On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:21:13PM +0300, Tom H. Lautenbacher wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I am having severe problems with my Samba PDC.
>
> 1. My Roaming profile in 3 out of 10 times does not get synchronized
...
>
> 2. When I edit a document (e.g. word .docx) which is located on a
...
>
> 3. Some
Not sure if you import all the users and groups into your /etc/passwd and
/etc/group file respectively, would fix your problem.
On 29/03/2011, at 11:39 PM, Werner Durgarten wrote:
> Similar Problem here: Since Upgrading to Sernet Samba 3.5.8 logging in
> without typing in the default domain d
Is this with one Windows 7 X64 client or all of them?
Do XP machines have the same problem?
Do the disconnects occur after the machine has been in sleep mode?
On 03/30/2011 04:21 PM, Tom H. Lautenbacher wrote:
Hello all!
I am having severe problems with my Samba PDC.
1. My Roaming profile in
Hello all!
I am having severe problems with my Samba PDC.
1. My Roaming profile in 3 out of 10 times does not get synchronized
correctly with the server - without any obvious reason. This sometimes
destroys my profile by losing data and commonly from then on the profile
is never again synchro
Also check /var/cache/samba
Dale
On 03/30/2011 11:48 AM, Brian O'Mahony wrote:
samba3-3.4.11-42.el5
However I have moved to using idmap_rid, as I will have cold standbys of
machines that I want to be able to access SAN data, with the same IDs.
So how does one go about clearing the samba use
In answer to vandal: Yes, they are A/PTR records, and not cname.
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
my guess is that reverse DNS lookups are failing for the IP
Walt Park wrote:
Why would it be different between a microsoft share, and a samba share?
A microsoft share works wth either name or IP, but samba only works for
name, and not IP. Also, when it fails with "trust" error I never see a
conn
Why would it be different between a microsoft share, and a samba share?
A microsoft share works wth either name or IP, but samba only works for
name, and not IP. Also, when it fails with "trust" error I never see a
connection
attempt at the samba server.
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Volker L
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 22:43:38 +0900, TAKAHASHI Motonobu wrote:
> From: Felix Brack
> Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 10:09:53 +0100
>
>> After an upgrade to samba 3.5.8 (from 3.2.5) the option 'dos filemode'
>> does not seem to work anymore. If I (as a user) do not own the file I
>> can't change permissio
samba3-3.4.11-42.el5
However I have moved to using idmap_rid, as I will have cold standbys of
machines that I want to be able to access SAN data, with the same IDs.
So how does one go about clearing the samba user cache? I had it set up with
users starting at 1. With RID I have now brought
Do you have "PTR" entries in DNS for all the servers?
On 03/30/2011 12:35 PM, Walt Park wrote:
Well.. all my samba boxes are behaving the same way.
When joined to the AD, they work when addressed by name, but
fail trust with the AD when addressed by IP. AD is controlled
by windows 2003, not b
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 09:42:33AM -0500, Walt Park wrote:
> Any idea why IP mount fails trust with 2003 AD but Name would be ok?
> Is this a microsoft-ism to hate on samba, or am I missing something in my
> config?
It's possible that via name you're using kerberos but via ip
you're using ntlm. In
Well.. all my samba boxes are behaving the same way.
When joined to the AD, they work when addressed by name, but
fail trust with the AD when addressed by IP. AD is controlled
by windows 2003, not by samba. I'm pretty sure if I made a samba
PDC, I could get this to work, but I can't because that's
What version of samba? I found that samba 3.0.x (as bundled with
solaris) had problems with idmap. This was with LDAP backend, a Samba
DC with trusts to Windows 2003 domain (in NT domain compatibility
mode.) Samba would allocate idmap entries in ldap, and would populate
the TDB cache files
I have run into issues where by IP it worked, but not by name (this was
with one particular samba server, with VPN clients, with WINS and
Netbios not enabled over VPN.) So it does seem possible that the
server handles requests based on name and IP differently.
Are all machines (samba, win 2
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:11 AM, John Drescher wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Jean-Pierre
> wrote:
>> John Drescher wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Andreas Moroder
>>> wrote:
Hallo,
we have a clinical system that generate lot of files that once w
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Jean-Pierre
wrote:
> John Drescher wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Andreas Moroder
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hallo,
>>>
>>> we have a clinical system that generate lot of files that once written
>>> are
>>> never changed. This file consume lot of disk and
John Drescher wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Andreas Moroder
wrote:
Hallo,
we have a clinical system that generate lot of files that once written are
never changed. This file consume lot of disk and tape space*, so my idea was
to compress this files. The problem is that it can happen
Hi.
I've got some samba servers (3.0.33-3.29.el5_6.2, on redhat 5) that join a
windows 2003 AD.
When mounting the volume from a windows workstation, if I use
\\ip.address.here
it fails saying "The trust relationship between this workstation and the
primary domain failed'"
If I mount with \\fully
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Andreas Moroder
wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> we have a clinical system that generate lot of files that once written are
> never changed. This file consume lot of disk and tape space*, so my idea was
> to compress this files. The problem is that it can happen, that the users
Il 30/03/2011 15:41, Andreas Moroder ha scritto:
Hallo,
we have a clinical system that generate lot of files that once written
are never changed. This file consume lot of disk and tape space*, so my
idea was to compress this files. The problem is that it can happen, that
the users have to open t
Il 30/03/2011 15:41, Andreas Moroder ha scritto:
Hallo,
we have a clinical system that generate lot of files that once written
are never changed. This file consume lot of disk and tape space*, so my
idea was to compress this files. The problem is that it can happen, that
the users have to open t
After a bit of googling, I found that the idmap has been corrupted. Why
would/could this happen?
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On
Behalf Of Brian O'Mahony
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 2:37 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Sub
Hallo,
we have a clinical system that generate lot of files that once written
are never changed. This file consume lot of disk and tape space*, so my
idea was to compress this files. The problem is that it can happen, that
the users have to open this files later.
Is there a VFS module for sa
This is a windows share. But I am trying to mount it from Linux.
I tried iocharset=utf8 option, but it didn't work.
If I map the same share from laptop (Windows OS), it work fine.
I enabled CIFS debugging. Following are errors:
==
Ive recently installed three servers with RHEL5u5. After some messing on the
original, I got samba working with ADS authentication. I then went and got it
working so that users could log in using their domain name & password to the
box. I got this working with both no restriction, and ADS group
t; is in the conf, so manual creation should not be
> needed.
>>
>> better question is: does the machine account actually get created in
>> the right place?
>
> Yes, tne machines account are created under the "Computers" OU, where samba
> should lookup
So your ideas are highly
appreciated.
Andrés
PS: Did you see something wrong in our smb.conf.?
Andrés
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
__ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antiviru
2011/3/24 John Drescher :
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Chris Weiss wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:40 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Andres Tarallo wrote:
2011/3/23 Gaiseric Vandal :
> Did you try manually creating a unix "user" account for the s
2011/3/24 Chris Weiss :
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:40 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Andres Tarallo wrote:
>>> 2011/3/23 Gaiseric Vandal :
Did you try manually creating a unix "user" account for the samba machine?
Does "getent passwd" show that machine?
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
