghal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2007 2:45 AM
Subject: Samba running slow
Hello everyone:
Over the past few years I have bee
Hello everyone:
Over the past few years I have been a happy samba user, running samba on
Redhat / FC platforms. Recently I upgraded hardware, and Samba hasn't been
performing well at all.. which makes me sad :-(
The new hardware is Asus P5B board with a dual-core intel processor. This
boar
What I did at my site was to share out a directory filled with
symlinks. These symlinks link to various actual directories on
different filesystems.
I do this on my network and it works very well.
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https:/
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:37:14 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
>Can the path statement in the smb.conf contain two entries as in the example
>below:
>
>path = /u04/abcdef /u03/xyz
>
>What I want to do is to essentially have 2 filesystems be part of one share
>so that the windows users would see all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Latrell Wang 王獻綱 wrote:
> I looked into the source code, and have some observations:
> 1.
> I don't wrote the realm in my smb.conf, because I get
> the realm form net ads info.
> Once I set realm in the smb.conf, net ads info worked
For any 'net ads'
Hi.
I am trying to configure Samba in Domain security mode. I am getting an error
message when running "net rpc join" (see below).
My Active Directory and Samba Sever are in different subnets. Do I required
anything else in the smb.conf to address it? I tried adding the wins server
option but i
Hi.
I am trying to configure Samba with "Security = Domain". Does the AD must be
configured to allow NT emulation?
More details below:
Tks.
Ana
Active Directory: Win 2003 Server + SP2
Domain: FAFIDDOM
Samba Server:Sun Solaris 9
Samba #:3.0.23
# Global p
> Charles Marcus wrote:
> >> RAID: 0+1 (mirrored stripe sets)
> >
> > RAID 1+0 is much better - much less likely to fail, and rebuilds much
> > faster:
> >
> > http://aput.net/~jheiss/raid10/
> >
>
Thank you! I was not aware of that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
RAID 10 is very good, but does have the downside of requiring quite a
few disks to achieve large amounts of storage.
Scott Lockwood wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
RAID: 0+1 (mirrored stripe sets)
RAID 1+0 is much better - much less likely to fail, and rebuilds much
faster:
http:
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
> You can do that with DFS (i think its correct name, review Samba how to).
> DFS
> let you to have share distributed.
>
> Le vendredi 26 janvier 2007 14:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>> Can the path statement in the smb.conf contain two entries as in the
>> e
That's what I meant the first time. Thanks for correcting me.
Charles Marcus wrote:
RAID: 0+1 (mirrored stripe sets)
RAID 1+0 is much better - much less likely to fail, and rebuilds much
faster:
http://aput.net/~jheiss/raid10/
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
On Thursday 25 January 2007, Ana Giordano wrote:
> security = domain
Isn't "security = ADS" proper for AD type domains?
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
RAID: 0+1 (mirrored stripe sets)
RAID 1+0 is much better - much less likely to fail, and rebuilds much
faster:
http://aput.net/~jheiss/raid10/
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listi
You can do that with DFS (i think its correct name, review Samba how to). DFS
let you to have share distributed.
Le vendredi 26 janvier 2007 14:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Can the path statement in the smb.conf contain two entries as in the
> example below:
>
> path = /u04/abcdef /u03/xy
Charles.
That is all that I have in my smb.conf file.
A new info is that if I try:
nslookup , the hostname and IP are correctly returned
nmblookup -S , I get the error message "name_query failed to find name
FAIDHC01SDCG0402
Thanks for your reply.
Ana
- Original Message
From: Charle
Can the path statement in the smb.conf contain two entries as in the example
below:
path = /u04/abcdef /u03/xyz
What I want to do is to essentially have 2 filesystems be part of one share
so that the windows users would see all the sub-directories of filesystems
/u04/abcdef and /u03/xyz
Chris Hall wrote:
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 you wrote
*snip*
I had a configuration that worked pre .23 but now suddenly did not work.
What I needed to know was that with .23 it is ESSENTIAL that groupmap
settings are made for a small number of groups.
Even better, it would have been good to know
Hi Dale,
i'm using cups 1.2.7-2.
thanks
Marcos.
--- Dale Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escreveu:
> Are you using CUPS? If yes, which version? There
> was such an error in
> CUPS 1.2.3 or 1.2.4 - I forget which one.
>
> Dale
>
> x wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > i have a debian etch with
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/24/2007 07:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
>> i have recently switched to ldap backend for passwords
>> smbldap-useradd,smbldap-passwd works without error messages...
