Re: [Samba] Migration from Ldap to Samba+Ldap

Apologies to the original poster for Rob & I chopping this all up... On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Rob Shinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Charlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> When I converted our networks to samba a decade or more ago, I started >> out by t

[Samba] Problem with mandatory profile

People... I'm trying to configure the samba with a mandatory profile but i'm having problens. When the user makes the login the profile is save in "C:\Documents and Settings" but when he makes log off the your profile dont's removed. This is my configuration "smb.conf" [global] workgroup = PO

Re: [Samba] winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, no idle connection found

Elvar wrote: I meant to respond to this a long time ago and I'm sorry for the delay. Yes, I'm using NTLM to authenticate the users to Active Directory requiring specific group membership. If the users don't belong to group "Internet Access" they are denied out. I can stomach the lack of encr

Re: [Samba] NetBIOS Hostname

Definitely an OpenSUSE issue. That's a really terrible GUI design. On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:48 PM, William W. Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 12:14 PM 5/30/2008, John H Terpstra wrote: >> >> On Friday 30 May 2008 12:54:33 William W. Hammond wrote: >> > I was setting up Samba on an OpenSuS

Re: [Samba] guide for setting ACL's ?

On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Sam Ami <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all > > can anyone point me to a guide outlining setting samba ACL's > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > Its a starting

Re: [Samba] winbindd: Exceeding 200 client connections, no idle connection found

Jason Haar wrote: Elvar wrote: Yes, Squid comes with it's own NTLM AUTH mechanism but it does not support the --require-membership option which allows me to force users to be a part of a specific "internet access" group. That's why I'm using winbindd. This isn't the trusted domain issue

Re: [Samba] Migration from Ldap to Samba+Ldap

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Charlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I converted our networks to samba a decade or more ago, I started > out by trying to crack all our user passwords by brute force, but I > could only get about 90% of them in any reasonable time frame. So, Wow. *Only* 90

Re: [Samba] NetBIOS Hostname

At 12:14 PM 5/30/2008, John H Terpstra wrote: On Friday 30 May 2008 12:54:33 William W. Hammond wrote: > I was setting up Samba on an OpenSuSE 10.3 i386 computer. > > At the last minute I decided to enter a NetBIOS Hostname, big mistake. > A message popped up warning me that entering a NetBIOS Ho

Re: [Samba] NetBIOS Hostname

On Friday 30 May 2008 12:54:33 William W. Hammond wrote: > I was setting up Samba on an OpenSuSE 10.3 i386 computer. > > At the last minute I decided to enter a NetBIOS Hostname, big mistake. > A message popped up warning me that entering a NetBIOS Hostname would > create a new UID and Clients may

Re: [Samba] Migration from Ldap to Samba+Ldap

The MD5 hash you are using for your LDAP "userPassword" attribute is non-reversible - there isn't any straightforward way to convert it into anything else. Unless you happen to have a supercomputer grid handy to brute-force crack them, that is. See, whenever you use that password, your machine ta

Re: [Samba] NetBIOS Hostname

At 11:10 AM 5/30/2008, Rob Shinn wrote: On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:54 PM, William W. Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I was setting up Samba on an OpenSuSE 10.3 i386 computer. At the last minute I decided to enter a NetBIOS Hostname, big mistake. While this may be

[Samba] any idea what these messages mean?

I get these messages in my log file and have no idea what they are or what they mean. Samba works fine on this system and others. It only takes up useless space in the log file. May 24 07:55:03 us12253 daemon:err|error smbd[1169060]: Initializing DMAPI: AIX DMAPI(02/1997) 1.1 May 24 07:55:12 us1

Re: [Samba] NetBIOS Hostname

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:54 PM, William W. Hammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was setting up Samba on an OpenSuSE 10.3 i386 computer. > > At the last minute I decided to enter a NetBIOS Hostname, big mistake. While this may be a question better suited to the OpenSUSE list than this one, you

Re: [Samba] Mapping of Unix groups to Samba user permissions

Richard Foltyn wrote: On 5/30/08, Lars Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately, the group-write permission will not propagate that way, so a cron job runs twice a day to set group-write on all directories with the tree of each share. BTW, you don't need a cron job to do that s

Re: [Samba] problems w/samba-3.0.30 and NT4 PDC

On Friday 30 May 2008, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 01:15:13PM -0400, Chris Smith wrote: > > After upgrading to samba-3.0.30 on domain member servers using NT4 > > as PDC and running winbind users can no longer access the shares, > > they get prompted for passwords (which shouldn

[Samba] patch-3.0.29 to 3.0.30 broken

Jerry, The patch for 3.0.29 to 3.0.30 is broken; can you fix? James -- Patch Results -- Patch #10 (patch-3.0.29-3.0.30.diffs.gz): + /usr/bin/gzip -d + patch -p1 -s 146 out of 146 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file docs/Samba3-ByExample.pdf.rej 8 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to fil

