The hashes stored are not NTLMv1 or v2, that's the protocol
that uses the hashes. The stored hashes are MD4. So you don't
need to convert any hashes in LDAP to go to NTLMv2 protocol
security.
Jeremy.
Thank you Jeremy ... that makes things much easier :)
regards
martin
--
To unsubscribe f
SNIP
mich...@carter ~ $ smbclient //carter/homes/michael
Yep. You need to use the home path stuff.
Alternatively you could, just to make it very easy
#Share for michael
[MICHEAL]
path = /samba/michael (etc.)
#Share for amy
[AMY]
path = /samba/amy (etc.)
Then the mount from cifs, or wi
To be clear, all of my references to UNIX user account pertain to the user
accounts on the Samba server host, not Gentoo accounts on the client PCs.
Stan Hoeppner put forth on 7/8/2010 9:07 PM:
> Michael Sullivan put forth on 7/8/2010 2:41 PM:
>
>> [homes]
>> path=/samba/michael
>> valid users=mi
Michael Sullivan put forth on 7/8/2010 2:41 PM:
> [homes]
> path=/samba/michael
> valid users=michael
> writable=yes
>
> path=/samba/amy
> valid users=amy
> writeable=yes
I'd suggest you set the UNIX HOME variable to match these non standard home
paths. For instance, the default UNIX home dir i
Luke Hamilton put forth on 7/8/2010 7:31 PM:
> I have a setup of Ubuntu 8.04 running Samba 3.0.28a. Connected to our
> network I
> have a buffalo linkstation acting as Network Attached Storage (NAS), which I
> have successfully mounted on the local file system.
>
> Using smbcquotas I believe I
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 18:01 -0700, t...@tms3.com wrote:
> Erm, the [homes] isn't an outline heading. It is a share name. It is
> unique, and has a unique path. You probably want to use an auto login
> for homes such that a user connects to
>
> \\sever\share\%U
>
> where the share in smb.conf
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:32:32AM +1000, Abe Lau wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I was having problem with the tdbsam backend in which a particular user
> got
> > listed twice with pdbedit.
> > (http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg10911
My wife and I each have our own workstation dual-booting WinXP and
Gentoo Linux. We also have a third which runs Gentoo all the time. I
wanted to set up samba on the third box and provide some extra storage
space for both our Windows installs. It worked for a few days, then
all
of a sudd
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Gaiseric Vandal
wrote:
> On 07/08/2010 05:43 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:32:32AM +1000, Abe Lau wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I was having problem with the tdbsam backend in which a particular user
>>> got
>>> listed twice with pdbedit.
>>>
My wife and I each have our own workstation dual-booting WinXP and
Gentoo Linux. We also have a third which runs Gentoo all the time. I
wanted to set up samba on the third box and provide some extra storage
space for both our Windows installs. It worked for a few days, then all
of a sudden it st
I have a setup of Ubuntu 8.04 running Samba 3.0.28a. Connected to our network
I
have a buffalo linkstation acting as Network Attached Storage (NAS), which I
have successfully mounted on the local file system.
Using smbcquotas I believe I can set up a quota for each user on the NAS. To
get st
On 07/08/2010 05:43 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:32:32AM +1000, Abe Lau wrote:
Hi,
I was having problem with the tdbsam backend in which a particular user got
listed twice with pdbedit.
(http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg109110.html)
Without much h
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:32:32AM +1000, Abe Lau wrote:
> Hi,
> I was having problem with the tdbsam backend in which a particular user got
> listed twice with pdbedit.
> (http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg109110.html)
>
> Without much hope in fixing it, I am planning to re-gen
Apparently this didn't/doesn't build on FreeBSD by default...or is it
"doesn't build at all".
If it is buildable, what should I do to build it, as without it...see
wiki:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/Winbind
Cheers,
TMS III
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following UR
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 01:19:20PM +0200, Martin Hochreiter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We have a Samba 3.5.4 PDC with openldap database and
> we are using currently ntlm (V1)
>
> We want to use ntlmV2 and I want to know what is necessary
> to do that -
> is it just the change of the conf options or do we ha
On 07/08/2010 03:10 PM, Gregory A. Cain wrote:
Exactly. I checked 4 or 5 other users - no problems. Also did a
spot-check of files belonging to other users in Windows Explorer. It
appears this is the only user with the problem.
I checked for duplicate UID's and found none. Using ls -l on
Yes, it returns the correct SID.
On 7/8/2010 12:33 PM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
What does "pdbedit -Lv theuser" show? It should show the user's SID.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On 07/08/2010 03:10 PM, Gregory A. Cain wrote:
Exactly. I checked 4 or 5 other users - no problems. Also did a
spot-check of files belonging to other users in Windows Explorer. It
appears this is the only user with the problem.
