Added to global section
vfs objects = acl_xattr
No changes. Still dont store DOS attr.
You only need acl_xattr is you want to store Windows ACLs, not DOS attrs.
Have you tried using setfattr on that filesystem ? Does it work ?
Jeremy.
Hello Jeremy!
You are right!
I don't want to store
On 2011-12-15 08:02, Kai Blin wrote:
Hi Piotr,
These two settings are not related to domain controllers, they
control if the box wants to be a domain master browser for the
NetBIOS browsing elections.
Hm, actually the domain master setting does matter for the PDC. It's
really been a while
who to join samba as DC to windows without add windows dns?
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Mohammad Ebrahim Abravi lamp@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Samba4 joined to server 2003 as a DC with this command:
samba-tool domain join samba.example.com DC -Uadministrator
--realm=samba.example.com
I manage a Samba server that has been working nicely for a couple of
months (after it replace the old Samba server which worked happily for
years). We use LDAP for accounts, but don't use domain logons or
anything fancy.
All users have their home dir on Samba mapped to drive 'M:'. In their
On 12/14/2011 09:12 AM, steve wrote:
On 12/09/2011 07:38 PM, Dale Schroeder wrote:
Yes, that seems to explain it. I have
listen-on-v6 { any; };
in /etc/named.conf
I think that this should be commented (#) as I don't have any ip6
addresses.
Can confirm that commenting the line removes the
Have you considered you may have already reached the best under your
network condition?
Cheers
-David
2011/12/15 sathishkumar kanagaraj sathish.kanaga...@gmail.com
Hi,
i am using smb2 max read/write/credits value 5 times the default
value in smb.conf file. Even this changes i am getting
Hello,
I have a strange problem. I've re-included a XP SP3 pro in my samba
domain. Only the administrators can authenticate and enter in a windows
session.
All other users can't.
smb version : 3.3.5
Any help would be appreciate ...
regards
--
Hervé Hénoch
Responsable informatique
On Sunday 11 December 2011 15:58:31 Davy Loose wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm currently using Ubuntu 10.04 for setting up Samba4 and I'm having a
problem with the dlz_dlopen driver.
I've installed Bind9 from hauke
(https://launchpad.net/~hauke/+archive/bind9) because the bind9 version
from the
It might be an issues with group mappings (for the well know groups.)
Can you verify that the net groupmap list shows at a minimum
Domain Users and Domain Admins.
If you login as Administrator, can you can network users or groups to
the local Users group?
Does pdbedit -Lv show the
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:10:11AM +, Hilton, David wrote:
No, the only error that we see is the getpeername failed error in the Samba
log for the client machine that is trying to print the job.
Then I doubt it's a signing issue (which makes it strange).
What does a debug level 10 say ?
On 12/14/2011 4:35 PM, skull wrote:
woudln't work because all the users are in one group anyway.
and i am not allowed to to give read rights do any (i.e. 755)
but theres really no option in smb.conf like read only users = or
something like that?
read list = user1 user2
Am 13.12.2011
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:17:21PM +0400, Dmitry Mordovin wrote:
Added to global section
vfs objects = acl_xattr
No changes. Still dont store DOS attr.
You only need acl_xattr is you want to store Windows ACLs, not DOS attrs.
Have you tried using setfattr on that filesystem ? Does
I remember conversing with Jeremy at the beginning of the year re: issues with
samba's print notifications to clients (specifically XP) with firewalls enabled.
I believe that an option to turn this behavior off was going to be added.
Does anyone know if the option was added and if so, beginning
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 07:18:03PM +, Tom Ryan wrote:
I remember conversing with Jeremy at the beginning of the year re: issues
with samba's print notifications to clients (specifically XP) with firewalls
enabled.
I believe that an option to turn this behavior off was going to be
hi,
i am using 1G switch tried testparm to validate the smb.conf, its
giving like unknown parameter found and ignoring for smb2 max w
Have you considered you may have already reached the best under your
network condition?
