After giving up on trying to slim down smbtree, I've seemingly worked
out enough of the NetBIOS and SMB/CIFS protocols to implement a
bare-bones replacement in Python. At less than 500 lines, it's pretty
easy to follow, though it's very hackish and badly needs a clean
rewrite (which I'm working
root root 4096 2009-09-11 09:10 xxx
drwxrwx---+ 17 root root 4096 2009-08-04 16:03 iat_fuer_alle
-rwxrwx---+ 1 root Domain Users7 2009-09-11 09:23
wernera-test-20090911.txt
zksfs:/data1/LW-I/Dokumente#
The file wernera-test-20090911.txt is created by myself via
HI!!
I have a problem with Samba and a Domain Controller. I have a server which
it was running with samba and a Windows Server 2000 domain controller, and
its was worked correctly. Now the domain controller has been changed for a
Windows Server 2008 and now it doesnt work. I need your help
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello:
Our scenario:
- - Our domain (ABRANTINA) is a Windows 2003R2 AD (RFC2307 enabled)
- - Trusted domain (REDE-LC) is a Windows 2003R2 AD
- - cafs01tst is a Debian stable based SAMBA 3.2.5 file server
Our goal:
- - Serve home and shares for users
Hi!
when i try to migrate files from nt4 share to smb share ...
net rpc share migrate files SHARE_DATA -I 172.10.10.1 -S NT4 \
--acls --timestamps -v
works, but
net rpc share migrate files SHARE_DATA -I 172.10.10.1 -S NT4 \
--acls --attrs --timestamps -v
syncing[SHARE_DATA] files and
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:28:46AM +0200, Axel Werner wrote:
Whenever a Windows User creates a file at the same location, the new
File belongs to root and Group Domain Users. Me and my Users would
expect the new File would belong to the Creator (User). But for some
reason this is not
There had been some bugs in 3.3.2 preventing that unfortunately. We are
currently preparing an update to 3.4.1 for F11.
Could you please give
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9443
a try (and leave positive feedback if it works for you) ?
This worked for me.
Thanks
Guys
Can maybe someone help me to understand the nature of my problem.
1. I have Samba 3.0.32c with ADS on Solaris 9 server
2. Client run daily jobs from thr Windows which read data and write to
the log files on the samba share
3. Occasionally he started getting the problem that when job
Hi everybody,
in reply to http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-September/150448.html
i am running Samba 3.4.0 on Ubuntu 8.04 (from
http://ppa.launchpad.net/pgquiles/ppa/ubuntu hardy main).
The tdbsam is within the LDAP Server (created with gosa and Samba 3.0.28).
I installed also two
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 06:40:02AM -0600, Anthony Powell wrote:
There had been some bugs in 3.3.2 preventing that unfortunately. We are
currently preparing an update to 3.4.1 for F11.
Could you please give
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-9443
a try (and leave
I'm new to SAMBA, so I apologize up front if I ask a dumb question! We upgraded
from solaris 8 (samba2.2.8a) to solaris 10 and installed samba 3.2.4. When
user tried to use samba, they got Failed to open
/usr/local/samba/private/secrets.tdb. I thought maybe the file just needed to
be there,
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:27 PM, Adam Nielsen adam.niel...@uq.edu.auwrote:
I wish I can put gdb, but when tdb files get corrupted, I cant login to
the host even as a local user on console. Winbind seems to be locking
the whole authentication stream. I don't understand why even the local
Hello *,
I've fileserver with Debian Lenny and Samba 3.2.5 from the distro.
I want the server to notify clients on some events with a popup.
# smbclient -M Client01
Connection to Client01 failed. Error NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME
but:
# smbclient -L Client01 -U myuser
Enter myuser's password:
2009/8/30 Gary Greene gree...@altimatos.com:
On Sunday 30 August 2009 04:24:05 am Juan Miscaro wrote:
2009/8/17 Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch:
Am 17.08.2009 um 21:40 schrieb Steve Litt:
Hi all,
This isn't meant to be a troll. It's a legitimate question asked because
I haven't done much with
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Juan Miscaro jmisc...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/30 Gary Greene gree...@altimatos.com:
On Sunday 30 August 2009 04:24:05 am Juan Miscaro wrote:
2009/8/17 Marc Balmer m...@msys.ch:
Am 17.08.2009 um 21:40 schrieb Steve Litt:
Hi all,
This isn't meant to be a
Hi,
Did you get a chance to test it with 3.4.0? I have 3.3.7 installed - Windows
7 RTM joins the domain (with the primary dns suffix error) but cannot log in
to as I get the trust error (output in the log.smbd is the same as everyone
elses). The regkeys mentioned are all applied btw.
