Hello everyone,
I am using samba4 as my Primary Domain Controller in my company. But I am
concerned if my DC goes down due to some reason then is there any way I can
create a Backup Domain Controller or Secondary Domain Controller which can be
used at that moment of time so that all my users
Il 03/08/2012 16:21, steve ha scritto:
That's quite easy in Samba3 but which tdb's must I remove in Samba4? In
fact, how would I rejoin the DC to itself?
You shouldn't use DCs for anything else other than DC. No file server.
No gateway. *Nothing*. They're a crytical piece of your network
On 04/08/12 09:39, NdK wrote:
Il 03/08/2012 16:21, steve ha scritto:
That's quite easy in Samba3 but which tdb's must I remove in Samba4? In
fact, how would I rejoin the DC to itself?
You shouldn't use DCs for anything else other than DC. No file server.
No gateway. *Nothing*. They're a
On 03/08/12 21:54, Gémes Géza wrote:
2012-08-03 18:46 keltezéssel, steve írta:
On 03/08/12 13:39, Gémes Géza wrote:
2012-08-03 13:07 keltezéssel, steve írta:
Three unfathormable questions:
1.
What's the difference between:
idmap_ldb : use rfc2307 = Yes
It is a samba4 winbind setting, so you
Hello everyone,
I was trying to configure NTP server in my samba4 server but it's not working.
I am using CentOS 6.3 (32 bit) for my samba4 server.
I installed ntp using yum and the ntp version is 4.2.4
added this line in /etc/ntp.conf
restrict mynet mssntp
signdsocketdir
Il 04/08/2012 12:00, steve ha scritto:
You have many ways to obtain that same mapping objective. I chose to
use rid 'cause I couldn't modify my AD schema. But the preferred way is
extend AD schema and specify there the UIDs and GIDs.
You don't have to extend the schema. You can store all the
On 04/08/12 13:21, NdK wrote:
Il 04/08/2012 12:00, steve ha scritto:
You have many ways to obtain that same mapping objective. I chose to
use rid 'cause I couldn't modify my AD schema. But the preferred way is
extend AD schema and specify there the UIDs and GIDs.
You don't have to extend the
On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 14:36 -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
Hi all,
Hope this isn't off-topic, but I thought the lists
might be interested in a video interview I did with Eben
Moglen, the head of the Software Freedom Law Center. Eben
has given legal advice and help for Samba for many
Hello everybody,
I am using Ubuntu 12.04LTS server running samba server on it. I have
problem accessing the shares from Windows XP with \\servername\share,
but no problem accessing \\ip\share. How can i correct this problem?. I
have tried every single example found on google with no good
Carlos R. Pena wrote on Sat 04 Aug at 16:28 UK time
Hello everybody,
I am using Ubuntu 12.04LTS server running samba server on it. I have
problem accessing the shares from Windows XP with \\servername\share,
but no problem accessing \\ip\share. How can i correct this problem?. I
have
|Hi
Running SWAT aginst samba produces the following error. The browser
would only display
the SAMBA-header and no configuration-details at all.
Any hint?
Thanks
Urs
|//|
Aug 4 17:38:17 beech swat[1086]: connect from 192.168.51.36 (192.168.51.36)
Aug 4 17:38:20 beech swat[1087]: connect
Il 04/08/2012 13:40, steve ha scritto:
Too bad my AD controllers are M$ W2k3, w/o rfc2307 extension :( That's
why I'm stuck with rid.
Ah I see. I didn't mean to offend.
No offense perceived :)
I simply assumed you were using Samba4.
If only I could...
I think m$ gave them the 2008 schema as
On 04/08/12 20:34, NdK wrote:
Il 04/08/2012 13:40, steve ha scritto:
Too bad my AD controllers are M$ W2k3, w/o rfc2307 extension :( That's
why I'm stuck with rid.
Ah I see. I didn't mean to offend.
No offense perceived :)
Hi
That's good to know it wasn't a misunderstanding.
Most of our
Il 04/08/2012 21:13, steve ha scritto:
In comparison, winbind seems overcomplicated and restrictive (and simply
does not work with either Ubuntu nor openSUSE 3.6.3). It also seems very
restricted in that we have turn off unix attributes and use wide links
so we can symlink to the only
I had this issue before and solved it by adding my subnet to the list of hosts
allowed to access samba.
i.e.
hosts allow = 127. 192.168.0. (your.subnet.here.)
I had this issue when trying to access samba from a machine connected via our
corporate VPN and needed to add the subnet into the list.
2012-08-04 12:07 keltezéssel, steve írta:
On 03/08/12 21:54, Gémes Géza wrote:
2012-08-03 18:46 keltezéssel, steve írta:
On 03/08/12 13:39, Gémes Géza wrote:
2012-08-03 13:07 keltezéssel, steve írta:
Three unfathormable questions:
1.
What's the difference between:
idmap_ldb : use rfc2307 =
The branch, master has been updated
via 49d0432 s3:smbd: setup session-global-signing_/application_key
during SPNEGO SMB1 session setups
via 2265e46 s3:smbd: setup session-global-signing_/application_key
during old SMB1 session setups
via 3d63e4d s3:smbd: keep the
The branch, master has been updated
via 401860c s3:smbd: add support for SMB_EXTENDED_SIGNATURES in SMBtconX
via ff75fd9 s3:smbd: setup the application session key with the first
tcon on a session
via 3a0db4d s3:rpc_server/wkssvc: make usage of
The branch, master has been updated
via 41cffa3 doc: Remove build/ from doxygen config or it will not work
in brew.
from 401860c s3:smbd: add support for SMB_EXTENDED_SIGNATURES in SMBtconX
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 86ee590 s4:domain join: setup RODC invocationId
from 41cffa3 doc: Remove build/ from doxygen config or it will not work
in brew.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
20 matches
Mail list logo
