Am 31.03.2012 20:56, schrieb Steve Thompson:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
Well, did not try, but guess it happens the same.
Just for completeness, which version of samba did you use for ldap
failover?
I was using 3.0.33 at the time, on CentOS 5 x86_64. Not sure which
rev
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
Well, did not try, but guess it happens the same.
Just for completeness, which version of samba did you use for ldap failover?
I was using 3.0.33 at the time, on CentOS 5 x86_64. Not sure which
revision of CentOS; it was a while ago.
Steve
Well, did not try, but guess it happens the same.
Just for completeness, which version of samba did you use for ldap failover?
Il 31 marzo 2012 19:04, Steve Thompson ha scritto:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
>
>> I'm exactly using that, without luck...
>
>
> Not sure what t
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote:
I'm exactly using that, without luck...
Not sure what to tell you; I have used multiple LDAP servers in the past
with success, although these days I use a single virtual LDAP server which
load balances across a set of backend servers. What h
I'm exactly using that, without luck...
--
Massimiliano Perantoni
site: http://www.perantoni.net
Il 31 marzo 2012 15:35, Steve Thompson ha scritto:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
>
>> I don't think Samba (depending on the version) supports multiple ldap
>> backends. You should
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
I don't think Samba (depending on the version) supports multiple ldap
backends.You should have samba_server_1 using ldap_server_1 and
samba_server_2 using ldap_server_2.
Samba most certainly does support multiple LDAP backends. There's even an
e
On 2012-03-30 12:35 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
I was simply pointing out that the *default* behavior was to always
cache all data in redirected folders on the local client using the tried
and true 'offline files' technology, but in a different way with respect
to Redirected Folders (with Windows
On 2012-03-30 3:18 AM, steve wrote:
El 29/03/12 22:36, Miguel Medalha escribió:
>> Charles wrote:
The stuff in t he roaming profiles (very little) is copied back/forth
at login/out, the stuff in t he redirected folders is *synchronized*
at all times using the Offline Files technology that has
The matter is that, since the manual indicates so, it should be
supported and delegated to the ldap api in use...
The openldap api supports rebinding. The proof of it is that if in
/etc/ldap.conf I put in the uri 2 ldap servers everything works fine.
The matter seems that samba, even using such an
I don't think Samba (depending on the version) supports multiple ldap
backends.You should have samba_server_1 using ldap_server_1 and
samba_server_2 using ldap_server_2.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Massimili
Hi,
I have a quite "simple" setup for a particular customer that loves
redundancy and failover.
PDC + BDC with LDAP Passwords on two 389-ds in multimaster node +
several samba member servers
Actually pointing singularly on both the systems everything works great.
As soon as I modify my passdb back
11 matches
Mail list logo