Re: [Samba] CTDB + Samba + Winbind + ActiveDirectory

2009-01-08 Thread tim clusters
Hi Michael, Disabling "sendfile" smb.conf option seems to fix this issue (finger's crossed :-)). Please see more detailed explanation in: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6019 Thanks for your guidance, -Tim On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 11:21 AM, tim clusters wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I sincer

Re: [Samba] Samba performance issue

2009-01-08 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:24:16AM -0800, rhubbell wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 08:27 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:27:53PM +0100, Fabien wrote: > > > Thanks for the information. > > > > > > Do you know why the smbclient, although faster, is not fast enough to go >

Re: [Samba] cups_async_callback(504) error after upgrade to 3.2.7

2009-01-08 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 06:16:58PM -0800, Ed Kasky wrote: > > This is what I could cull from the log that looks relevant: > > [2009/01/07 18:04:05, 5] printing/print_cups.c:cups_pcap_load_async(366) > cups_pcap_load_async: asynchronously loading cups printers > [2009/01/07 18:04:05, 10] printing

Re: [Samba] CTDB + Samba + Winbind + ActiveDirectory

2009-01-08 Thread tim clusters
Hi Michael, I sincerely appreciate your detailed response. We migrated from Active Directory 2008 + idmap backend=RID to Active Directory 2003 + ServiceForUnix + idmap backend=AD and now we have Samba clients authenticate/mount shares from CTDB managed servers. Now, we are seeing strange case of

RE: [Samba] Samba + Windows 2003 AD

2009-01-08 Thread Avron Gray
I have two domains. One is production and one is development. - - - - - - Development domain: bash-2.05# cat /etc/resolv.conf domain dev.ca search dev.ca nameserver yyy.yyy.yyy.xx nameserver yyy.yyy.yyy.yy bash-2.05# ping -I 1 dev.ca PING dev.ca: 56 data bytes 64 bytes from ddc01.dev.ca (yyy.yyy

RE: [Samba] Samba + Windows 2003 AD

2009-01-08 Thread Henrik Dige Semark
When I run mail:~# ping -I eth3 bgdc.birke-gym.dk PING bgdc.birke-gym.dk (10.3.17.1) from 10.3.16.1 eth3: 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from bgdc.birke-gym.dk (10.3.17.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=128 time=0.142 ms 64 bytes from bgdc.birke-gym.dk (10.3.17.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=128 time=0.230 ms but if I ju

RE: [Samba] Samba + Windows 2003 AD

2009-01-08 Thread Avron Gray
Is the name of the existing Windows Domain "UNDERVISNING.LOCAL"? On my host: tstsmb08|/#ping -I 1 domain.ca PING domain.ca: 56 data bytes 64 bytes from dc2.domain.ca (192.168.1.12): icmp_seq=0. time=1.12 ms 64 bytes from dc2.domain.ca (192.168.1.12): icmp_seq=1. time=0.622 ms ^C Now, if you run

RE: [Samba] Samba + Windows 2003 AD

2009-01-08 Thread Henrik Dige Semark
Im trying to join a already existing Windows Domain :) Med Venlig Hilsen / Best regards Henrik Dige Semark > Subject: RE: [Samba] Samba + Windows 2003 AD > Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:22:05 -0700 > From: ag...@aeso.ca > To: hendig...@hotmail.com; samba@lists.samba.org > > Are you trying t

Re: [Samba] If we use vfork, can the smbd and nmbd work rightly?

2009-01-08 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:37:40AM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 02:51:55PM +0800, shrek wu wrote: > > I has been trying to port the Samba package to uClinux. But our uClinux > > toolchain doesn't support the fork() call. > > I must replace the fork with vfork.If we use vf

Re: [Samba] Samba performance issue

2009-01-08 Thread rhubbell
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 08:27 -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:27:53PM +0100, Fabien wrote: > > Thanks for the information. > > > > Do you know why the smbclient, although faster, is not fast enough to go > > over 80Mo/s ? > > > > Is there any plan to do the fiddly work on

RE: [Samba] Samba + Windows 2003 AD

2009-01-08 Thread Avron Gray
Are you trying to join an existing Windows domain? Or create a new domain? - Avron -Original Message- From: samba-bounces+agray=aeso...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+agray=aeso...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Henrik Dige Semark Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:16 AM To: Samb

RE: [Samba] Samba + Windows 2003 AD

2009-01-08 Thread Henrik Dige Semark
How can I ping UNDERVISNING.LOCAL when its just the domain ? the windows server that runs the domain is bgdc.birke-gym.dk and I can ping that just fine My resolv.conf --- search birke-gym.dk nameserver 127.0.0.1 My nsswitch.conf --- passwd: files winbind comp

RE: [Samba] Samba + Windows 2003 AD

2009-01-08 Thread Henrik Dige Semark
Sorry to Avron for sending my answer direct and not over the groupe :) Hey thanx for the quick answer :) When I try the net ads testjoin its not very informative :P # net ads testjoin ma...@undervisning.local's password: [2009/01/08 17:39:52, 0] utils/net_ads.c:ads_st

Re: [Samba] Compiling Samba 3.2.7 fails on RHEL 4

2009-01-08 Thread Linux Addict
Taylor, Marc wrote: My apologies if I sent this email to Seeger directly in error. Any clues to the problem I posted below? Thanks! Marc -Original Message- From: Taylor, Marc Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 14:06 To: 'Karolin Seeger' Subject: RE: [Samba] compiling 3.2.6 fails on fed

