> I have question about samba performance with multi-thread and multi core
> cpu.
>
> What can we do for samba performance with multi-thread and multi core ?
>
Each connected user gets their own process and thus threads. The
system will balance the threads over the cpus.
John
--
To unsubscribe f
Hi fellows
I have question about samba performance with multi-thread and multi core
cpu.
What can we do for samba performance with multi-thread and multi core ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
John Goubeaux wrote:
>>
>> John,
>>
>> You can migrate all your /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, /etc/group entries to
>> LDAP using the PADL Migration Tools. See:
>> http://www.padl.com/OSS/MigrationTools.html
>>
>> After the UNIX system accounts have been migrated to LDAP, just execute:
>> pdbedit -
Am Dienstag, 19. Mai 2009 schrieb Volker Lendecke:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 02:26:25PM -0500, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> > >From your description, it seems that there is a lot going on.
> >
> > Unfortunately, I don't personally know nearly enough about the OS/2
> > implementation of SMB. I k
John,
You can migrate all your /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, /etc/group entries to
LDAP using the PADL Migration Tools. See:
http://www.padl.com/OSS/MigrationTools.html
After the UNIX system accounts have been migrated to LDAP, just execute:
pdbedit -i smbpasswd -e ldapsam
pdbedit -
John Goubeaux wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I have a new build of samba 3.3.0 ( stand alone file server ) which is
> configured to find all user data in an ldap directory, eg passdb backend
> = ldapsam. After testing I have confirmed that it all seems to work as
> it should with a test set of users.
>
>
Folks,
I have a new build of samba 3.3.0 ( stand alone file server )
which is configured to find all user data in an ldap directory, eg
passdb backend = ldapsam. After testing I have confirmed that it all
seems to work as it should with a test set of users.
Now I need to figure out the be
Miguel Medalha wrote:
or are you saying "nss_base_hosts
ou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one" is wrong?
I don't know about NFS, but from the point of view of a Samba PDC the
above is wrong. Computers are also domain users and as such they must
be referred to the "nss_base_passwd" dir
or are you saying "nss_base_hosts
ou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one" is wrong?
I don't know about NFS, but from the point of view of a Samba PDC the
above is wrong. Computers are also domain users and as such they must be
referred to the "nss_base_passwd" directive.
Quoting from
dogb...@infinito.it wrote:
Miguel Medalha wrote:
Based on your smb.conf, you must have the following entries in
/etc/ldap.conf
nss_base_passwdou=Users,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
nss_base_passwdou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
nss_base_shadowou=Users,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
nss_
Miguel Medalha wrote:
nss_base_passwdou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
should be nss_base_hostsou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
No, it shouldn't. From the point of view of a Windows domain,
computers are users too. The Samba manual even makes a joke about
that, saying tha
If I try to connect with a user that exist in both the LDAP and etc/passwd
files I cannot get it to authenticate (error user is invalid or bad
password) but I don't get any log in the samba files
It means that the error precedes Samba.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL
Did you install libnss-ldap and libpam-ldap? You need those.
Also, in /etc/nsswitch.conf:
passwd: files ldap
shadow: files ldap
group: files ldap
I found that Samba works better with the "ldpasam:trusted = yes"
parameter. In this case, your LDAP database MUST contain the entire
POSIX accoun
nss_base_passwdou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
should be
nss_base_hostsou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
No, it shouldn't. From the point of view of a Windows domain, computers
are users too. The Samba manual even makes a joke about that, saying
that "computers are peo
after many tries and upgrading my samba to 3.2.5, the sharing is
working... kind of.
now everyone can access their exclusive folders on the server, also can
acess the public folder (anyone can access this folder without
authentication). when people try to access folders that they should not
acc
From: rhy...@hotmail.com
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: language charset problem！
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 02:10:45 +
dear all， I port samba 3.0.0 to board ,and it is almost ok. but there still
some problem about file display can't be resolved. I use charset C
1 chinese name
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:19:34PM +0100, peter pilsl wrote:
> A more detailed log at Loglevel=15 can be viewed at :
> http://www.goldfisch.at/temp/smb.log.txt (~150kB)
I never understand why people cut log files. There is NO
indication whatsoever about any failure, but a lot of
indication that p
On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 16:24 -0500, Mike Eggleston wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009, simo might have said:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 16:17 -0500, Mike Eggleston wrote:
> > > Morning,
> > >
> > > Well I ordered a Windows Server 2008 Standard for a need around here and
> > > after just spending an hou
On 18-May-09, at 11:48 PM, Michael Heydon wrote:
DNK wrote:
Why would this happen?
