All of my nested groups are missing after building Samba 3.3.3. For example,
using the local "Administrators" group with Domain\Domain Admins was not
built by default, nor was the local "Users" group that would normally have
"Domain Users" in it. Aren't these supposed to be visible after I join th
What about unix extensions? enabled or disabled? Unix extensions seem
to bypass force group statements...
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Goldschrafe, Jeffrey wrote:
>> Hi there!
>>
>> I'm having some strange permissions issues w
Dear
i'm trying to run samba4 on a debian lenny with LDAP backend
when execute
slapd -f /etc/samba/ldap/slapd.conf -h ldapi://%2Fetc%2Fsamba%2Fldap%
2Fldapi -d4294967295
the slapd server crash with this output :
<<< dnPrettyNormal: ,
line 57 (refint_attributes nonSecurityMemberBL nonSecurit
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:46:53AM -0400, Goldschrafe, Jeffrey wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I'm having some strange permissions issues with one of my systems that's
> on an Active Directory domain.
>
> Here's the basic background:
>
> - System is joined to AD domain. Users authenticate fine via Kerbe
Hi there!
I'm having some strange permissions issues with one of my systems that's
on an Active Directory domain.
Here's the basic background:
- System is joined to AD domain. Users authenticate fine via Kerberos,
and are authorized via an AD user group. They can browse the share,
create files,
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 12:30 +, Brebner, Gavin wrote:
> Problem seen on more than 1 server, and more than 1 client type.
> Windows clients = Windows Server 2003 or Windows XP sp3.
> Samba = 3.0-25b or 3.2.3 (clustered)
> My clients connect ok, and I have no problems with basic operations - copyi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Williams wrote:
> jerry wrote:
>>
>>
>> You might want to search bugzilla.samba.org. There was a recent
>> reporter having some broken behavior with "force group". I don't
>> remember the specifics or version.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> is there another
jerry wrote:
You might want to search bugzilla.samba.org. There was a recent
reporter having some broken behavior with "force group". I don't
remember the specifics or version.
is there another way other then using force group = grants that will
make the group ownership of any files/f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Williams wrote:
> I have shares such as the one below. Users in the group (in this
> example, the group grants) can access the root directory of the share
> (\\roark\grants) just fine, and it and all files and subfolder
> permissions are 770 and
I have shares such as the one below. Users in the group (in this
example, the group grants) can access the root directory of the share
(\\roark\grants) just fine, and it and all files and subfolder
permissions are 770 and owned by the group grants, but users have
problems going into subfolders
Problem seen on more than 1 server, and more than 1 client type.
Windows clients = Windows Server 2003 or Windows XP sp3.
Samba = 3.0-25b or 3.2.3 (clustered)
My clients connect ok, and I have no problems with basic operations - copying
files etc. However, if I run applications in a cygwin
envi
Hello,
I have been using Samba for years (login onto the PC, files and
printers sharing) and since recently I have a LDAP server running and
serving authentication to few Unix systems (mail, web, Zope, ssh,
etc.)
Now that I set-up a new server to use with Samba, I would like to
integrate Samba in
12 matches
Mail list logo
