Hi people.
I have 2 domains right now:
WinNT4 + Windows 2k3.
A lot of u will say, why don't u just move everything to win2k3?..
well I prefer to work with linux/Unix.
My question is this, I test the migration from NT4 to linux with
ldap, it works and is not to difficult, my problem is th
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 01:57:35AM +0100, Kacper wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a read-only fs and samba fails to start with the error message:
>
> Failed to open /var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb
>
> The file exists there but is of course read-only. Does samba need to
> write to this secret file or why doesn
I am still trying to get my Fedora 11 based Samba 3.4 share to show up on
windows My Red Hat 9.0 Samba share must be using broadcast based name
resolution because the hosts file is empty, and none of the windows clients
has a fixed IP address. Also ping shows that both the sever and the clients
can
Dear James, Dale, and ALL
Thankyou for your enlightment
Now I set things as you sugested, directories with 770 and files with 660
Case solved
Sincerely
-bino-
James Kosin wrote:
Bino,
The permissions should be 770 for directories. They need execute
privileges for directories to be able to
Hi,
I have a read-only fs and samba fails to start with the error message:
Failed to open /var/lib/samba/secrets.tdb
The file exists there but is of course read-only. Does samba need to
write to this secret file or why doesn't it want to open that file?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to th
Am Mittwoch 06 Januar 2010 22:44:40 schrieb Felix Miata:
> On 2010/01/06 16:31 (GMT-0500) Mick Mueck composed:
> > Felix Miata wrote:
> >>Answer by OS/2 user:
> >>
> >>Actually, Samba is server only. Client for using Samba shares has been
> >> called CIFS (on Linux at least; previously SMB) for a c
On 2010/01/06 16:31 (GMT-0500) Mick Mueck composed:
> Felix Miata wrote:
>>Answer by OS/2 user:
>>Actually, Samba is server only. Client for using Samba shares has been called
>>CIFS (on Linux at least; previously SMB) for a couple of years or more. Have
>>you looked for a precompiled and/or upd
Thanks Felix - I'll try searching in the SMB/CIFS universe for the latest Mac
OS X compatible version.
On Wednesday, January 06, 2010, at 02:09PM, "Felix Miata"
wrote:
>On 2010/01/06 12:44 (GMT-0500) Mick Mueck composed:
>
>> I'm a Mac user working in a company that is PC and Linux dominated.
Bino,
The permissions should be 770 for directories. They need execute
privileges for directories to be able to get access to the directories.
You should be able to set the files for 660 though I don't believe it
will keep windows from executing a file.
With 'force' before 'create mask' or 'dire
Hi,
Using Solaris 9 and Samba 3.0.35 with below configuration.
[global]
workgroup = AMERICAS
server string =
security = SERVER
password server = XX,XXxx
username map = /apps/samba/users.map
lanman auth = No
ntlm auth = N
On 2010/01/06 12:44 (GMT-0500) Mick Mueck composed:
> I'm a Mac user working in a company that is PC and Linux dominated. I have a
> Mac at work and I funnel everything through it. I mount my Linux box onto my
> Mac using Samba, and navigate it's filesystem through the Finder and run
> programs
On 01/05/2010 10:00 PM, Bino Oetomo wrote:
Dear Brian and all
Thankyou for your fast enlightment
Brian H. Nelson wrote:
Bino Oetomo wrote:
And ... voila ... the user can access (read-write) into the shares ...
But it'll means that the user can also "execute" somethings inside
directory ... r
Hi,
I'm a Mac user working in a company that is PC and Linux dominated. I have a
Mac at work and I funnel everything through it. I mount my Linux box onto my
Mac using Samba, and navigate it's filesystem through the Finder and run
programs on it while displaying all the X-windows back to my Mac
Le 23/12/2009 18:23, Ryan Suarez a écrit :
Hi,
Still working this out with the vendor.
Could you guys try this driver with the Xerox 7xxx model and let me know
if it plays nicer with samba?
http://www.support.xerox.com/go/getfile.asp?Xlang=fr_FR&XCntry=FRA&objid=55425&EULA=1&prodID=WC7228_WC72
14 matches
Mail list logo