No idea...
Is there any disadvantage or security concern by using the "users =
@group" style?
Yes, the users option does something completely different to the
valid users option. While there may be some s
I have a very strange problem and I'm doomed. In a samba-domain with XP-clients
certain users cannot logon to some computers.
The user tries to logon but *immediately* gets the message "you cant get logged
on. please check username and domain and retype your password" (translated from
german)
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 09:31:30AM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
No problem. To the 3.4 branch or the 4.0? Also, as I stated before,
I'm more than happy to help in any way I can.
3.4. please.
Volker
Here ya go. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns:
https:
Volker Lendecke wrote:
Send more logs -- at least 1000 lines before that event
please. bzip2 should nicely compress that.
Attached
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Hello Good Peopple,
I had install a samba PDC server with openldap backend. It's working
but I have a lot messages at log.
What I'm doing wrong? ( Here http://pastebin.ca/1427490 , I put my smb.conf)
May 19 11:23:46 thome smbd[57069]: [2009/05/19 11:23:46, 0]
lib/util_sock.c:get_peer_addr_inte
2009/5/19 주원배 :
> Hi samba lists !!
>
>
>
>
>
> I’m found error message Windows XP
>
> “The network name cannot be found"
>
The XP client does not know the ip address of the samba server because
for some reason whatever method you are using for name to ipaddress
resolution temporarily stopped worki
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 09:31:30AM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
> No problem. To the 3.4 branch or the 4.0? Also, as I stated before,
> I'm more than happy to help in any way I can.
3.4. please.
Volker
pgpU2G7uFn8Br.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the foll
Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:36:12PM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
Probably beating a dead horse, but is it still the case (as it has been
for several years) that Samba incorrectly handles responses from LDAP's
ppolicy overlay?
As we are working more actively with bugzilla ag
I have a share on a disk with 120G free. But for some reason, all my CIFS
clients report only 14.4G empty. Depending on what I'm trying to do with
the share, the client may happily ignore the supposed free space limitation,
but some programs actually give me a warning and refuse to work, "Error,
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:14:54AM +0100, Andrew Porter wrote:
> Below is a log file of a panic that occurs on two different sites
> running Debian Stable Samba 3.2.5. The problem is triggered by Sophos
> Control Centre doing it's hourly check for updates, and as SCC is
> running on a user's PC
Hi fellows. I'm new to the list and hope I'll have a nice time here.
one of my servers running samba+ldap is not working properly.
the setup is:
Debian 5
fileserver:/etc/samba#smbd --version
Version 3.0.24
fileserver:/etc/samba# slapd -V
@(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.3.30 (Oct 5 2008 22
Below is a log file of a panic that occurs on two different sites
running Debian Stable Samba 3.2.5. The problem is triggered by Sophos
Control Centre doing it's hourly check for updates, and as SCC is
running on a user's PC in both cases causes problems for the user. I've
tried everything an
Miguel Medalha wrote:
> Based on your smb.conf, you must have the following entries in
> /etc/ldap.conf
>
> nss_base_passwdou=Users,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
> nss_base_passwdou=Computers,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
> nss_base_shadowou=Users,dc=DOMAIN,dc=IT?one
> nss_base_group
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 01:36:12PM -0400, Ryan Steele wrote:
> Probably beating a dead horse, but is it still the case (as it has been
> for several years) that Samba incorrectly handles responses from LDAP's
> ppolicy overlay?
As we are working more actively with bugzilla again now, can
you ple
Hi samba lists !!
I’m found error message Windows XP
“The network name cannot be found"
When I try to connect to smb server that is mapped e:
1. I was downloading very large file 40GByte with torrent during 5
hours.
2. This error occurred!
3. But web server and tel
I have set up strace on both servers, and i will be waiting for the
problem to happen again.
Unfortunately it might a a while.
With regards,
Kasper Eenberg
HOVMARK DATA
Ravnevej 13
dk-6705 Esbjerg Ø
tlf: +45 76 12 59
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 08:35:20AM +0200, Kasper Sacharias Eenberg wrote:
> I'm having some problems with one thread of samba, taking excessive CPU
> usage.
Can you do an strace on those servers? If they are still
serving syscalls and signals, please send a
smbcontrol debug 10
and send the resu
35 matches
Mail list logo
