Michael Lueck wrote:
>
> Atrox wrote:
>> Hmm, actually the machine runs OpenVPN too, so its (bridged) tap device
>> has
>> its own IP that falls into the same netmask /24. Is it possible that
>> Samba
>> may get confused about that? Should specifying only the internal
>> interface
>> (and lo0 ma
make sure that user logged in to windows box is an owner of files .
as i know , only owner can change permissions .
try # chown "administrator/DOMAIN" /samba/test.txt , after that try
to set permissions on this file from windows .
On 10/18/07, Eric Diven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> None when I
Hello All,
Just thought I'd throw this out. I got Samba & Vista home folders to show
up and work correctly finally running as a member server to Windows 2003
AD domain, after lots of wrangling. This is on an old Samba 3.0.10.
Running FC3. If anyone is having probs with this I can post my smb.conf.
>> Yup. Look at the man page for idmap_ad(8).
Great. I'll take a look.
Are there any plans to make the timeout more forgiving an upcoming
releases? If I jump to the latest stable version, will there be any tdb
fixes that address this issue now?
Thanks,
Bill Pappas - System Integration Engine
"bind failed on port 445 socket_addr = 0.0.0.0.
Error = Address already in use"
I think that you are trying to run smb multiple times.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Ramadevu, Ramkumar escreveu:
> Hello Friends,
>
> Actually here is the history of my operation, initially I am having
> the samba version samba3.0.23_A0 and leter I am trying to upgrade it
> to samba3.0.25_A0 without changing the smb.conf, that results so many
> obsolete entries.
>
> Now I have r
any errors on windows side when you try to set permissions?
On 10/18/07, Volker Lendecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:11:59AM -0400, Eric Diven wrote:
> > Here you go:
> >
> > bash-3.00# /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b | grep ACL
> >HAVE_SYS_ACL_H
> >HAVE_SOLARIS_
Trying to join a 3.0.23c pdc with 3.0.26a gives error:
-
./net rpc join -S TESTPDC -Uroot%passwd
[2007/10/18 19:49:35, 0] utils/net_rpc_join.c:net_rpc_join_newstyle(304)
error setting trust account password: NT co
Hello,
We have two problems with Win2k SP4 clients accessing our Samba file
server:
1. Sometimes the contents of a folder on a Samba share become outdated until the
folder contents are manually refreshed by pressing F5 in Windows Explorer. From
what I have read, this can be caused by missing or
Atrox wrote:
Hmm, actually the machine runs OpenVPN too, so its (bridged) tap device has
its own IP that falls into the same netmask /24. Is it possible that Samba
may get confused about that? Should specifying only the internal interface
(and lo0 maybe) in "interfaces" help in this case?
I hav
Yes, each unit has it's own PDC, but each one need to authenticate all
users from the organization.
I think there is no other way than using all users under the same
container, but I'm not a Samba+LDAP specialist, maybe I let something
out on my readings.
Sorry if this message was replicated, som
Issue: Vista reads slowly from a samba server. This appears to pop up
periodically here and elsewhere.
My samba.conf file has:
[homes]
...
vfs objects = readahead
As suggested elsewhere.
Writes are approximately 17-18MB/s which is acceptable. Reads are in
the 8MB/s range which is appalingl
This might be a need if you have several PDCs (samba domains) running on
one LDAP server. I've had such structure for several years and it works OK.
M.
Fabiano Caixeta Duarte napisał(a):
2007/10/18, Daniel L. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Daniel Cristian Cruz wrote:
I had a LDAP tree w
2007/10/18, Daniel L. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Daniel Cristian Cruz wrote:
> > I had a LDAP tree with this structure:
> >
> > dc=base
> > + ou=unit1
> > + ou=People
> > + ou=Groups
> > + ou=Computers
> > + ou=unit2
> > + ou=People
> > + ou=Groups
> > + ou=Computers
> > + ou=unit3
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:11:59AM -0400, Eric Diven wrote:
> Here you go:
>
> bash-3.00# /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b | grep ACL
>HAVE_SYS_ACL_H
>HAVE_SOLARIS_ACLS
>HAVE__ACL
>HAVE__FACL
>
> It looks plausible to me, but I'm assuming you know better than I what
That indeed loo
Daniel Cristian Cruz wrote:
> I had a LDAP tree with this structure:
>
> dc=base
> + ou=unit1
> + ou=People
> + ou=Groups
> + ou=Computers
> + ou=unit2
> + ou=People
> + ou=Groups
> + ou=Computers
> + ou=unit3
> + ou=People
> + ou=Groups
> + ou=Computers
> ...
