Bjørn Tore Sund schrieb:
Jan wrote:
Hey Bjørn,
Hey Jan,
If you bottom-quote and edit when you respond to me, it becomes that
much easier to reply _in_ your email and address specifics there.
Alright! The next time, i will do so :)
the traffic isn't send by a different subnet ...
eth1 =
Helmut Hullen schrieb:
Hallo, Jan,
Du (jan) meintest am 04.08.07:
the traffic isn't send by a different subnet ...
eth1 = 192.168.0.100 ( default route via 192.168.0.150 )
eth2 = 192.168.0.200
both interfaces belonging to the same net (255.255.255.0) ...
Hallo, Jan,
Du (jan) meintest am 04.08.07:
> the traffic isn't send by a different subnet ...
> eth1 = 192.168.0.100 ( default route via 192.168.0.150 )
> eth2 = 192.168.0.200
> both interfaces belonging to the same net (255.255.255.0) ...
That's no good configuration - try to work with one c
Jan wrote:
Hey Bjørn,
Hey Jan,
If you bottom-quote and edit when you respond to me, it becomes that
much easier to reply _in_ your email and address specifics there.
the traffic isn't send by a different subnet ...
eth1 = 192.168.0.100 ( default route via 192.168.0.150 )
eth2 = 192.168.0.2
On 8/4/07, Jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not this stupid okay? :) - the syntax and interface are formated
> correctly.
Sorry, I not intended this.
Have you checked how clients are resolving netbios names?
As both interface are in the same networks, maybe due to same names
set in /etc/hosts
C.Scheeder skrev:
Hi,
if i recall it correct, there was someone a few month?/years? ago
(don't know how long exactly),
having a similar problem with a rebooting client on logon.
I think it turned out to be a problem of the windows-machine, some
very crude combination
of bugs.
Search the maili
Hey Bjørn,
the traffic isn't send by a different subnet ...
eth1 = 192.168.0.100 ( default route via 192.168.0.150 )
eth2 = 192.168.0.200
both interfaces belonging to the same net (255.255.255.0) ...
eth2 is not configurated with an default route. could this be the failure?
(i don't think so
I'm not this stupid okay? :) - the syntax and interface are formated
correctly.
the netbios broadcasts are send by the specified interface but however a
data transfer
starts the complete traffic goes over the eth1 device. It's really
strange isn't it?
Would someone please check if it's the sam
Jan wrote:
Jan schrieb:
Hello,
tonight my home samba server attracted my attention because i had
seen that the complete
traffic (copy user->server / server->user) goes via eth0 and not how
specified in smb.con
via the eth2 interface.
i tried to bind it like this:
*interfaces = lo eth2
This is correct: http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/server_security.html
Maybe you have forgotten restart the service.
On 8/4/07, Jan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes - but the same error as before ...
> Anyone else have another idea?
>
> best regards
> Jan
>
>
> cuicui schrieb:
> > Jan a écrit :
> >
Yes - but the same error as before ...
Anyone else have another idea?
best regards
Jan
cuicui schrieb:
Jan a écrit :
Hello,
tonight my home samba server attracted my attention because i had
seen that the complete
traffic (copy user->server / server->user) goes via eth0 and not how
specifi
Set a wins server on this network if there isn't one yet. For this on
samba set 'wins support = Yes'
Also set the wins server on the client, maybe with dhcp using
'netbios-name-servers' option of ISC DHCPD or manually.
On 8/3/07, Joakim Lagerqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I belie
On Saturday 04 August 2007 18:19:13 joop gerritse wrote:
[...]
> > Do you have a windows domain controller?
[...]
> yes.
I think I misread that question. No, it's not a Windows machine. It is a Linux
server, and it runs Samba. And I think it has been set up by someone who just
used trial and err
On Saturday 04 August 2007 11:27:27 John Drescher wrote:
[...]
> You are not using AD, LDAP or winbindd but you are using the tdbsam with
> mapped users security method. You are not using a wins server and the samba
> server will not be the master browser (this may be a problem).
Right. I think I
Am using ldap samba
If I try to rename a workstation, it asks for username and password. I'm
logged in as root, I get access denied after I enter the name and
password. Is there a way to fix this?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by RCRnet, and
is belie
Bill Baker wrote:
If anyone can provide any help or insight into this, I'd really
appreciate it. Google searches have proved fruitless and I've found out
nothing useful by running smbclient and nmblookup commands.
Fedora 7 separated the init scripts for the smb and nmb processes, so
you'll wa
>
> Here is my current smb.conf . I didn't want to send it immediately (in
> some
> groups that is not done)
I understand. If you posted your whole kernel .config to a group for a
hardware question I would have been a little upset. But smb.conf files are
generally not that big.
and I have omitt
Hello, *
Here is my current smb.conf . I didn't want to send it immediately (in some
groups that is not done) and I have omitted some dozens of shares at the end,
which are similar to the ones present.
[global]
workgroup = LIEMERS-MUSEUM
netbios name = HPserver
server
Hi all,
I am trying to develop VFS module for samba to work with interface version
(>=6).
I am just wondering after which samba version SMB_VFS_INTERFACE_VERSION
becomes >=6, so that I can put the dependency for my module for minimal
samba version to be installed.
Is there anybosy who can help me?
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 22:29 +0200, Marcello De Geronimo wrote:
> Hi,
> i'm looking for this how-to, often referenced but no more available:
>
> https://sec.miljovern.no/bin/view/Info/HeimdalKerberosSambaAndOpenLdap
>
> Is there anywhere an how-to about integrating Heimdal, Kerberos, Samba
> and
20 matches
Mail list logo
