Re: [Samba] Spurious data in file retrieved from Windows share via Samba

2010-05-21 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Robert, Du meintest am 21.05.10: > I am using Samba to read a file on a Windows share from Linux. > Linux version is Ubuntu 9.04 (I think). Not sure about the Samba > version (sorry, can't check it now); it's whatever was packaged with > Ubuntu. Windows version is Windows Server 2003 SP 2.

Re: [Samba] Moving to another idmap backend

2010-05-21 Thread Mike Leone
On 05/21/2010 06:32 PM, Nick Irvine wrote: Hi all, I've got winbind up and running on two servers, but the UID/GIDs don't match up. After educating myself a little, I think I would like to use the idmap_rid backend. I have set up the smb.conf's accordingly, but after restarting samba/winbind ser

[Samba] Moving to another idmap backend

2010-05-21 Thread Nick Irvine
Hi all, I've got winbind up and running on two servers, but the UID/GIDs don't match up. After educating myself a little, I think I would like to use the idmap_rid backend. I have set up the smb.conf's accordingly, but after restarting samba/winbind services, my UIDs and GIDs are still the

Re: [Samba] Spurious data in file retrieved from Windows share via Samba

2010-05-21 Thread Robert Dodier
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Michael Wood wrote: > Ah, so you're using smbmount or mount.cifs or something like that to > get access to the Windows share? Yes, I'm using mount -t cifs and then reading the files from within the Linux file system. > Presumably you can get logs on the Linux si

Re: [Samba] Spurious data in file retrieved from Windows share via Samba

2010-05-21 Thread Michael Wood
On 21 May 2010 22:48, Robert Dodier wrote: > Hello, > > I am using Samba to read a file on a Windows share from Linux. > Linux version is Ubuntu 9.04 (I think). Not sure about the Samba > version (sorry, can't check it now); it's whatever was packaged with > Ubuntu. Windows version is Windows Serv

Re: [Samba] Spurious data in file retrieved from Windows share via Samba

2010-05-21 Thread Robert Dodier
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:48:16PM -0600, Robert Dodier wrote: >> I have no power to change anything on the Windows side and >> probably no ability to ask for logs or other debugging info. > > Then to be honest it's going to be really diffi

Re: [Samba] Spurious data in file retrieved from Windows share via Samba

2010-05-21 Thread Jeremy Allison
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 02:48:16PM -0600, Robert Dodier wrote: > I have no power to change anything on the Windows side and > probably no ability to ask for logs or other debugging info. Then to be honest it's going to be really difficult to help you. Getting logs is a basic requirement. Jeremy.

[Samba] Spurious data in file retrieved from Windows share via Samba

2010-05-21 Thread Robert Dodier
Hello, I am using Samba to read a file on a Windows share from Linux. Linux version is Ubuntu 9.04 (I think). Not sure about the Samba version (sorry, can't check it now); it's whatever was packaged with Ubuntu. Windows version is Windows Server 2003 SP 2. Sometimes the file contains obviously sp

[Samba] ANNOUNCE: cifs-utils release 4.5 available for download

2010-05-21 Thread Jeff Layton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The rate of incoming patches has been pretty low lately, so it's probably a good time to do a new stable release and get what's queued up into people's hands... This release consists of a couple of bugfixes and some (hopefully) non-user-visible cleanu

Re: [Samba] Samba + CUPS

2010-05-21 Thread Nick Couchman
> Ricoh-Aficio_MP_C4500 supports postscript and has a manufacture ppd so there > are no issues like that here > > http://www.openprinting.org/printer/Ricoh/Ricoh-Aficio_MP_C4500 > Yes, and I actually have the PPD installed for the MP C6501SP that I'm using. However, the PPD doesn't seem to inc

Re: [Samba] Samba + CUPS

2010-05-21 Thread Damien J Dye
Ricoh-Aficio_MP_C4500 supports postscript and has a manufacture ppd so there are no issues like that here http://www.openprinting.org/printer/Ricoh/Ricoh-Aficio_MP_C4500 the Canon imageRunner also has supported drivers. the whole point of using CUPS is to get rid of the broken drivers in the fir

Re: [Samba] net ads dns register

2010-05-21 Thread Khaled Blah
D'oh! I was quite stupid for not seeing this, so thx a lot Jim! Khaled 2010/5/21 Jim McDonough : > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Khaled Blah > wrote: >> I would like to know whether it is possible to select (a) specific >> IP(s) for a "net ads dns register" call. The reason for my question i

