I found out that tweaking some configuration options made it work.
In case anyone wants to follow this, or wants the fix's details, I
filed a bug here: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8448
-John
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:52 PM, John W wrote:
> I have tried downgrading to 3.4, and I g
I have tried downgrading to 3.4, and I get the same (or very similar)
issue - core dump when I try to connect.
Is Samba 3.4/3.5 just broken on FreeBSD 7.2 amd64? That seems crazy...
I would go back to 3.3, but it's an unsupported version and not
available in ports anymore ):
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011
A little more investigation seems to indicate that the gencache.tdb
error is actually not the issue.
In fact, I removed the file (since it is not necessary for operation),
and still got a core dump.
So it looks like the reinit_after_fork() is the real problem.
But no clue why that would be happeni
Ok, after looking at some logs, it turns out samba is dumping core ):
Does anyone know what might be the cause of this?
It seems related to my gencache.tdb file, but no idea what's going on really.
log tail:
[2011/09/08 22:29:41, 0] lib/util_tdb.c:tdb_log(682)
tdb(/var/db/samba/gencache.tdb):
Hi,
I recently updated my Samba from 3.3 to 3.5, and while that worked
fine, I can no longer access my shares - it asks for a password, which
fails even if I do enter a correct one.
Here is one of my shares - very simple, I think:
[myshare]
comment = My Share
path = /path/to/myshare
pub
I created the well known group Domain Admins pointing to a local group,
but I am not able to add users to the group -- it claims I can only add
users to
local or global groups...
But I only see local, domain ,well-known, builtin.
There are no global groups unless one would include all groups t
Thanks Volker, regarding Valgrind. And thanks for the reply Jeff.
You guys have made me feel better about Samba, because it supports
what I was noticing in that although Samba memory usage was
increasing, I was not seeing it consuming the amount of memory that I
saw being cached. Maybe I should b
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:14:47 -0700
Kathy wrote:
> That's possible and yesterday I was looking at possibly using Valgrind
> to see if I could dig further into that idea. I've never used it
> before, though, so not sure if there is an easier method to detect
> kernel memory leaks.
>
> And about st
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:14:47AM -0700, Kathy wrote:
> That's possible and yesterday I was looking at possibly using Valgrind
> to see if I could dig further into that idea. I've never used it
> before, though, so not sure if there is an easier method to detect
> kernel memory leaks.
valgrind w
> I get the same results when mounting the share from Linux using
> these two different commands;
>
> mount -t cifs //bsd-host/test2 /mnt/test2
>
> and,
>
> mount -t cifs -o file_mode=0777,dir_mode=0777 //bsd-host/test2 /mnt/test2
try,
$ mount -t cifs -o noperm //bsd-host/test2 /mnt/test2
From: phpMagpie
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
> The first validation step is to run 'smbclient -L localhost -U%'.
>
> *It should have returned something like:*
> Sharename Type Comment
> - ---
> Plans Disk
> I
From: "James D. Parra"
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:31:48 -0700 (PDT)
(snip)
> When a windows machine writes to the dir the permissions look
> fine. For example,
>
> -rwxrw-rw- 1 nobody nobody 0 Sep 7 13:38 New Text Document.txt
>
> However, if a Linux machine mounts the share and any user other t
That's possible and yesterday I was looking at possibly using Valgrind
to see if I could dig further into that idea. I've never used it
before, though, so not sure if there is an easier method to detect
kernel memory leaks.
And about static things in swap, I agree. I have noticed on our old
Clea
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 09:14:48AM -0700, Kathy wrote:
> I agree with you there, that it's not very much memory consumed. Even
> over 12 hours (what it took to drag all the 32 GB down into swap), I
> was not seeing any one or two processes consuming huge quantities of
> memory, Gdmgreeter and pyt
I agree with you there, that it's not very much memory consumed. Even
over 12 hours (what it took to drag all the 32 GB down into swap), I
was not seeing any one or two processes consuming huge quantities of
memory, Gdmgreeter and python (for Redhat updates) consumed more
memory than any smbd pro
Hi,
What did I miss / do wrong? My config didn't work like on the
below linked video:
http://www.samba.org/~tridge/ctdb_movies/node_disable.html
With my config, the copy process fails/breaks despite that the
tesztxp PC successfully maps the other (samba) PC in case the
first (samba) PC is out. In
16 matches
Mail list logo
