Quoting Rob Shinn (mor...@tuxedo.darktech.org):
> I've used both and the packages themselves are basically the same.
> A particular Ubuntu stable release package of Samba is more likely
> to be more current than the Debian stable release, but that's a
> result of policy differences, not technical
On 01/15/2010 10:40 AM, Peter Olcott wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:42 AM, John H Terpstra wrote:
>
>> On 01/15/2010 07:54 AM, Peter Olcott wrote:
>>> Is the only option for responding to posts in this group to receive ALL
>> of
>>> the messages posted in this group by email?
>>
>> 1) Subscri
I've made some pseudo progress .. I deleted my DNS domain name from my
client -- after that, I was able to get a message (Welcome to Bliss Domain) -- followed by 'Domain join failed, you will not be in the Domain. Reboot now to activate your new domain name.
Upon reboot, it thinks I am in Bl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This didnt seem to help.
As a side, note, i've also tried it without the Novell client. This
didnt help either.
Thanks just the same for the response.
On 01/15/2010 03:48 PM, Gerald Carter wrote:
> Nathan Lager wrote:
>> Afternoon!
>> I have a sa
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 03:46:16PM -0500, Rob Shinn wrote:
> That's just silly. I use Ubuntu on my desktops and servers mostly
> because I prefer the extra fit-and-polish it has to Debian. But I've
> used both and the packages themselves are basically the same. A
> particular Ubuntu stable
Nathan Lager wrote:
> Afternoon!
> I have a samba server, which shares out an NFS mounted share. It seems
> that everything works rather well, except that i get some lag when
> modifying a file. If i share a directory which is local to the samba
> server, no lag, everything works perfectly. Howe
Michael Lueck wrote:
When Etch came out, the Samba packages were so bad that I ended up
trying Ubuntu (7.04). It worked great!
That's just silly. I use Ubuntu on my desktops and servers mostly
because I prefer the extra fit-and-polish it has to Debian. But I've
used both and the packages th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Afternoon!
I have a samba server, which shares out an NFS mounted share. It seems
that everything works rather well, except that i get some lag when
modifying a file. If i share a directory which is local to the samba
server, no lag, everything works
I got past this error by including linux/uio.h in the .c file but not
sure that is where the
header file should be included.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Shirish Pargaonkar
wrote:
> Not sure if this is a known error during samba4 source code compilation
> and how to fix it (which file has st
Not sure if this is a known error during samba4 source code compilation
and how to fix it (which file has struct iovec defined and where to include it)
Compiling ../libcli/util/tstream.c
../libcli/util/tstream.c:39: error: field âtmp_vectorâ has incomplete type
The following command failed:
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 8:42 AM, John H Terpstra wrote:
> On 01/15/2010 07:54 AM, Peter Olcott wrote:
> > Is the only option for responding to posts in this group to receive ALL
> of
> > the messages posted in this group by email?
>
> 1) Subscribers to the samba mailing list can control whether o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 11:46:38 +0100
From: Guillaume Rousse
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Feedback to getting to samba 4 blog
Le 14/01/2010 15:07, Andreas Moroder a écrit :
Hello,
I
2010/1/15 Timothy Murphy :
> John H Terpstra wrote:
>
>> 7) There have been (and possibly still are) subscribers who elect not to
>> receive postings to the mailing list.
>>
>> 8) Subscribers who elect not to receive postings CAN post to the list.
>
> I imagine there are a large number of subscribe
Maybe try using Administrator as the name - I think you want to use an
account on the domain that has rights to add machines to the domain,
rather than the local root account.
YOu may also be able to precreate the machine account on NT4.And are
you running the latest NT4 patch (6a.)Wi
John H Terpstra wrote:
> 7) There have been (and possibly still are) subscribers who elect not to
> receive postings to the mailing list.
>
> 8) Subscribers who elect not to receive postings CAN post to the list.
I imagine there are a large number of subscribers who like me
read postings through
Also I believe there is an option to receive a daily digest, rather than in
real time, at least there used to be...
- Original Message -
> From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org
> To: Peter Olcott , John H Terpstra
> Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 4:37:21 PM GM
On 01/15/2010 07:54 AM, Peter Olcott wrote:
> Is the only option for responding to posts in this group to receive ALL of
> the messages posted in this group by email?
1) Subscribers to the samba mailing list can control whether or not they
receive messages that are posted to the list. This is an o
Hallo, Peter,
Du meintest am 15.01.10:
> Is the only option for responding to posts in this group to receive
> ALL of the messages posted in this group by email?
Yes - that's the major principle of mailing lists.
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL an
Is the only option for responding to posts in this group to receive ALL of
the messages posted in this group by email?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
The similarities are much bigger than their differences. Yes there are pros &
cons to both Debian & Ubuntu. For example do you prefer a 2 year release cycle
or a 6 month release cycle. I use both distributions in different
circumstances. It is thanks to everyone who has put in an effort to Debi
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:33:35AM -0200, Fabio Bonilha wrote:
> Volker,
>
> Check the message I sent you in private.
Arrived, but sillily busy. I'll try to look at it over the
weekend.
Volker
pgpqmnQ9aiDk5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following UR
Volker,
Check the message I sent you in private.
Regards.
Volker Lendecke escreveu:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 04:27:27PM -0200, Fabio Bonilha wrote:
The level 10 debug is more like a monster, maybe it's easier if you tell
what I should look for.
It should shrink a lot with bzip2 -9. Feel
samba eXPerience 2010 - call for papers
---
From May 3rd to 7th 2010 developers and users will meet again in
Goettingen, Germany at the ninth international Samba conference, the
"samba eXPerience 2010".
The sambaXP is the leading event with focus on the most im
Quoting Michael Lueck (mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com):
> Peter Olcott wrote:
> >I decided to try
> >Ubuntu. After intallation it took only five minutes of editing the smb.conf
> >file to make my share fully operational.
>
> :-)
>
> I had been hearing good things about Ubuntu, however I was firmly i
Le 14/01/2010 15:07, Andreas Moroder a écrit :
Hello,
I did not find a way tu put my opinion to the blog so I answer here. I
hope this is ok.
We ( a public hospital ) are one of the few that have no AD, because I
wanted to wait that samba has this functionality.
Every solution that give us the
On 2010-01-14 at 08:28 +0100 Albrecht Dreß sent off:
>
> after an upgrade of my Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit box to a self-compiled samba 3.4.3
> (Lenny backport dpkg), I see strange error messages in my OpenLDAP log:
>
> slapd[3388]: do_search: invalid dn
> (sambaDomainName=,sambaDomainName=,cn=<...>,dc
On Donnerstag, 14. Januar 2010 wrote Michael Wood:
> 2010/1/14 Albrecht Dreß :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > after an upgrade of my Ubuntu 8.04 64-bit box to a self-compiled
> > samba 3.4.3 (Lenny backport dpkg), I see strange error messages in
> > my OpenLDAP log:
> >
> > slapd[3388]: do_search: invalid dn
I am out of the office until 17-01-2010.
I will reply to emails when I return. please contact my manager for any
issues.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: [Samba] Given up
on Fedora Ubuntu is 1000-folder simpler" sent on 15/1/10 9:16:15.
This is the only notification y
Quoting Natxo Asenjo :
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Peter Olcott wrote:
I spent several days (at least 20 hours) tying to get Fedora 11 Samba server
going. I consulted every resource that I knew including this list. When I
discovered that Fedora 11 Samba could be browsed immediately upon
29 matches
Mail list logo