[Samba] NetBIOS Hostname

I was setting up Samba on an OpenSuSE 10.3 i386 computer. At the last minute I decided to enter a NetBIOS Hostname, big mistake. A message popped up warning me that entering a NetBIOS Hostname would create a new UID and Clients may no longer be able to connect. The Message was correct Howeve

Re: [Samba] problems w/samba-3.0.30 and NT4 PDC

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 01:15:13PM -0400, Chris Smith wrote: > After upgrading to samba-3.0.30 on domain member servers using NT4 as > PDC and running winbind users can no longer access the shares, they get > prompted for passwords (which shouldn't happen) yet still cannot > connect. Dropping ba

[Samba] problems w/samba-3.0.30 and NT4 PDC

After upgrading to samba-3.0.30 on domain member servers using NT4 as PDC and running winbind users can no longer access the shares, they get prompted for passwords (which shouldn't happen) yet still cannot connect. Dropping back to 3.0.28a works (even after adding the recent security patch) fi

Re: [Samba] Winbind: SID2UID looks in own domain only ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian McHugh wrote: > Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: >> This is a limitation of the idmap_ad pliugin currenytly (bug or RFE >> depending on how you look at it). The plugin doesn't have a proper >> connection mgr to contact more than its primary doma

Re: [Samba] Winbind: SID2UID looks in own domain only ?

Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote: This is a limitation of the idmap_ad pliugin currenytly (bug or RFE depending on how you look at it). The plugin doesn't have a proper connection mgr to contact more than its primary domain. Good to know. It has been a major problem for us, running multiple domain

[Samba] Version 3.2.0pre3-9.fc9 smbclient problem

I recently installed Fedora 9 for use as a squid server. We use smb_auth basic authorization and have run into a problem with it. I believe that I have tracked the problem down to smbclient when the USER environmental variable contains the userid and password. smb_auth.sh in squid uses the USER

Re: [Samba] cannot add new machines to domain - Stumped

On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 08:19 +0200, David Böhm wrote: > > No prob :) It didn't show up because it's a default value in later > > versions of Samba and as I recall, testparm only outputs non-defaults. > > I'm sure we'll get this, although I have to be honest and tell you I > > haven't used LDAP (yet

[Samba] ldap groups?

Hi, In the past I have created an LDAP group 'Accounting' and used that group to set permissions on shares coming from a Windows 2003 server. I am now trying to create a group 'Marketing' for the same purpose. I have created the group in phpLdapAdmin and created the group using smbldap-groupadd. O

Re: [Samba] Roaming Profiles Load Very Slowly

On 5/30/2008, L.P.H. van Belle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: and this is why you also must check you Temp and internet Temp Unless someone intentionally moved them, these ARE IN THE LOCAL SETTINGS FOLDER so NO, you do NOT need to worry about these. This is very simple to check - do you see a

RE: [Samba] samba-3.0.29

> On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:54:39AM +0200, Sascha Bieler wrote: > > I have a share and in this share I specified: > > > > write list = antivir > > > > And I am not able to write with this user to this share. Setting read > > only = no is a workaround for me but not wanted. > > From which version

Re: [Samba] samba-3.0.29

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:54:39AM +0200, Sascha Bieler wrote: > I have a share and in this share I specified: > > write list = antivir > > And I am not able to write with this user to this share. Setting read only = > no is a workaround for me but not wanted. From which version did you upgrade?

[Samba] Migration from Ldap to Samba+Ldap

Hello, I'm trying to migrate openldap users to a samba+ldap solution. I had set up the samba+ldap server succesfully, and restored my accounts via smbldap-populate and an ldif file. But all my LDAP accounts didn't got all the samba field and i'm forced to update it manually via smbldap-usermod

RE: [Samba] samba-3.0.29

> > since I upgraded to samba 3.0.29 the parameter "write list" does no > longer > > work. > > Anyone else who has same experience? > > More specific examples of the problem please. > > Jeremy. I have a share and in this share I specified: write list = antivir And I am not able to write with t

Re: [Samba] Mapping of Unix groups to Samba user permissions

On 5/30/08, Lars Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Unfortunately, the group-write permission > will not propagate that way, so a cron job runs twice a day to set > group-write on all directories with the tree of each share. BTW, you don't need a cron job to do that since samba can manage this for

Re: [Samba] Directory permission windows issue

Hi Conor, On Wed, 28 May 2008 21:49:33 +0100 "Conor O'Callaghan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The kernel has acl support and the share partition is mounted with acls > support. The problem occurs on directories, when you set permissions, the > permissions will change but windows properties show a