>> but when i try to connect from linux it gives me the following err
Hi,
For a machine connected over the internet to pass through a firewall and
print using samba what ports do I need open? I am using CUPS and SAMBA so
do I need to open up the ports to connect to CUPS as well as SAMBA?
Basically is the situation when printing with samba at the point of
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/24/2007 07:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
>> i have recently switched to ldap backend for passwords
>> smbldap-useradd,smbldap-passwd works without error messages...
>> but when i try to connect from linux it gives me the following err
I've been running the same configuration for a couple of years now,
and since I've upgraded to Office 2007, MS Word and MS Excel files
save to my samba shares as -r even when they are opened as
being chmod 777. Files I create/edit using other editors or windows
explorer are put onto the sha
Do you mean a review to detail the best performance? This is complicated
question since budget clearly plays a role. But I'll give you what I
think are the highest performance options without considering costs (and
not including a RAM storage array).
RAID: 0+1 (mirrored stripe sets)
Drive Type
Hi,
We have a linux/samba only domain serving files to about 16-18 Windows
clients (mostly XP, a few W2K).
PDC:
SuSE OpenXchange 4.4
samba 2.2.8a
openldap 2.1.4
Domain Member Server
Fedora Core 1
samba 3.0.10
Currently the Domain Member Server uses the default passdb backend
(/etc/samba/smb
Has anyone posted an up to date hardware review lately?
It seems clear that a RAID6 server with 300GB CHEETAH 15K.5 SAS drives will
trump a P3 with a 30GB IDE drive, however, not everyone will spend the money
required for the high end unit, I'm looking to build a new server & trying
to make best
On 1/24/07, Chris Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I run Samba as a PDC for a small network. I used to use smbpassword and
went through the pain of changing up to tdbsam.
I have just upgraded from v3.0.14a to v3.0.23a.
I have just (today!) done nearly exactly this same thing. I went from
the
Hi!
I did a new vampire on the NT4 and gott the accounts, I get an error saying
"Could not find unix group 513" even though I have that group after running
smbldap-populate prior to vampire. This does'nt seem to effect the creation
of machine account because the machine account are there when I do
Hello,
we use samba with openLDAP. The machines are also registered into samba
using the smbldap-useradd script.
Now we need also the MAC address of the PC in the samba machine account
entry.
We know that it should be possible to do this passing to smbldap-useradd the
samba parameter %I and th
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 11:39:03AM -0500, Marc Delisle wrote:
> >>>Jan 23 09:46:34 localhost smbd[5672]: make_connection: connection
> >>>to IPC$ denied due to security descriptor.
> >
> >I see a lot of those messages too. I don't have any problems connecting
> >to the share(s) though.
> >
> >>
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 10:33 +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 02:47:36PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > Samba4 has a demonstration of parallel sid2name and name2sid operations
> > in the RPC-LSA torture test. However, parallel authentication isn't
> > possible, due to limi
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 02:47:36PM +1100, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> Samba4 has a demonstration of parallel sid2name and name2sid operations
> in the RPC-LSA torture test. However, parallel authentication isn't
> possible, due to limitations on the windows server side (it dumps the
> connection...).
Ralf Gross schrieb:
> I want to switch from 'security = server' to 'security = ADS'.
> Kerberos is working and I can login to the server.
>
> With Samba 3.0.22 I was able to restrict access to shares with the
> 'valid users' directive. ve is local unix group.
>
> [foo]
> comment = foo
>
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 09:58 +0100, Collen Blijenberg wrote:
> Hmm, my new server is installed as BDC!,
>
> but using RPC VAMPIRE against a samba PDC or Domain, ain't working...
>
> guess it's going to be import/export then, that's all there is left
Correct, you cannot vampire a Samba domain
Hmm, my new server is installed as BDC!,
but using RPC VAMPIRE against a samba PDC or Domain, ain't working...
guess it's going to be import/export then, that's all there is left
Cheers, Collen
Mark Rutherford wrote:
Hmmm, you can use that, but:
RPC VAMPIRE
Export users, aliases
I looked into the source code, and have some observations:
1.
I don't wrote the realm in my smb.conf, because I get the realm form net ads
info.
Once I set realm in the smb.conf, net ads info worked.
Does it mean the realm is needed in smb.conf?
In libads\Ldap.c, the ads_try connect() do not have
35 matches
Mail list logo