I would
So, I did some digging through Bug 6099 on Bugzilla and read the comments (
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6099
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6099 ). I followed the guidance
of Guenther and only the following regkeys are required to get domain
joining and login working
Hello,
I've been using Samba on a Sun server but we recently discontinued using the
Sun and switched to using Samba on a RH linux server. I can't get file
sharing to work on the new server. When I test the connection to the samba
server (velar) by running smbclient //velar/homes -U eric I get
This is on 32 bit x86 on a Dell 1950
After mouting a cifs share we have 5 second hiccups. Typical log output
when doing a simple ls /mnt:
Sep 4 16:21:43 rd-spare kernel: fs/cifs/transport.c: For smb_command 50
Sep 4 16:21:43 rd-spare kernel: fs/cifs/transport.c: Sending smb:
total_len 118
Hello, Gary!
Thank you very much for your reply!
I read your entire post and am still not sure of what you want. Can you
define the roles that the various computers will be playing vis-a-vis
Samba - such as:
Vista: Samba client
Fedora: Linux file server
Solaris: does not participate
Dear
according this wiki
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ldapsam_Editposix
i have enable EditPosix extension but i receive this error
Ignoring unknown parameter idmap domains
How can i fix it ?
Here it is my smb.conf :
[global]
workgroup = MSHOME
netbios name = PC-DTOUZEAU
server string = %h
kmorning wrote:
I installed windows 7 RC and was able to join my samba 3.3.6 domain and
just as with server 2008r2 I ran into the trust relationship issue when
trying to log into the domain. At this point I became a little frustrated
since it seems everyone else here has had success with
SkyBeam wrote:
However the error about changing the primary DNS domain remained.
I don't know if this is relevant at all or just annoying. The DNS suffix
for the connection is published by the DHCP server here. But maybe the
message is about something else.
I just discovered that this
SkyBeam wrote:
The work-around I am using now is that I renamed my domain using smb.conf
from DOMAIN to domain.local (equal to the DNS suffix). Samba
automatically created a new sambaDomainName entry in LDAP which uses the
same domain SID. Surprisingly even my vista machine which was
SkyBeam wrote:
Alternatively you might set the following registry REG_SZ value:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\System\DNSClient\NV
PrimaryDnsSuffix
Set the value to the desired domain sufix (e.g. domain.local). Then
reboot the machine and see 'ipconfig /all' printing your
airwofl wrote:
Did you get a chance to test it with 3.4.0? I have 3.3.7 installed -
Windows 7 RTM joins the domain (with the primary dns suffix error) but
cannot log in to as I get the trust error (output in the log.smbd is the
same as everyone elses). The regkeys mentioned are all applied
On the smb.conf there is a parameter on the Global section called
winbind cache time I think that is your answer.
Schneider, Craig-P65851 wrote:
If a user changes their password and the client looses network
connectivity prior to them logging in again their local/cached password
is not
Is there a config option to allow client file create date time stamps on
windows to show up on the linux side.
I'm running samba-3.0.33-3.7.el5 on 2.6.18-128.el5
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Jk
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 12:33:21 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter c...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
It looks like it's just taking 5s for the server to respond here. Do
you happen to have a wire capture of one of these events? That may tell
us more than
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
My suspicion would be that the server needs to perform an oplock break
to another client before it can send the response. The only way I know
how to tell that is to sniff all SMB traffic on the server and watch
for oplock break calls to other clients
Hi,
i have a problem regarding smbcquota..when i try to set the quota using
smbcquota an error will come out :
error:
failed session setup with NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
cli_full_connection failed! (NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE)
i hope you guys can help me with this. Is there any other configuration
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 12:27:35 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter c...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
This is on 32 bit x86 on a Dell 1950
After mouting a cifs share we have 5 second hiccups. Typical log output
when doing a simple ls /mnt:
Sep 4 16:21:43 rd-spare kernel: fs/cifs/transport.c: For
On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
It looks like it's just taking 5s for the server to respond here. Do
you happen to have a wire capture of one of these events? That may tell
us more than cifsFYI info...
