Re: [Samba] Samba LDAP Failover

2012-03-31 Thread Stephan
Am 31.03.2012 20:56, schrieb Steve Thompson: On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote: Well, did not try, but guess it happens the same. Just for completeness, which version of samba did you use for ldap failover? I was using 3.0.33 at the time, on CentOS 5 x86_64. Not sure which rev

Re: [Samba] Samba LDAP Failover

2012-03-31 Thread Steve Thompson
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote: Well, did not try, but guess it happens the same. Just for completeness, which version of samba did you use for ldap failover? I was using 3.0.33 at the time, on CentOS 5 x86_64. Not sure which revision of CentOS; it was a while ago. Steve

Re: [Samba] Samba LDAP Failover

2012-03-31 Thread Massimiliano Perantoni
Well, did not try, but guess it happens the same. Just for completeness, which version of samba did you use for ldap failover? Il 31 marzo 2012 19:04, Steve Thompson ha scritto: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote: > >> I'm exactly using that, without luck... > > > Not sure what t

Re: [Samba] Samba LDAP Failover

2012-03-31 Thread Steve Thompson
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Massimiliano Perantoni wrote: I'm exactly using that, without luck... Not sure what to tell you; I have used multiple LDAP servers in the past with success, although these days I use a single virtual LDAP server which load balances across a set of backend servers. What h

Re: [Samba] Samba LDAP Failover

2012-03-31 Thread Massimiliano Perantoni
I'm exactly using that, without luck... -- Massimiliano Perantoni site: http://www.perantoni.net Il 31 marzo 2012 15:35, Steve Thompson ha scritto: > On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Gaiseric Vandal wrote: > >> I don't think Samba (depending on the version) supports multiple ldap >> backends.    You should

Re: [Samba] Samba LDAP Failover

2012-03-31 Thread Steve Thompson
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Gaiseric Vandal wrote: I don't think Samba (depending on the version) supports multiple ldap backends.You should have samba_server_1 using ldap_server_1 and samba_server_2 using ldap_server_2. Samba most certainly does support multiple LDAP backends. There's even an e

Re: [Samba] windows 7 roaming profiles

2012-03-31 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2012-03-30 12:35 PM, Charles Marcus wrote: I was simply pointing out that the *default* behavior was to always cache all data in redirected folders on the local client using the tried and true 'offline files' technology, but in a different way with respect to Redirected Folders (with Windows

Re: [Samba] windows 7 roaming profiles

2012-03-31 Thread Charles Marcus
On 2012-03-30 3:18 AM, steve wrote: El 29/03/12 22:36, Miguel Medalha escribió: >> Charles wrote: The stuff in t he roaming profiles (very little) is copied back/forth at login/out, the stuff in t he redirected folders is *synchronized* at all times using the Offline Files technology that has

Re: [Samba] Samba LDAP Failover

2012-03-31 Thread Massimiliano Perantoni
The matter is that, since the manual indicates so, it should be supported and delegated to the ldap api in use... The openldap api supports rebinding. The proof of it is that if in /etc/ldap.conf I put in the uri 2 ldap servers everything works fine. The matter seems that samba, even using such an

Re: [Samba] Samba LDAP Failover

2012-03-31 Thread Gaiseric Vandal
I don't think Samba (depending on the version) supports multiple ldap backends.You should have samba_server_1 using ldap_server_1 and samba_server_2 using ldap_server_2. -Original Message- From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Massimili

[Samba] Samba LDAP Failover

2012-03-31 Thread Massimiliano Perantoni
Hi, I have a quite "simple" setup for a particular customer that loves redundancy and failover. PDC + BDC with LDAP Passwords on two 389-ds in multimaster node + several samba member servers Actually pointing singularly on both the systems everything works great. As soon as I modify my passdb back