On Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Matthieu Patou wrote:
> On 12/30/2012 07:10 PM, Achim Gottinger wrote:
>
>> As you have noticed, we are very good at adding DNS records, but never
>>> remove the old ones. What you have done seems reasonable, if you have
>>> renamed the site, removing the remain
Jeremy Allison samba.org> writes:
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:24:04PM -0600, Steve Tice wrote:
> > Can anybody provide the expected response to an SMB2 CREATE request that
> > includes ACCESS_SYSTEM_SECURITY in the DesiredAccess mask? I’m particularly
> > interested in cases where the SMB cli
Hi Andrew,
thanks for your response. I am trying to look into this issue better.
Regrettably, I've never taken the time to learn to use the packet
tracer. Need to do this someday. But maybe we can muddle through without it.
THEORY:
DNS is not right somehow.
I am using the internal samba DNS s
Hi guys
I have a problem with Samba 4.0 shares covered by scannedonly VFS. Example
configuration of one of those shares:
path = /foo/bar/baz
read only = No
browseable = No
vfs objects = scannedonly
scannedonly:domain_socket = True
scannedonly:socketname = /var/lib/scannedonly/scan
From: "Michael B. Trausch"
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 11:33:44 -0500
> On 12/20/2012 10:05 AM, Bruno MACADRE wrote:
>> If I copy this file in command line the mode is 660 as expected, If I
>> want to simulate the file explorer behaviour I must do a 'cp
>> --preserve=mode' copy.
>>
>> Is there a
> From: Andrew Bartlett [mailto:abart...@samba.org]
>
> No, you shouldn't need to add DNS information manually. The
> samba_dnsupdate script should run once Samba starts and handle all this.
>
Ok. The wiki says to check DNS first (well, that's how I read it), I'll try it
again without adding a
On Mon, 2012-12-31 at 05:34 +, Justin Clacherty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fantastic that Samba 4.0 has been released, I've just installed and joined it
> to an existing AD (single Win2k8R2 server running Exchange). The
> installation seemed to go well but I'm seeing odd messages when I show the
> r
