Using the internal / default DNS server should the command
"samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names" work?
Looking at the wiki this appears to be part of step#9, but I not sure
the test shouldn't succeed.
$ samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names
...
; TSIG error with server: tsig verify fail
I'm struggling with following symlinks with samba on the recent
versions. I cannot use mount -bind as I've seen others suggest. This is
for my mythtv backend, so I'm using the rename script to create nice
names for the recordings.
Anyway, I can map the drive from Windows XP and Windows 7, and
I've performed a *successful* domain migration from S3/LDAPSAM to
S4.0.0. Yay! I can browse and connect to the server from a
workstation [logged in as a local account]. DNS looks good. kinit &
klist work. I was able to *add* a workstation to the domain.
But I can't get roaming profiles to w
According to the Samba documentation, the manpages are supposed to be
installed with Samba. Quote:
docs/manpages: You don't need to worry about these yet; during the
installation, the files will be installed so that you can use the man
command to read them. But you can take a look in the direc
On 14/12/12 04:29 PM, Aaron Wood wrote:
Hello All,
Today I was able to implement Samba4 as a DC with AD in a test
environment. I eventually got it all working and was able to join the
domain from two different virtual machines. I was also able to set up
a roaming profile share and configure a
(...) is there a solution to this behavior.
Partial folder redirection?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
On Fri, 14 Dec 2012, Aaron Wood wrote:
In my opinion this cripples the roaming profile functionality unless
your enter network is make up of computers using the same OS. Is this a
bug, or is there a solution to this behavior.
It's not a bug, and there is no solution, since it is designed that
On the samba-technical mailing list there is this exact problem
detailed, so your help is no longer needed to configure reading of
unixHomeDirectory and loginShell by other users, but the question about
anonymous access still stands - it would be much better for each client
to have anonymous ac
Hello All,
Today I was able to implement Samba4 as a DC with AD in a test
environment. I eventually got it all working and was able to join the
domain from two different virtual machines. I was also able to set up a
roaming profile share and configure a user to utilize this share. My
issue is
Hello,
I have samba 3.5.6 PDC and BDC on debian squeeze with openldap backend
and couple samba member servers based on samba 3.5.15 and 3.6.6 on
solaris 11 delivering shares to windows and linux users.
recently we moved from samba 3.0.24 on solaris to above verions and we
stuck with a probl
In our current testing environment, we are using nslcd to get user and
group information from the Samba4 LDAP server, using the last part of
objectSid as uidNumber. The configuration is designed to pull down
unixHomeDirectory and loginShell if they exist, but they default to
standard values if
Dear Cesare,
On 12/14/2012 03:51 PM, Berni CED wrote:
>> > I've retried commenting out this line and repeating the entire copy with
>> > robocopy: now the disk usage corresponds to the one reported by Windows
>> > and by
>> > "du -s -h --apparent-size".
> To summarize, in my case "strict allocate
Berni CED bernispa.com> writes:
> Berni CED bernispa.com> writes:
> > strict allocate = yes
>
> I've retried commenting out this line and repeating the entire copy with
> robocopy: now the disk usage corresponds to the one reported by Windows and by
> "du -s -h --apparent-size".
To summari
Berni CED bernispa.com> writes:
> strict allocate = yes
I've retried commenting out this line and repeating the entire copy with
robocopy: now the disk usage corresponds to the one reported by Windows and by
"du -s -h --apparent-size".
Are there any technical reason for that? Should i file a
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 07:40:06PM +0800, Eric Liu wrote:
> To be honest, I don't really know clientgen.c. I just see there is a
> 2ms there. And I try it and see if I am lucky. Obviously, I am not.
>
> My issue is still server side. In case that VFS_CLOSE operation takes
> longer time than 20
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 06:47 -0700, Zane Zakraisek wrote:
> I created a test domain on a Samba 4.0.0 machine, and added a Server 2008
> R2 server. I joined it as a domain controller and DNS server. I've noticed
> that records that I create on one server aren't being replicated to the
> other. I expe
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 16:54 +0100, andreas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we, a public hospital, would like to migrate to samba4 from our samba3.x
> environment. According to the documentation samba4 does use a internal ldap
> server.
>
> We use openLDAP as directory for
> samba
> horde
> Oracle name res
Volker,
To be honest, I don't really know clientgen.c. I just see there is a
2ms there. And I try it and see if I am lucky. Obviously, I am not.
My issue is still server side. In case that VFS_CLOSE operation takes
longer time than 20s, Samba server shall loads a new module. I don't want
that
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 06:44:56PM +0800, Eric Liu wrote:
> Hi Folk,
>
> Note, I am using Samba 3.5.10. I have tried to change
> source3\libsmb\clientgen.c line 591. But it does not work.
> cli->timeout = 2 * 360; /* was 2, Timeout in in
> milliseconds. */
clientgen.c is a client
Hi Folk,
Note, I am using Samba 3.5.10. I have tried to change
source3\libsmb\clientgen.c line 591. But it does not work.
cli->timeout = 2 * 360; /* was 2, Timeout in in
milliseconds. */
Thanks
Eric
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Eric Liu wrote:
> Hi Folk,
>
> I am writing a
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 06:36:58PM +0800, Eric Liu wrote:
> I am writing a Samba VFS module. The VFS CLOSE operation takes a longer
> time, much greater than 20s, to return. Looks this will cause Samba client
> server communication timeout. And Samba will load a new module, which is
> not what I wa
Hi Folk,
I am writing a Samba VFS module. The VFS CLOSE operation takes a longer
time, much greater than 20s, to return. Looks this will cause Samba client
server communication timeout. And Samba will load a new module, which is
not what I want. I want Samba to wait, until VFS CLOSE operation fini
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 08:57:24PM +, Bjoren Davis wrote:
> Hello Samba folks,
> I have come across a problem with smbclient 3.5.6 when I use the tar 'x'
> feature.
> Pathnames that work out to be 100 characters long are extracted incorrectly:
> bash-3.2$ tar tvf ugh.tar
> -rw-r--r-- bdavis/Do
Hi,
I made a mistake, we have Samba 3.5.3.
Can somebody help ?
Regards,
Romain
2012/12/13 Romain
> Hello samba list,
>
> I'm close to be able to make this work but I just need a bit help. Here is
> the situation:
>
> - Windows 2008 R2 x64 Domain Controller: domain ES01
>
> - Samba 3.4.3 Domai
Do let us know if you have any remaining issues.
Andrew Bartlett
It look like everything works ok. Will see dns in few days. GPO, login
scripts work, so useres don't even notice change!
Good work!
Szymon
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions:
25 matches
Mail list logo
