Am 2011-01-14 07:55, schrieb Daniel Müller:
For some reasons and tried it many times. I did not have any problems
joining windows 7 with samba 3.2.15 and up with:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\services\LanmanWorkstation\Para
meters]
DomainCompatibilityMode=dword:0001
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 04:39:07PM -0500, stan.pietkiew...@statcan.gc.ca wrote:
I managed to track down a bunch of missing include files,
and made sure they were visible via symbolic links in
/usr/include. That only generated a different set of
errors
One thing I noticed, is that the
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:35:15PM +0100, Michael Hanscho wrote:
After upgrading samba from 3.4.3 to 3.5.4 (during upgrade opensuse
11.2 to 11.3) wince3.0 client does not see any files/dirs in the
user share; The config is the same as worked with 3.4.3.
Can you send a wireshark trace of that
Hi,
I plan to update our main RedHat EL 5.6 samba server from samba 3.3.x to
3.5.x .
What I noticed as our main challenge so far, is migrating the user and
machine accounts from our old smbpasswd file to a tdbsam-.tdm fileformat.
pdbedit -i smbpasswd:/etc/samba/smbpasswd -e
Hi!
On 01/14/2011 09:13 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
Can you send a wireshark trace of that CE client trying
against Samba and running against a Windows box?
Attached:
ce-samba.pcap.gz - gzipped wireshark trace ce-samba
ce-windows-pcap - gzipped wireshark trace ce - windowsxp
Thanks a lot
Hi all,
Does anybody know if could have any conflict give to a machine the same uid
number and RID? I guess that it does not matter but I would like to be sure .
Example:
User ID: 1001
SambaSId: S-1-5-21-2019295574-2912910430-3808223165-1001
Thanks a lot
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:22:53AM +0100, Michael Hanscho wrote:
Hi!
On 01/14/2011 09:13 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
Can you send a wireshark trace of that CE client trying
against Samba and running against a Windows box?
Attached:
ce-samba.pcap - wireshark trace ce-samba
ce-windows-pcap
On 1/13/2011 12:04 PM, TAKAHASHI Motonobu wrote:
You must not set these 2 entries below:
-
DWORD RequireSignOrSeal = 0
DWORD RequireStrongKey = 0
-
Thanks, I completely overlooked this and that was the trick. All issues
resolved now and have joined my
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:55:57AM +0100, Michael Hanscho wrote:
On 01/14/2011 09:13 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
Can you send a wireshark trace of that CE client trying
against Samba and running against a Windows box?
Attached:
ce-samba.pcap.gz - gzipped wireshark trace ce-samba
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 04:44:34PM +0100, Volker Lendecke wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:55:57AM +0100, Michael Hanscho wrote:
On 01/14/2011 09:13 AM, Volker Lendecke wrote:
Can you send a wireshark trace of that CE client trying
against Samba and running against a Windows box?
I would have thought you needed to have unix machine accounts in the
passwd/shadow file. Or are they using some sore of idmap allocation?
On 01/14/2011 04:34 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT-Koordinator wrote:
Hi,
I plan to update our main RedHat EL 5.6 samba server from samba 3.3.x to
3.5.x .
What I
2011/1/14 sisu . npil...@hotmail.com:
Hi all,
Does anybody know if could have any conflict give to a machine the same uid
number and RID? I guess that it does not matter but I would like to be sure .
Example:
User ID: 1001
SambaSId: S-1-5-21-2019295574-2912910430-3808223165-1001
Okay, I've got some progress now. Have fairly decent printserver
working. I've been able to reproduce the same postive and negative
results in two physical servers and now (finaly destination) a vmware
server.
What's working:
ADS integration, this is a domain member
Printer driver
Did a git-pull and built samba4, up and running with winbind.
I have a file server, which will be access by windows. Say I have a
user named abcde (uid = 1000), under group abcde) (gid = 1000).