Re: [Samba] unable to join to a Samba4 domain

2010-05-21 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Am 21.05.2010 06:25, Andrew Bartlett wrote: When you provisioned samba4 it generated sample bind and zone config for that dc, have a look at samba_install_dir/private/dns/samba4.my.domain.zone which includes all of the dns records for that zone and see which ones you are missing Indeed, if you

Re: [Samba] Samba + CUPS

2010-05-21 Thread Ryan Suarez
Nick Couchman wrote: On 2010/05/20 at 13:43, Damien J Dye wrote: Why are you not using the cups printer drivers in the cups enviroment there are both x64 and i386 versions and gets round the issues with broken drivers and allows cups features to be passed to windows. There are

Re: [Samba] Samba + CUPS

2010-05-21 Thread Nick Couchman
> Which driver are you referring to? Does the driver not have options to > disable printer communication? It's a driver for a Ricoh Aficio MP C6501SP. No, there is no option to disable bi-directional printer communication. My Canon imageRunner drivers do have this option, and even let you sp

Re: [Samba] Samba + CUPS

2010-05-21 Thread Ryan Suarez
Nick Couchman wrote On to my next question. I'm in an enterprise environment where I'm using CUPS + Samba to serve out printers to my entire organization. Most of these printers are network-attached, and some of the more recent drivers expect to be able to communicate directly with the print

Re: [Samba] samba 3.5.3 time-stamping issue

2010-05-21 Thread Oliver Freyd
This happens on a amd64 machine, running debian lenny on top of debian etch (with xen-3.0.3). The virtual machine that runs samba-3.5.3 runs linux kernel 2.6.18. Linux samba-fs1a 2.6.18-6-xen-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Aug 21 16:46:08 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux On another machine I tried debian lenny, ke

[Samba] Mapped drive behaviour after Windows reboot

2010-05-21 Thread Graham Keeling
Hello, I was previously using samba-3.3.3 on my linux machine. I could 'map a drive' from a Windows XP machine to access files on the linux machine. If I rebooted the Windows machine, and tried to access the share again by clicking on the mapped drive icon, I would be denied, but I would be give

Re: [Samba] Drive becomes unusable with "The group name could not be found"

2010-05-21 Thread Mike A. Leonetti
Gentoo Linux. Mike A. Leonetti As warm as green tea On 05/20/10 16:54, Gaiseric Vandal wrote: > What OS? > > Solaris has 16 group limit. > > On 05/20/2010 02:43 PM, Mike A. Leonetti wrote: >> Out of nowhere the share "neil share" disappeared for one user and the >> user got the error "The group n

[Samba] Problems with accessing samba share in Windows 2008R2 domain

2010-05-21 Thread russell
Hi, After upgrading the Windows DCs from Windows 2003R2 to Windows 2008R, the domain functional level was raised from Windows 2000 to Windows 2008R2. As a consequence of this action, I found that a Application Management GPO no longer worked pushing applications to the companies desktops. A

Re: [Samba] Samba4 upgradeprovision and sysvol permissions error

2010-05-21 Thread tms3
SNIP What should be the permissions on sysvol directory? And where is he place where they are stored? I did not see this behaviour in the previous build, befor running upgradeprovision upgradeprovision has fixed the ACLs in your directory, but not those on disk. A big update to upgradepro

Re: [Samba] Samba4 upgradeprovision and sysvol permissions error

2010-05-21 Thread Andrew Bartlett
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 19:29 +0100, Lukasz Zalewski wrote: > Hi! > I have recently upgraded samba4 to the latest GIT build. > I have run upgradeprovision according to upgrading-samba4.txt instructions. > All seems to be well, but when i try to access Group Policy Objects from > gpmc utility on win

Re: [Samba] samba and bind9 problem

2010-05-21 Thread Michael Wood
On 21 May 2010 00:16, Aleksandar Nasuovski wrote: > I followed the manual and got 3 problems Is this with Samba4? > 1. When i start samba i got error: > > ../dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:249: Failed DNS update - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT Maybe you have firewall issues? > 2. When i join some computer bind9

Re: [Samba] net ads dns register

2010-05-21 Thread Jim McDonough
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Khaled Blah wrote: > I would like to know whether it is possible to select (a) specific > IP(s) for a "net ads dns register" call. The reason for my question is > that we have setups with several interfaces, a few of which are > "internal" interfaces but technicall