[Samba] Compiling Samba 3.2.7 fails on RHEL 4

2009-01-08 Thread Taylor, Marc
My apologies if I sent this email to Seeger directly in error. Any clues to the problem I posted below? Thanks! Marc -Original Message- From: Taylor, Marc Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 14:06 To: 'Karolin Seeger' Subject: RE: [Samba] compiling 3.2.6 fails on fedora 10 i386 Karolin,

Re: [Samba] Samba performance issue

2009-01-08 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:27:53PM +0100, Fabien wrote: > Thanks for the information. > > Do you know why the smbclient, although faster, is not fast enough to go > over 80Mo/s ? > > Is there any plan to do the fiddly work on the smbfs implementation to > make it as fast as smbclient ? :) smbf

RE: [Samba] Samba + Windows 2003 AD

2009-01-08 Thread Avron Gray
Have you run: net ads testjoin Does it say "Join is OK"? This might not be related... I had to compile samba 3.0.33 to get around a Windows Domain restriction issue: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4771 The bug indicates that if the \NETLOGON pipe is opened up on the Windows AD serv

[Samba] Samba + Windows 2003 AD

2009-01-08 Thread Henrik Dige Semark
Hey, I don't know if this is the right list to ask this question in, but I have tried on the IRC (irc.freenode.net #samba) and people on there advised me to try here instead. I have: Debian 4.0r4 Samba version 3.0.24 - mail.birke-gym.dk - 10.3.16.1 krb5 Version 1.4.4-7etch6 Kernel Version 2.6

[Samba] Shared homes in a different samba server

2009-01-08 Thread Mario Giammarco
Hello, I have a pdc with shared homes and roaming profiles. I would like to put the homes share in openfiler (a samba/san appliance). Is it possible? I am asking because I am failing to do it. Thanks in advance for any reply! Mario -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and re

[Samba] Samba shared homes without roaming profiles

2009-01-08 Thread Mario Giammarco
Hello, I would like to put users homes in a central (backupped) server. But I do not want to use roaming profiles, I would like a solution similar to solaris /exports/home. Is it possible with samba? Thanks in advance, Mario -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the

Re: [Samba] TDB Corruption.

2009-01-08 Thread Linux Addict
Michael Adam wrote: Linux Addict wrote: Hello, I have relatively a large setup where RHEL 4 authenticating MS W2K3 R2. Every often a host may not be able to authenticate due tdb corruption and we had to rm the *.tdb and files and restart the winbind which would create fresh tdb files. I g

Re: [Samba] Samba performance issue

2009-01-08 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:27:53PM +0100, Fabien wrote: > Thanks for the information. > > Do you know why the smbclient, although faster, is not fast enough to go > over 80Mo/s ? No, not from the top of my head. This needs much closer investigation. Volker pgpCbC6MT7n10.pgp Description: PGP s

Re: [Samba] Samba performance issue

2009-01-08 Thread Fabien
Thanks for the information. Do you know why the smbclient, although faster, is not fast enough to go over 80Mo/s ? Is there any plan to do the fiddly work on the smbfs implementation to make it as fast as smbclient ? :) I didn't try the fuse implemtations yet. I found two : "SMB for Fuse"

Re: [Samba] smbcontrol smbd ping also answered by nmbd and winbindd

2009-01-08 Thread Michael Weiser
Hello Jeremy, thanks for your answer. On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 04:17:40PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > with samba-3.0.x an "smbcontrol smbd ping" was answered by all running > > smbd processes. With samba-3.2.x it is now *also* answered by nmbd and > > winbindd: > Yeah - Herb found this proble

[Samba] Wrong behaviour in pdb_get_set.c: pdb_get_pass_can_change_time?

2009-01-08 Thread Nima Saed-Samii
Dear List, we have several server installations in local schools serving files with samba. The users are stored within an ldap database. We then tried to set the smabaPwdCanChange time somewhere in the future, but had to see, that samba didn't honored the given value. I then got the source, looked

Re: [Samba] TDB Corruption.

2009-01-08 Thread Michael Adam
Linux Addict wrote: > Hello, I have relatively a large setup where RHEL 4 authenticating MS > W2K3 R2. Every often a host may not be able to authenticate due tdb > corruption and we had to rm the *.tdb and files and restart the winbind > which would create fresh tdb files. I guess Redhat ackno

Re: [Samba] CTDB + Samba + Winbind + ActiveDirectory

2009-01-08 Thread Michael Adam
Hi Tim, sorry, I somehow lost track of our earlier mail thread(s)... tim clusters wrote: > Hi All, > > Are there any special CTDB/SMB configuration settings/dependencies to manage > Winbind across CTDB managed servers authenticating via Active > Directory(AD)? An example would be Samba's IDMAP b

Re: [Samba] If we use vfork, can the smbd and nmbd work rightly?

2009-01-08 Thread Volker Lendecke
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 02:51:55PM +0800, shrek wu wrote: > I has been trying to port the Samba package to uClinux. But our uClinux > toolchain doesn't support the fork() call. > I must replace the fork with vfork.If we use vfork, the smbd and nmbd can > not work rightly. > both samba-3.0.32 and sa