I checked for duplicate UID's and found none. Using ls -l on t
Exactly. I checked 4 or 5 other users - no problems. Also did a
spot-check of files belonging to other users in Windows Explorer. It
appears this is the only user with the problem.
I checked for duplicate UID's and found none. Using ls -l on the server
returns the correct user name and UID
--- Original message ---
Subject: Re: [Samba] File owner SID instead of name showing for one
user
From: Gregory A. Cain
To:
Date: Thursday, 08/07/2010 11:38 AM
Thank you -
wbinfo -s (user sid) returns "Could not lookup sid (user sid)"
But all other SID lookups are good (well at least
Also make sure that SID returned by "wbinfo -n DOMAIN\name" matches
the
name returned by"wbinfo -s SID" command.
Yeah...but that's a real puzzler, isn't it? Why the is the
nsswitch/winbindd process getting a SID as a value for uid? I've
seen it briefly when some process is laggin
This occurs when Windows cannot find a user name for the SID. Identify
which user is the real owner and change the Owner of the file to the
real owner. If the owner actually does exist then it's probably missing
the name attribute.
On 08/07/10 01:56 PM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Also make sure t
Thank you -
wbinfo -s (user sid) returns "Could not lookup sid (user sid)"
How do I fix this?
Thanks again.
On 7/8/2010 10:56 AM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Also make sure that SID returned by "wbinfo -n DOMAIN\name" matches the
name returned by "wbinfo -s SID" command.
--
To unsubscribe from
Also make sure that SID returned by "wbinfo -n DOMAIN\name" matches the
name returned by"wbinfo -s SID" command.
On 07/08/2010 01:45 PM, t...@tms3.com wrote:
Hello,
I recently migrated all data and user accounts from our old Samba file
server to a new (Samba 3.4.0 on Unbuntu 9.10) one
Hello,
I recently migrated all data and user accounts from our old Samba file
server to a new (Samba 3.4.0 on Unbuntu 9.10) one. Everything is
working
fine except that there is one user whose SID is showing in the "Owner"
column of Windows Explorer instead of the user name.
It's not a big
Hello,
I recently migrated all data and user accounts from our old Samba file
server to a new (Samba 3.4.0 on Unbuntu 9.10) one. Everything is working
fine except that there is one user whose SID is showing in the "Owner"
column of Windows Explorer instead of the user name.
It's not a big pr
Has anyone got any ideia about my issue, I'm trying to open a share in Linux
from a desktop Windows, but stay asking the login/passwd.
I'm using smbd 3.4.8 with winbind and mit kerberos, joining in AD Windows
2008 Server.
[2010/07/08 13:51:34, 5] auth/auth_util.c:208(make_user_info_map)
Mapping
Hi!
We have a Samba 3.5.4 PDC with openldap database and
we are using currently ntlm (V1)
We want to use ntlmV2 and I want to know what is necessary
to do that -
is it just the change of the conf options or do we have to convert
the ldap - stored ntlm (V1) hashes to ntlmV2 before we can use it?
Hallo, Dadoo,
Du meintest am 08.07.10:
>> #testparm -v | grep "acl "
>>
>> acl compatibility = auto
>> acl check permissions = Yes
>> acl group control = No
>> acl map full control = Yes
>> force unknown acl user = No
>> nt acl support = Yes
>>
Hi all,
I've run into a problem regarding the DNS update while joining a
domain. The joining of the domain worked but the domain update
(enabled with --with-dnsupdate) did not. I could solve the issue by
compiling Samba with older Kerberos libs (1.6.3). I know that Kerberos
1.8 disables DES by def
On Sun, 04 Jul 2010 20:26:47 -0400, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
> It works for me - Solaris 10, ZFS file system, configured as a PDC or
> BDC
>
> #testparm -v | grep "acl "
>
> acl compatibility = auto
> acl check permissions = Yes
> acl group control = No
> acl map
On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 22:30:43 -0700, tms3 wrote:
>> Is this an OS setting or a Samba setting?
>
> File system/OS.
Yes, the filesystem supports ACLs. If it helps any, this is the output
from "getfacl":
# owner: \134
# group: \134mis
user::rwx
user:\134:rwx
user:\134administr
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:32:00 -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
> ACLs can sometimes be turned on or off on a file system as a mount
> option. Other times it's inherent in the system. It may even be a
> format-time option.
Oh, if you're asking whether or not the filesystem itself supports ACLs,
yes, it doe
33 matches
Mail list logo