I did a tcpdump and nothing stands out. Server acks the cmd 50 and then
waits 5
There is an option on the smb.conf that I think is the answer for you.
winbind cache time try that one.
Schneider, Craig-P65851 wrote:
If a user changes their password and the client looses network
connectivity prior to them logging in again their local/cached password
is not updated; they have
HI!!
I have a problem with Samba and a Domain Controller. I have a server which
it was running with samba and a Windows Server 2000 domain controller, and
its was worked correctly. Now the domain controller has been changed for a
Windows Server 2008 and now it doesnt work. I need your help
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
Unfortunately I doubt there's much you can do from your client to
prevent that (if that is the case). There may be a way to turn off
oplocks on the server side, but that may very well be even worse for
performance.
Also note that these hiccups occur
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
That'll stop your client from requesting oplocks, but that won't
prevent others from doing so. If my suspicion is correct, then another
client is holding an oplock and the server needs to break it before it
can reply to yours.
Unfortunately I doubt
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 13:07:52 -0400 (EDT)
Christoph Lameter c...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
My suspicion would be that the server needs to perform an oplock break
to another client before it can send the response. The only way I know
how to tell that
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
That sounds rather strange. Maybe we do have a bug of some sort? The
thing to do might be to get a binary capture of the 32-bit traffic
around the time of the stalls. We could then inspect the packets and
see whether we have something wrong in there.
Hello,
I do have a very strange behavior. For some reason, I only observe
this, when I access a samba share through an openvpn tunnel.
(1) objective
have a share, have SECURITY USERS (to control access rights), but NULL
PASSWORDS (authentication is fine enough by vpn). Find config files
below.
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
Well, I can see the delays in the capture, but the snarflen for the
capture is a little too small to tell much else. Can you redo the
capture with a larger snarflen (maybe -s 512 or so)?
-s 1000 version attached.
Also, were you able to tell anything
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
I assume that the 32 and 64 bit clients you have are calling ls in
the same dir. If so, maybe a similar capture from a 64-bit client might
help us see the difference?
64 bit trace attached.--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Jeff Layton wrote:
A couple of differences. First, the ls's were done in different
directories since they had different search patterns:
Right. 32 bit cannot mount the clameter directory for strange reasons. I
have to go one level higher.
The 64-bit capture was done in a
One other issue that may be important: The mounting operation is very slow
on 32 bit. Could it be that the handshake does not work out?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
HI!!
I have a problem with Samba and a Domain Controller. I have a server which
it was running with samba and a Windows Server 2000 domain controller, and
its was worked correctly. Now the domain controller has been changed for a
Windows Server 2008 and now it doesnt work. I need your help
Hi everybody,
in reply to http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2009-September/150448.html
i am running Samba 3.4.0 on Ubuntu 8.04 (from
http://ppa.launchpad.net/pgquiles/ppa/ubuntu hardy main).
The tdbsam is within the LDAP Server (created with gosa and Samba 3.0.28).
I installed also two
SkyBeam wrote:
I have posted all my experience and configuration I used within the
mailing list but it never gets accepted by moderators as it looks like. So
the approval is still pending. I've re-submitted all my posts to this
mailing list several times but got tired to re-submit over
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 03:57:46PM -0700, J Kelley wrote:
Is there a config option to allow client file create date time stamps on
windows to show up on the linux side.
I'm running samba-3.0.33-3.7.el5 on 2.6.18-128.el5
Not in this version. This is one of the things planned
for 3.5.0.
