Example
On Server1
[global]
>workgroup = GROUP1
>netbios name = GROUP1_SRV
>domain master = yes
>local master = yes
>preferred master = yes
>os level = 65
>smb ports = 139
>
OK, but what of the client PC's in Group2. Do I assign them the Group1
server as their WINS server, or do they now operate without WINS?
Tawanda
Daniel Müller wrote:
Example
On Server1
[global]
workgroup = GROUP1
netbios name = GROUP1_SRV
doma
Yes Group1 Server ist the wins for all
---
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 Tübingen
Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
eMail: muel...@tropenklinik.de
Internet: www.tropenklinik.de
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 05:20:50PM +0200, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> Right. Then it's a bug. You might contact your RPM provider
> for support of this old Samba version.
Is Samba 3.3.8 also too old? It suffers from the same problem.
--
Lukáš Hejtmánek
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the fo
Hello,
I am running Samba 3.0.33-3.28.el5 configured like this:
[global]
workgroup = mywrk
realm = myrealm
security = ads
name resolve order = lmhosts host bcast
allow trusted domains = no
Release Announcements
-
This is the first preview release of Samba 3.6. This is *not*
intended for production environments and is designed for testing
purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting
system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/.
Major enhanceme
Hello
I waited 15mn in case it was due to some browsing issue, but the
directory I shared on a Ubuntu server still doesn't show up in the XP
Net'hood, with no error when starting smbd or in
/var/log/samba/log.smbd.
Here's the smb.conf I wrote:
===
# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
[globa
On 07/28/2010 07:28 AM, Gilles wrote:
I waited 15mn in case it was due to some browsing issue, but the
directory I shared on a Ubuntu server still doesn't show up in the XP
Net'hood, with no error when starting smbd or in
/var/log/samba/log.smbd.
Are you expecting it to appear in the "My Netw
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:28:57 +0200, Gilles
wrote:
>Here's the smb.conf I wrote:
Also tried this, running "restart smbd" after each addition, to no
avail:
===
# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
[global]
workgroup = WORKGROUP
server string = Samba Server %v
guest account = nobody
dns proxy = no
win
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:42:34 -0500, Chris Gonnerman
wrote:
>Go to Start, Run, and enter
>
>\\name-of-server\share
>
>then hit OK. Of course, you should substitute the actual name of the
>server. If it opens a window (with whatever is in /srv/samba visible in
>it), you're good.
>
>If that doesn
I installed samba4 alfa10.
have 84 users connected:
[r...@dc1 ~]# netstat -na | grep -c 445
84
And +10 samba daemons running
[r...@dc1 ~]# ps -A | grep -c samba
94
Question : Is this OK? Is this normal behavior ?
Is it 10 with no users , and then 1 daemon per user connected ?
--
To unsubscribe
My apologies...
Here is a working copy as an attachment. I will also fix the blog post I
have up about it.
Keep in mind it does require a couple of tools installed to function
properly.
i.e.
wbinfo
ldapsearch
ldapmodify
Also a note on how it works. It uses wbinfo to detect any account in
a
Can't even figure this one out.
zaphod# ./net vampire tms3.com -Uadministrator --realm=tms3.com
dos charset 'CP850' unavailable - using ASCII
Password for [TMS3.COM\administrator]:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py",
l
Gilles ha scritto:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:42:34 -0500, Chris Gonnerman
wrote:
Go to Start, Run, and enter
\\name-of-server\share
then hit OK. Of course, you should substitute the actual name of the
server. If it opens a window (with whatever is in /srv/samba visible in
it), you're good.
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Konstantin Pobudzey <5836...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I installed samba4 alfa10.
>
> have 84 users connected:
> [r...@dc1 ~]# netstat -na | grep -c 445
> 84
>
> And +10 samba daemons running
> [r...@dc1 ~]# ps -A | grep -c samba
> 94
>
> Question : Is this OK? Is this n
В сообщении от 28 июля 2010 10:15:25 автор k.maksimov написал:
> Anton wrote:
> > On 28 July 2010 01:45, k.maksimov wrote:
> >> I have two networks: 192.168.1.0 with netmask 255.255.255.0 and
> >> 172.16.0.0 with netmask 255.255.254.0, when I join in domain in first
> >> network hostname registere
- Messaggio originale -
> GDM not support this feature:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/114620
>
> if you want, you can hack gdm)
This sounds strange, because Googling around I found some infos about GDM
allowing password change...
I don't know if this could be a pr
Alexander R. Fahrutdinov wrote:
В сообщении от 28 июля 2010 10:15:25 автор k.maksimov написал:
Anton wrote:
On 28 July 2010 01:45, k.maksimov wrote:
I have two networks: 192.168.1.0 with netmask 255.255.255.0 and
172.16.0.0 with netmask 255.255.254.0, when I join in domain in f
Gilles Ganault ha scritto:
At 15:16 28/07/2010, you wrote:
Try pinging the ubuntu server via ip address. If that works, then try
to connect to the share by using the ip address instead of the
hostname, e.g.:
\\ip-addr-of-server\share
Thanks for the help. I can connect through its IP address
Actually I was just about to start using it. Guess I shouldn't?