>
> And I need peopl
Hello, all.
I was wondering if anyone could help me with this configuration:
I had a LDAP tree with this structure:
dc=base
+ ou=unit1
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
+ ou=unit2
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
+ ou=unit3
+ ou=People
+ ou=Groups
+ ou=Computers
...
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:11:59AM -0400, Eric Diven wrote:
> Here you go:
>
> bash-3.00# /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b | grep ACL
>HAVE_SYS_ACL_H
>HAVE_SOLARIS_ACLS
>HAVE__ACL
>HAVE__FACL
>
> It looks plausible to me, but I'm assuming you know better than I what
That indeed look
Hi,
I am using samba 3.0.24-6etch4 with ldap as a PDC. This ist the home
part in smb.conf
[homes]
comment = Homedrive
path = /home/%U
valid users = %S
read only = No
create mask = 0700
directory mask = 0700
browseable = No
nt acl support = 1
inherit acls = 0
inher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pappas, Bill wrote:
>>> What is SJMEMDC15? The name of your domain? or DC? Sounds like
> you are not running Winbind. If not, then running winbindd should
> reduce contention on access to the secrets.tdb file.
>
> SJMEMDC is a DC. I am not using
Here you go:
bash-3.00# /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd -b | grep ACL
HAVE_SYS_ACL_H
HAVE_SOLARIS_ACLS
HAVE__ACL
HAVE__FACL
It looks plausible to me, but I'm assuming you know better than I what
it should say. Also, I did just check, and that is the binary that the
init script is starting
>> What is SJMEMDC15? The name of your domain? or DC? Sounds like
you are not running Winbind. If not, then running winbindd should
reduce contention on access to the secrets.tdb file.
SJMEMDC is a DC. I am not using winbind. I want AD (via MSSFU) to
establish our UIDs and GIDs so that other
On 10/17/07, Peter Baumgartner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using Samba 3.0.25c on OpenSolaris nv72.
>
> wbinfo -u lists domain users as expected.
> getent passwd only lists local users.
> nsswitch.conf has the following lines:
> passwd: files winbind
> group: files winbind
>
> My
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pappas, Bill wrote:
> tdb_chainlock_with_timeout_internal: alarm (10) timed out for
> key SJMEMDC15 in tdb /usr/local/samba-3.0.23a/private/secrets.tdb
What is SJMEMDC15? The name of your domain? or DC? Sounds like
you are not running Winbind.
From: Dale Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If what I described above does not work for you, perhaps this thread
> applies?
>
> http://archives.devshed.com/forums/samba-120/problems-installing-printer-driver-1365160.html
>
That seems to do the trick, thanks. The driver files were read-only, but
af
Hello Friends,
Actually here is the history of my operation, initially I am having the samba
version samba3.0.23_A0 and leter I am trying to upgrade it to samba3.0.25_A0
without changing the smb.conf, that results so many obsolete entries.
Now I have removed the all the obsolete entries
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:40:36 +0200
"Valerio Daelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> On 10/15/07, Willy Offermans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello Valerio,
> >
> > Maybe ``grep'' can help you?
> >
>
> Thanks for your suggestion.
> We were looking for something like a good patch already
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 06:25:06PM -0400, Eric Diven wrote:
> I added nt acl support = yes to the config file and restarted with no
> effect. The manpage for smb.conf said yes is the default, so I had been
> omitting it, but I suppose it can't hurt. The share is on a UFS volume
> on Solaris, I co
28 matches
Mail list logo