Cheers
-David
2011/12/15 sathishkumar kanagaraj
Got few help, but still not working. Anyone know the configuration for
full read and write for everyone. So no security needed or permission,
ownership, or objects. Just full read and write for everyone.
All the different configurations that I have tried (these are 3 separate
smb.conf config
BTW, this is my smbstatus:
PID UID DenyMode Access R/W OpLock Share
5773 65534 DENY_NONE 0x100081RDONLY NONE /home/project
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Jessica Guynn jessgu...@gmail.com wrote:
Got few help, but still not working. Anyone know the
On Friday 16 December 2011 00:37:12 Jessica Guynn wrote:
BTW, this is my smbstatus:
PID UID DenyMode Access R/W OpLock Share
5773 65534 DENY_NONE 0x100081RDONLY NONE /home/project
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Jessica Guynn jessgu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 08:17 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 11:22 +0100, Alexander Födisch wrote:
Hi,
does anybody know how to decode/recode sambaMungedDial attribute? I need to
store the terminal server profile path in it
but can not find any documentation.
Hello Jeremy!
You are right!
I don't want to store Windows ACLs, need only DOS attrs (hidden file attr).
What Is enough to add to my smb.conf?
'store dos attributes (S) or 'map hidden (S)' or together or else?
I use:
store dos attributes = yes
map readonly = no
map system = no
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 02:56:08AM +0100, Günter Kukkukk wrote:
On Friday 16 December 2011 00:37:12 Jessica Guynn wrote:
BTW, this is my smbstatus:
PID UID DenyMode Access R/W OpLock Share
5773 65534 DENY_NONE 0x100081RDONLY NONE /home/project
On
Hello
I've the following event which happens when I try to connect a XP SP3
Pro to samba 3.5 domain :
* Administrators of the domain can log in.
* Users of the domain can't. An empty msgbox appears and that's all.
If I give a bad password, it is indicated so the user is seen in
What are your rights from prompt:
Ls -la yourshare
Does other have drwxr-xr-x
If your path is within another directory, other must have the x options even
in the directory above.
This solved a nearly the same problem for me in CENTOS.
---
EDV
The branch, master has been updated
via 19078b9 s3:smbd/globals: remove unused msg_ctx_to_sconn()
via 0345551 s3:smbd: pass smbd_server_connection and a snumused
function pointer to reload_services()
via 5061dd2 s3:printing/spoolssd: pass event and messaging context to
The branch, master has been updated
via 8eeb3ff s3-dbwrap: All relevant backends provide parse_record().
Remove the fallback.
via f6d8f74 s3-dbwrap: Remove the fetch db_context callback
via b5d056c s3-dbwrap: Rewrite dbwrap_fetch in terms of
dbwrap_parse_record
via
The branch, master has been updated
via d0330c7 s3-libsmb: Don't duplicate kerberos service tickets.
from 8eeb3ff s3-dbwrap: All relevant backends provide parse_record().
Remove the fallback.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 851b9e9 s3:vfs fix up vfs_gpfs after function pointer renames
from d0330c7 s3-libsmb: Don't duplicate kerberos service tickets.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 1355f0a s3: Fix a typo
from 851b9e9 s3:vfs fix up vfs_gpfs after function pointer renames
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log -
commit
The autobuild test system has detected an intermittent failing test in
the current master tree.
The autobuild log of the failure is available here:
http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2011-12-16-0022/flakey.log
The samba3 build logs are available here:
The branch, master has been updated
via d62de8d lib/param: Set s4 host msdfs = true by default
via 77a551d loadparm: fixed service list handling
via fae42c1 pidfile: use set_close_on_exec()
via 9f4c3da s4-socket: use set_close_on_exec()
via d581c9d genrand:
The branch, master has been updated
via c5cbe48 Third part of fix for bug #8663 - deleting a symlink fails
if the symlink target is outside of the share.
via f448c0e Second part of fix for bug #8663 - deleting a symlink fails
if the symlink target is outside of the share.
31 matches
Mail list logo