When I created a user with samba-too (samba-tool newuser abcde x),
it creates an account abcde
Aw, geez, forgot to mention essentials:
Samba 3.5.6
Freebsd 8.1
Cups 1.4.6
smb.conf:
[global]
log level = 6
workgroup = KRH
realm = KRH.INT
netbios aliases = freecups-2 freecups samba
server string = FreeBSD Server %v
security = ADS
On 2011-01-13 13:11:07 -0600, TAKAHASHI Motonobu said:
Windows 7 can join to Samba domain built by only Samba 3.3.2 or higher.
Look at:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2011-January/160341.html
http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2011-January/160445.html
Thank for the response, but
On 01/14/2011 02:04 PM, Wei-Tsun Sun wrote:
Did a git-pull and built samba4, up and running with winbind.
I have a file server, which will be access by windows. Say I have a
user named abcde (uid = 1000), under group abcde) (gid = 1000).
When I created a user with samba-too (samba-tool
On 15/01/2011 1:50 p.m., Taylor, Jonn wrote:
On 01/14/2011 02:04 PM, Wei-Tsun Sun wrote:
Did a git-pull and built samba4, up and running with winbind.
I have a file server, which will be access by windows. Say I have a
user named abcde (uid = 1000), under group abcde) (gid = 1000).
When I
To answer my own question/problem here in case anyone else needs to know...
Turns out I had a permission issue with where I was storing the drivers.
I had that owned by printserver:printserver, and the user I was
attempting to write with was KRH\jdown.
So... it ended up being a perms issue.
On 12/18/2010 09:02 PM, Günter Kukkukk wrote:
Am Samstag 18 Dezember 2010, 22:04:34 schrieb David C. Rankin:
Guys,
I have probably missed an announcement or overlooked something in a
changelog,
but I just want to confirm what I'm seeing is expected behavior. I run samba
in
The branch, master has been updated
via 8e02335 waf: this script does need bash
from 46a3588 waf: use PYTHONARCHDIR for installing python shared libs
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
The branch, master has been updated
via 70b4c08 s3:vfs aio_fork children do not go away
via fa07208 s3:vfs fix children cleanup in aio_fork
from 8e02335 waf: this script does need bash
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 6737231 ldb:ldb_dn.c - fix counter type in ldb_dn_minimise
from 70b4c08 s3:vfs aio_fork children do not go away
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
The branch, master has been updated
via d7af875 s3-waf: fix the build after rpc_winreg removal.
from 6737231 ldb:ldb_dn.c - fix counter type in ldb_dn_minimise
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated
via 67f35d2 s3:vfs aio_fork children do not go away
via 381aaa3 s3:vfs fix children cleanup in aio_fork
from 8b821f3 s3-build: remove RPCCLI_WINREG subsystem.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-6-test
- Log
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated
via 7028b29 s3-waf: fix the build after rpc_winreg removal.
from 67f35d2 s3:vfs aio_fork children do not go away
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-6-test
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 109cbe3 s3: Fix bug 7917: Yet another bug in chain_reply
from d7af875 s3-waf: fix the build after rpc_winreg removal.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated
via c17f3e7 s3: Fix bug 7917: Yet another bug in chain_reply
from 7028b29 s3-waf: fix the build after rpc_winreg removal.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-6-test
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 39eea5c s4:samldb LDB module - fix userAccountControl handling
from 109cbe3 s3: Fix bug 7917: Yet another bug in chain_reply
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via a87b2f9 s4:urgent_replication.py - remove a now superflous RELAX
control
from 39eea5c s4:samldb LDB module - fix userAccountControl handling
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via fef1174 s4:web_server - immeditately assign wdata as private data
for the stream socket
from a87b2f9 s4:urgent_replication.py - remove a now superflous RELAX
control
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via dbaeb52 Add OPLOCK4 test which explores how Windows copes with
oplock and share mode breaks on hard links.
from fef1174 s4:web_server - immeditately assign wdata as private data
for the stream socket
The branch, v3-6-test has been updated
via aa16bf4 Add OPLOCK4 test which explores how Windows copes with
oplock and share mode breaks on hard links.
from c17f3e7 s3: Fix bug 7917: Yet another bug in chain_reply
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v3-6-test
- Log
33 matches
Mail list logo