On 2012-09-12 20:28, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> While it's possible to create reverse zone in samba4 directory, it's
> impossible to update it the same way as forward zone.
Why? How did you create the zone, how did you try to update it, and what
exactly happens?
> Does any solution exist which allows
Hi,
I'm getting "Permission denied" error while connecting to a EMC cifs share
from samba client on unix machine.
Looking at the packet capture it is observed that samba client is
authenticating with "anonymous" instead of the user name that has been provided.
Here are flags received from EMC ser
Release Announcements
-
This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.0.0! This is *not*
intended for production environments and is designed for testing
purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting
system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/.
What's new
It is probably not strictly related to SAMBA itself but let me try to ask you
for advice.
Using smbmount I have mounted one of smb/cifs share to /root/test.
This share has RW access and no authentication is required.
Now, under DOSBox, whenever I try to mount /root/test I get this error
(command s
On 13/09/12 12:40, Karolin Seeger wrote:
Release Announcements
Is the Internal DNS now the default?
I upgraded from beta 8 and could only get the samba binary to work if I
stopped by distro's bind configured with bind dlz Here it is with bind
working:
failed to bind to fe80::212:f0ff:fe06:
On 13/09/12 17:34, steve wrote:
On 13/09/12 12:40, Karolin Seeger wrote:
Release Announcements
Is the Internal DNS now the default?
I upgraded from beta 8 and could only get the samba binary to work if
I stopped by distro's bind configured with bind dlz Here it is with
bind working:
faile
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:36:14AM -0700, naga_kishore_komm...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm getting "Permission denied" error while connecting to a EMC cifs share
> from samba client on unix machine.
> Looking at the packet capture it is observed that samba client is
> authenticating with "anonym
On 13/09/12 18:47, Rowland Penny wrote:
On 13/09/12 17:34, steve wrote:
On 13/09/12 12:40, Karolin Seeger wrote:
Release Announcements
Is the Internal DNS now the default?
I upgraded from beta 8 and could only get the samba binary to work if
I stopped by distro's bind configured with bind dl
Centos 6.3, patched as of yesterday.
Beta 8 was compiled and run successfully on the same machine yesterday, and
I was able to fully configure and join a domain.
With today's RC1 release, I downloaded the source,
configure.developer/make, but make failed (really, it just hangs forever)
after:
[1
On 13/09/12 18:33, steve wrote:
On 13/09/12 18:47, Rowland Penny wrote:
On 13/09/12 17:34, steve wrote:
On 13/09/12 12:40, Karolin Seeger wrote:
Release Announcements
Is the Internal DNS now the default?
I upgraded from beta 8 and could only get the samba binary to work if
I stopped by dist
On 13/09/12 20:17, Rowland Penny wrote:
On 13/09/12 18:33, steve wrote:
On 13/09/12 18:47, Rowland Penny wrote:
On 13/09/12 17:34, steve wrote:
On 13/09/12 12:40, Karolin Seeger wrote:
Release Announcements
Is the Internal DNS now the default?
I upgraded from beta 8 and could only get the
On 9/13/12, steve wrote:
> Thanks for that but I can't reporovision. Who can? I have 150 linux, xp
> and w7 clients to support. I simply cannot start from bare metal.
>
> To be able to do that I would have to have a reliable backup. Evidently
> neither the backup scripts in samba-master nor rsync
Hi,
I would like to ask a help for know how I can fix the problem with the
administrator user.
So, I tried to change the administrator password with the command
"smbpasswd -U administrador", but it not worked and I got below messages:
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
Unable to modify
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:27:24AM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:36:14AM -0700, naga_kishore_komm...@yahoo.com
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm getting "Permission denied" error while connecting to a EMC cifs share
> > from samba client on unix machine.
> > Looking at the packe
Hi,
This problem is solved in our instance, but want to report it here because
I'm curious about the root cause, and also for others who may see it.
We have a Samba server (3.4.7) which is mounted by various Windows
workstations. It also, unrelated to that, has CIFS mounts of a half-dozen
other W
OK i'm intrigued. I've been watching the various beta pages on the wiki for
Samba 4 since it went beta and I still don't quite get something
"Samba 4.0 beta ships with two distinct file servers. We now use the
file server from the Samba 3.x series 'smbd' for all file serving by
default.
Samba
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Karolin Seeger wrote:
[...]
> - Domain member support in the 'samba' binary is in it's infancy, and
> is not comparable to the support found in winbindd. As such, do not
> use the 'samba' binary (provided for the AD server) on a member
> server.
Stupid "bug
> I have three DC's in an environment, and ldapcmp is failing. How can I figure
> out either what went wrong, or how to resolve the issue so that the databases
> are truly in sync?
Nobody ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.sa
On 14 September 2012 06:48, Ricky Nance wrote:
> Maybe this will help ;) I also cleaned up references to 'beta'.
Not sure if some of those should say RC1 instead of just Samba 4.0.
Also, you have an extra space at the start of the line in this part:
If you are upgrading, or looking to develop,
Hi Scott,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:55:55PM -0400, Scott Lovenberg wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Karolin Seeger wrote:
> [...]
> > - Domain member support in the 'samba' binary is in it's infancy, and
> > is not comparable to the support found in winbindd. As such, do not
> > us
20 matches
Mail list logo
