Hi,
I'm having permissions problems connecting to a share when the gid of
the directory shared is not the primary group of the user connecting to it.
Maybe I faced it the wrong way, but I did read (and at least thought I
understood) the 'File, directory and share access controls' section of
the h
> [...@helen samba]$ sudo mount -t cifs harriet:C /mnt/win
Since you're not specifying a username or password, you're connecting as
a Guest user.
> [...@helen Documents and Settings]$ ls tim
> ls: reading directory tim: Permission denied
Obviously Guest isn't Tim :-)
> [...@helen Documents and
> It looks like the problem is AD UID to UNIX UID mapping. The default
> TDB backend will create 'virtual' UNIX accounts on demand but I don't
> want this -- I want user 'foo' to map to the local user 'foo'. If I
> add idmap uid and idmap gid lines the users authenticate okay but the
> TDB idmap ba
Hi all,
For some reason I'm getting thousands of hanging TCP connections on our
server which appear to be caused by Samba sending print jobs to CUPS (or
I assume so as nothing else on the machine uses CUPS.)
These connections are starting to cause problems (programs monitoring
connections start b
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:01:24PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 01:43:42PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > No. Samba needs libiconv to do the utf8 <--> UCS2 translations for
> > clients.
>
> Hmm. I thought we do *that* one ourselves. I thought we need
> libiconv just fo
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
From: Jeremy Allison
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:01:24PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 01:43:42PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > > No. Samba needs libiconv to do the utf8 <--> UCS2 translations for
> > > clients.
> >
> > Hmm. I tho
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 01:43:42PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> No. Samba needs libiconv to do the utf8 <--> UCS2 translations for
> clients.
Hmm. I thought we do *that* one ourselves. I thought we need
libiconv just for the other charsets.
Volker
pgpiJ0eI4MzPp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:45:37PM +0100, theHog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am building a NAS that only has a couple of SATA disks attached (no USB, no
> CD/DVD, no NFS, no ...). Since the available space for the rootfs is limited
> (only 8 MB), I'd like to omit libiconv because this library takes 875 Kby
the desktop.ini issue can't be solved by samba. That's because the contents of the "Start Menu" are located in different places, like within your Windows profile (roaming) and the "All Users" profile (local). Because the latter is located on your PC, there's no way for samba to interfere.
Hi,
can I change the samba passwords with a java application or it is
practicable to change the two password hashes directly throug LDAP
commands?
Regards
Volker Jordan
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/option
I'm trying to think about how to setup a Samba system and would like to pick
the brains of some experts. We are looking up put a large amount of storage
~75TB in a central data center. We have some remote (ok, not remote, but
across slower links, ok if you consider several hundred clients over 1Gb
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 09:49:02PM +0100, theHog wrote:
> - Oorspronkelijk bericht -
> From: Jeremy Allison
> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 11:01:24PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 01:43:42PM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > > > No. Samba needs libiconv to do the
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 10:34 +0200, Paul te Bokkel wrote:
> Any alternatives? :D
>
We use smbwebclient.php (sourceforge project,
http://sourceforge.net/projects/smbwebclient/ ), very simple and it
works very well.
For smbclient >= 3.2 we had to make a couple of small changes as the
options for sm
Dear all
Is ist possible to join a windows7 pc to a samba 3.2.15 domain?
I tried the registry hack:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorkstation\Para
meters]
"DomainCompatibilityMode"=dword:0001
"DNSNameResolutionRequired"=dword:
And I got succesfull j
I had the same situation (Solaris 10, Sun Dir Server, Samba 3.0.33.)
I wrote an external script to change the password. Make sure the script
is owned by root and with perms 600 or 700 since it needs the LDAP super
user's password.
#vi smb.conf
...
unix password sync = yes
passwd program =
thank you for comment, but still same problem
in smb.conf
interfaces = 192.168.1.201/24
bind interfaces only = Yes
obey pam restrictions = Yes
passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://192.168.1.201
pam password change = Yes
passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u
I was wrong ...
the issue in this case was caused 100% by the line "profile acls = Yes" in
the global section rather than the profiles section, it had nothing to do
with our OpenLDAP setup (thankfully), and nothing to do with the ZFS
partitions/NFS partitions ...
moving the "profile acl" line fro
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 10:47:29PM +0200, Michael Wood wrote:
> 2009/11/2 Alex Samad :
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:14:26AM -0600, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> >> Ok, it was a shot in the dark since there was no smb.conf included.
> >
> > okay, forgot about that, I have attached now, I have bzip2 it
>
smbpassword defaults to localhost. Add it to your interfaces or use
smbpasswd -r
Paul
--
ir Paul te Bokkel
Ingenieursbureau Te Bokkel
e p...@tebokkel.com / i http://www.tebokkel.com
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:02 AM, pcinformace pcinformace <
pcinform...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I resolved part
Ok, I resolved part
smbpasswd
Old SMB password:
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the tconX on the IPC$ share. Error was :
NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED.
Failed to change password for test1
by adding
interfaces = 192.168.1.201/24, eth2
bind interfaces only = Yes
Hi,
I want, that the unix password ( stored on LDAP ) gets changed when a
user changes his samba password ( stored on LDAP ).
So I set ldap passwd sync = yes, but the unix password does not get
changed. The samba password is updated.
Smbpasswd shows this error
machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the (ano
Hi,
Can anyone confirm that Davenport, the jCIFS-based webdav gateway is
current? In other words, if I update the jCIFS jar, will Davenport be
current? Is it still 'supported' without any known errors or is it
abandoned? Any current users?
Any alternatives? :D
Paul
--
ir Paul te Bokkel
Ingenieur
22 matches
Mail list logo