Re: [Samba] Option valid user not expanded for groups

2007-04-29 Thread Tiucra-Popa Florin Catalin
Hi Cleber, I joined an old version of SAMBA Version 3.0.20b(1 year ago) and it was no need to create/recreate mappings. Unfortunately the winbind_idmap.tdb for that machine is for another Domain Controller and I cannot populate the TPDCBR. Take a look at the old samba machine idmap: [EMAIL PROT

Re: [Samba] Re: major cifs bug in 2.6.19+?

2007-04-29 Thread Jason Haar
Akemi Yagi wrote: > I have been using CentOS 4, CentOS 5 (with bug-fixed cifs.ko) as well as > FC4, 5, and 6 to mount Windows shares, but have never seen the behavior > you are experiencing. I do use rsync to backup Windows files and it's > been working. What do you see with: > > cat /proc/fs/cif

[Samba] Yearly attempt at 'vampire' of NT4 domain

2007-04-29 Thread Daniel Kasak
Hi all. Since our NT4 PDC is on it's last legs, I've been motivated to once again try to use samba's vampire functionality. Unfortunately I'm actually doing worse than last year ... My smb.conf: [global] socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 interfaces = 10

Re: [Samba] Option valid user not expanded for groups

2007-04-29 Thread Cleber P. de Souza
You do need to create the ldap group for samba using the built-in SIDs for these internal groups or creating a new one for others and set the group mappings. On 4/29/07, Tiucra-Popa Florin Catalin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi again, Command net groupam shows: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /samba/var/log

[Samba] Samba/LDAP PDC and member servers

2007-04-29 Thread Julian Pilfold-Bagwell
Hi All, I have a problem with permissions following a migration from tdbsam to LDAP. As I understand it from the documentation, each member server on the domain needs to have 2 SIDs, a domain SID and a local machine SID. After migrating the server to ldap, users can still login and desktops an

[Samba] kernel: smb_proc_readdir_long: error=-2, breaking

2007-04-29 Thread Kevin Bailey
Hi, Found this in the kernel.log psctpdc:/var/log/samba# tail /var/log/kern.log Apr 29 08:18:05 psctpdc kernel: smb_proc_readdir_long: error=-2, breaking The server may have been doing some copying/backups at the time. Is it anything which needs action? Thanks, Kevin -- To unsubscribe from t

[Samba] Can copy to test share, but not read, move or delete

2007-04-29 Thread Dan Roberts
I have a new SentOS 5 system and have been having problems with Samba. I had been able to access my test share but not my home share. Attempting to re-set thigns as describe by the "webmin configure samba" info resluted in being able to see everything but the home shares. I don't know if I c

Re: [Samba] Option valid user not expanded for groups

2007-04-29 Thread Tiucra-Popa Florin Catalin
Hi again, Command net groupam shows: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /samba/var/log #/samba/bin/net groupmap list Administrators (S-1-5-32-544) -> BUILTIN+administrators Users (S-1-5-32-545) -> BUILTIN+users The browsing is working ok for users, but is not workig for groups. FlorinT - Original Message

Re: [Samba] Device WinDfs error

2007-04-29 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 07:59:00PM +0100, Kevin Bailey wrote: > \Device\WinDfs\H:00186bf9\psctpdc\bpeters\thunderbird\ImapMail\10.1.1.10\INBOX.msf > The data has been lost. > This error may be caused by a failure of your computer hardware or > network connection. > > [2007/04/23 14:38:26,

[Samba] Device WinDfs error

2007-04-29 Thread Kevin Bailey
Hi, Have recently upgraded from Samba 2.2 on Debian Woody to Samba 3.0.24-6 on Debian Etch. Some PC's have now reported errors similar to this one. Windows - delay write failed. Windows was unable to save all the data for the file \Device\WinDfs\H:00186bf9\psctpdc\bpeters\thunderbird\

[Samba] Problem using valid users with security = ADS

2007-04-29 Thread Henrik Zagerholm
Hi list, I have a weird problem. Im using samba 3.0.24 in ADS mode against a 2003 server. If I put admin users = @"KIC\Domain Users" I can connect with all users in that group. If I remove admin users and instead use valid users = @"KIC\Domain Users" I receive the following error Domain=[

RE: [Samba] Guide to porting to non-unix like systems?

2007-04-29 Thread Carlos Rivera-Jones
I wonder, however, why port a networking system so completely tied-in to POSIX, like SMB, to a non-POSIX OS? What is the need? "The experience (particularly with Samba3) has been that it is easier to add a POSIX layer to the OS than to keep 'fixing' samba." Yes. That also has the added advantag

[Samba] UID, GID access query

2007-04-29 Thread JM Fraser
Is it possible that I can setup Samba to allow access to certain directories dependent on the UID or GID? I may have various directories owned by someone else but will still need to be accessed by the logged in Samba member. Is this possible? Jules -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the fol

Re: [Samba] Guide to porting to non-unix like systems?

2007-04-29 Thread Andreas Fredriksson
On 4/28/07, Andrew Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Samba4 is less tied to this than Samba3, but doing without anything like POSIX will be hard. I think my best shot then is to make an experimental hack on top of Samba4 and go from there with perhaps adding a small POSIX emulation layer on