I have a windows 2003 server joined to my domain. I'd like to have IIS
6.0 on the 2k3 server authenticating against samba so that windows
sharepoint services can be used. I've tried getting NTLM authentication
working following instructions at
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:00:15PM -0500, Adam Williams wrote:
I have a windows 2003 server joined to my domain. I'd like to have IIS
6.0 on the 2k3 server authenticating against samba so that windows
sharepoint services can be used. I've tried getting NTLM authentication
working
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Anderson Stano adure...@dmepc.com.br wrote:
SkyBeam wrote:
I have posted all my experience and configuration I used within the
mailing list but it never gets accepted by moderators as it looks like. So
the approval is still pending. I've re-submitted all my
I have a problem with Samba and a Domain Controller. I have a server which
it was running with samba and a Windows Server 2000 domain controller, and
it’s was worked correctly. Now the domain controller has been changed for a
Windows Server 2008 and now it doesn’t work. I need your help to
As a quick update, with some off-list help, I've updated the code to
resolve a few interoperability issues that showed up on other networks
and to make some of the error handling more robust. To anyone who
downloaded version 0.01, I'd appreciate if you gave 0.05 a shot as
well:
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:00:15PM -0500, Adam Williams wrote:
I have a windows 2003 server joined to my domain. I'd like to have IIS
6.0 on the 2k3 server authenticating against samba so that windows
sharepoint services can be used. I've tried getting NTLM
Question about BDC's on a domain,
1) How can you verify that the BDC and PDC are communicating? (verify
they are both on the same domain and that one is a slave/backup?
basically verify that the reality matches what is setup in the config
files.)
2) If a BDC seems to no longer see the
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 12:25:00PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
[...]
Test reports still welcome.
thank you for a nice tool!
but on some hosts:
__cut__
Traceback (most recent call last):
File nbtls.py, line 39, in module
_addr, rdata = netbios.doit(bcaddr, '\1\2__MSBROWSE__\2', 1,
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:18 PM, christian sa...@sisyphus.ch wrote:
thank you for a nice tool!
Thanks. :)
__cut__
Traceback (most recent call last):
File nbtls.py, line 39, in module
_addr, rdata = netbios.doit(bcaddr, '\1\2__MSBROWSE__\2', 1,
broadcast=True)
File
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Matthew Dempsky matt...@dempsky.org wrote:
It looks like it can't find any master browsers on your network. Does
smbtree -NS work on this host?
Also, what's the output of nmblookup -M -- - on this host? (That's
two dashes, and then one dash.)
--
To unsubscribe
URL: http://build.samba.org/
--- /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt.old 2009-09-10
00:00:03.0 -0600
+++ /home/build/master/cache/broken_results.txt 2009-09-11 00:00:32.0
-0600
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Build status as of Thu Sep 10 06:00:01 2009
+Build status as of Fri Sep
The branch, master has been updated
via f009fa15a17d29e41e04eb950bafaea084d2c31d (commit)
via 8c58cef875b931cf6655d3b7002ed0a7fe32fe35 (commit)
from 88e2fbaf95da3783e1ba41d55dd2fbd8b792126f (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 4e98f93775762de18b0dfc31080af5c443324c70 (commit)
via 12c70251568a0c8b30215e5453c3ea6194c3503c (commit)
via bea8e5fa6038d5abd2ec1e12f9005c4a04abb79f (commit)
via 032e01e7c13724d057b5744d7d79613449c2f24f (commit)
via
The branch, master has been updated
via 741fe9d6a1833f358c32f91c5d7583c1c713110f (commit)
via 5b20af988c319f389e29db0a47d552c5f68aed58 (commit)
from 4e98f93775762de18b0dfc31080af5c443324c70 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via c6647bfd17539b9cca96e42b6871d16ef2fa728f (commit)
from 741fe9d6a1833f358c32f91c5d7583c1c713110f (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 8990865c7f5f52c615c5d571cec50d49deda7322 (commit)
from c6647bfd17539b9cca96e42b6871d16ef2fa728f (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
Hi Matthias,
- Log -
commit 7669bc3c89898c585a65547b246981ddcd0f49dc
Author: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer mwallnoe...@yahoo.de
Date: Thu Sep 10 07:17:40 2009 +0200
util_strlist: Add some more consts
Why this changes?