I'm looking for a solution to integrate an existing linux environment
into a Windows AD environment. I already added all rc2307 info on the
AD server. Now I need a way for the linux systems to fetch the
username, uid, gif, shell an
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 17:18 +0200, Nico De Ranter wrote:
> Actually I was just about to start using it. Guess I shouldn't?
>
> I'm looking for a solution to integrate an existing linux environment
> into a Windows AD environment. I already added all rc2307 info on the
> AD server. Now I need a w
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:03:43 +0200, Marcello Romani
wrote:
>My servers are pure debian, so no I don't know of Ubuntu specific tweaks.
>I'd try to enable wins in samba and raise its os level (though it should
>already be higher than xp), but it could also be that xp refuses to
>revert to netbios
Hi Nico,
Nico De Ranter wrote:
>
> Actually I was just about to start using it. Guess I shouldn't?
>
> I'm looking for a solution to integrate an existing linux environment
> into a Windows AD environment. I already added all rc2307 info on the
> AD server. Now I need a way for the linux syste
I believe testparm will skip any attribute with default values.
Nico
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 17:38 +0200, Gilles wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:03:43 +0200, Marcello Romani
> wrote:
> >My servers are pure debian, so no I don't know of Ubuntu specific tweaks.
> >I'd try to enable wins in samba an
I am trying to see if Hyper-V 2008 R2 Failover Clustering will work
with Samba 4 as the Active Directory server. Have installed Samba 4
(version alpha12) on CentOS 5.4.
Anybody else tried this before? Please share your experiences here.
Thanks,
Ajay
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:44:49 +0200, Nico De Ranter
wrote:
>I believe testparm will skip any attribute with default values.
Thanks for the tip. That's not the cause of the issue then :-/
At this point, I can finally get XP to show shared folders if I first
try to connect to them blindly through R
Hi,
I'm trying to integrate an existing linux environment with a Windows AD
environment. All my users are already in AD with valid rfc2307
attributes defined so I need a way to authenticate my users using
username, uid, gid, shell and homedirectory from AD. I've been using
Kerberos+LDAPs before
Hi again.
I've realized exactly now that my whole system has freak date/time
information on my shares:
For example: 01/03/
In Linux the date/times are ok, but in the Windows point of view all the
files are wrong.
I'm using Samba 3.0.37 with OpenLDAP as my PDC.
The date/time of the server
I have a Debian machine running Unstable acting as a samba server. The
server was installed a few days ago after a reinstall of the OS. The
older installation's samba configs were backed up and restored after
installation.
The Samba shares are accessible if I access them from a Windows 7
cl
Thanks. It worked.
Tawanda
Daniel Müller wrote:
Yes Group1 Server ist the wins for all
---
EDV Daniel Müller
Leitung EDV
Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus
Paul-Lechler-Str. 24
72076 Tübingen
Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499
eMail: muel.
> Can you be more specific in what it did not do?
It isn't so much what it did not do, but what it was able to do; it worked.
RFC 4757 specifies a message type (key usage) number of 8 should be used
for a TGS-REP response with an authenticator subkey. However, SAMBA and
Windows use 9. I would l
Hi,
Actually I am using the Backend Idmap_AD. I thought Idmap_adex is still under
heavy development.
Tobias
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Tobias Mucke
LFK-Lenkflugkörpersysteme GmbH
Serverpool, FCI4
Landshuter Straße 26, 85716 Unterschleißheim, GERMANY
Phone: +49 89 3179 8438
Fax: +49 89 3179 89
Quoting Gilles (gilles.gana...@free.fr):
> Also tried this, running "restart smbd" after each addition, to no
> avail:
You apparently have a *browsing* problem, so it's likely that nmbd is
more the problem.
> ===
> # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
> [global]
> workgroup = WORKGROUP
> server stri
В сообщении от 28 июля 2010 18:10:29 автор k.maksimov написал:
> Alexander R. Fahrutdinov wrote:
> > В сообщении от 28 июля 2010 10:15:25 автор k.maksimov написал:
> >> Anton wrote:
> >>> On 28 July 2010 01:45, k.maksimov wrote:
> I have two networks: 192.168.1.0 with netmask 255.255.255.0 an
Hello all,
I have a Samba 3.5 server running in an AD domain and domain users can
access nonpublic shares with their credentials. Good since this is what I
want.
However accidentally I found that local users (of the server itself) could
also access nonpublic shares with their credentials. Is this
Lorenzo Milesi wrote:
- Messaggio originale -
GDM not support this feature:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/114620
if you want, you can hack gdm)
This sounds strange, because Googling around I found some infos about GDM
allowing password change...
I don't
k.maksimov wrote:
Lorenzo Milesi wrote:
- Messaggio originale -
GDM not support this feature:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm/+bug/114620
if you want, you can hack gdm)
This sounds strange, because Googling around I found some infos about
GDM allowing password c
Gilles ha scritto:
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:44:49 +0200, Nico De Ranter
wrote:
I believe testparm will skip any attribute with default values.
Thanks for the tip. That's not the cause of the issue then :-/
At this point, I can finally get XP to show shared folders if I first
try to connect to
38 matches
Mail list logo