I
The branch, master has been updated
via f74e8c266f43d0c640ab8068d28a1b197164d548 (commit)
via 049c780c598a7cbfc17e4bc8a322e180f5b5472f (commit)
from 8990865c7f5f52c615c5d571cec50d49deda7322 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via cbac8e4fa02cb359efca9eb84b7b5b06008d7f6d (commit)
via 1d4bf0299304ca57a952932cd23db98bb2f35d3f (commit)
from f74e8c266f43d0c640ab8068d28a1b197164d548 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 61facf426691cc896ec61fde1c4cb7d947adb07b (commit)
via fd3a77839cf747ce884cbd4e1cc212f22c4836a2 (commit)
via d7d7613e31b010bc764616b3ea1d75f0c8c90235 (commit)
from cbac8e4fa02cb359efca9eb84b7b5b06008d7f6d (commit)
The branch, master has been updated
via bca75ecf9797df98a998eeb0b978cd2fe71ed2cb (commit)
from 61facf426691cc896ec61fde1c4cb7d947adb07b (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, v3-4-test has been updated
via 686439599ad78c6f4d5609129113e6da51fb4a57 (commit)
from f710535e947008a083b49d8a3faa117208616d7f (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-4-test
- Log -
The branch, master has been updated
via 9da49338043dedbf17c99ceed24c2934514d0157 (commit)
via 97182d52dfff8ceca797a5c96122bf94731e79f0 (commit)
via e4683bfb3b34eb4b0e9eecc5136d6bca9ce39369 (commit)
via bd7cf6988e0b63537d21735acbb79179bfb5bd8f (commit)
from
The branch, master has been updated
via 6b9298191a72c20e0e81298d06871181dd3b7826 (commit)
via 7165f29aeaf6607bfaab90c4d5e9eca280b4a27d (commit)
via f98470e3a4add69858e50ded0c7e01393b314473 (commit)
via 085c07b7431c7b96b30d29e3753dbd5fa71ff9ce (commit)
via
The branch, master has been updated
via ea2b9e0fb1dfd433e2dd054272f4ab8a37378178 (commit)
via 56c09d2fb23d652e48d5e9e5dcc6557c1a815a6b (commit)
via 82404ad3e47010f892dfae8e3633a1a8f5de6630 (commit)
via 629ff2b6e2ec7fbd1d1ccac8a7466462aa171d4f (commit)
via
The branch, master has been updated
via 9741cb7638d4da777aa7dfa0eb7618b26795a657 (commit)
via ee1fe382d662998370e66d08bcebbc153fca7b5a (commit)
via 50347d6ac061e735b2dd8874d00c663b9f6aeb59 (commit)
via 64bfa26f99b91a84f9fa241a440b6d7d5a8847ae (commit)
from
The branch, master has been updated
via 55dcf928eb6ce603c5e95a9a80856a4deb33d0c6 (commit)
via cfa4e7ec7540d1100649839a10968303189fe929 (commit)
via 25939a627f15b7a21110767d47be0f50f32d3943 (commit)
via 13bfcd5a93c47c9db8b644560a1bcc398facb136 (commit)
via
The branch, master has been updated
via a1cf12e1f69a9c1f062ca12e2981a45f9ea27d37 (commit)
from 9741cb7638d4da777aa7dfa0eb7618b26795a657 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via c6dd2c9552b79c0cf68b91cfa6aed3c399323850 (commit)
from a1cf12e1f69a9c1f062ca12e2981a45f9ea27d37 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 10833f641a33d340c03d01bf25551cd1d0d1ef63 (commit)
via 5ad756fad3f10863c5257726b119a7082cb84968 (commit)
from c6dd2c9552b79c0cf68b91cfa6aed3c399323850 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via d0c9d5ed8eeafe316856ccb654d2297f0078cbb5 (commit)
via df65fc02fb6684d86271c89a21f297fd29b8539c (commit)
from 10833f641a33d340c03d01bf25551cd1d0d1ef63 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 97338168e8c7719d6460dc11ae489ecbb218b31d (commit)
from d0c9d5ed8eeafe316856ccb654d2297f0078cbb5 (commit)
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The branch, master has been updated
via 733fa19bc160b3aecfa15e0475042388e853969d (commit)
via bbc0a56da59df8b7cd6f19f99cfaac9c3909779f (commit)
via 5da0a7e1a1ea4a56d08ca3d3e55825cfedaa (commit)
via 94183eb7e617dbfead93b9342bc85ebb27d93903 (commit)
via
The branch, master has been updated
via a8ab1e2570ac2a2e772295cd0cc46b7e60398043 (commit)
via 493166b0094b973f7ed6fa98ed66eb0ffebc1447 (commit)
via 0819e79c4fdbd937e4b9516a1ff2ed8439cc8830 (commit)
via b00518cf7a9d82e92309c66462f7049e185342c5 (commit)
from
82 matches
Mail list logo
