This is the result when deleting the vfs-glusterfs.c and then running make:#
Project rules pass
Waf: Leaving directory `/root/samba4/samba-master/bin'
source not found: 'vfs_glusterfs.c' in
'dir:///root/samba4/samba-master/source3/modules'
make: *** [all] Fehler 1
I am afraid there is more to do
Cy Mike wrote:
> Hi everyone. I'm looking to solve an issue with Samba on a NAS being
> accessed with TreeSize Pro. Using that program to scan through millions of
> files is eating up memory on swap and eventually crashing the system.
---
Which system is crashing? the NAS or the one running th
Dear all,
to your notice:Samba 4.1 pulled from git will not compile under CentOs 6.4
if Glusterfs 3.4 is installed from epel-repo.
Make will die with an error concerning "vfs modul glusterfs".
There should be more documentation about the "vfs modul glusterfs".
Daniel
Hello Dewayne,
Am 24.07.2013 01:59, schrieb Dewayne Geraghty:
> Where you mention in the document PDC role, do you mean
> PdcEmulationMasterRole, or is there some other meaning?
Yes. I thought the DC with the FSMO role "PDC" would be a good choice to
be the "Master", because some Microsoft tool
Add more memory or split the volume into smaller shares.
Gc
Cy Mike wrote:
>Hi everyone. I'm looking to solve an issue with Samba on a NAS being
>accessed with TreeSize Pro. Using that program to scan through millions of
>files is eating up memory on swap and eventually crashing the system. It'
Hi everyone. I'm looking to solve an issue with Samba on a NAS being
accessed with TreeSize Pro. Using that program to scan through millions of
files is eating up memory on swap and eventually crashing the system. It's
scanning mounted CIFS shares on the NAS running TrueNAS with samba version
3.6.9
Ever since upgrading from Fedora 17 to Fedora 19, which included moving from
Samba 3.* to 4.*, I've had issues opening files from a Windows Command Prompt.
I can open files fine from an Explorer window, but if I drop down to a Command
Prompt and type a file name, that no longer opens the file. I'
Hi.
I'm trying to convert from s3 to s4 using classic upgrade. I have LDAP
backend and i'm getting this error:
Ignoring group 'pgrd' S-1-5-21-511255529-1355219746-1726288727-3007 listed
but then not found: Unable to enumerate group members,
(-1073741596,NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_DB_CORRUPTION)
The pro
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 23:21 +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> On 23/07/13 17:10, Rowland Penny wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
>
> >
> > But if the group identified by primaryGroupID 513 has gidNumber 20513
> > (which would be in my opinion best practice) without looking in the
> > source code of ss
On 23/07/13 17:10, Rowland Penny wrote:
[SNIP]
But if the group identified by primaryGroupID 513 has gidNumber 20513
(which would be in my opinion best practice) without looking in the
source code of sssd you don't know whether sssd took the gidNumber of
the user or took the pr
On 23 July 2013 21:37, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
> > On 22 July 2013 22:01, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
> > second-existing-dc# samba-tool fsmo seize --role=rid
> > Attempting transfer...
> > FSMO transfer of 'rid' role successful
> > ERROR: Failed to initiate role seize of 'rid' role: objectclass: modi
Hello,
as it is often a question here on the lists and by many others on the
internet, I wrote a new HowTo for setting up a SysVol replication
"workaround", until Samba supports this feature by itself:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/SysVol_Replication
For the replication process, I wrote a
I have upgraded my Samba3+LDAP system to Samba 4 following the instructions
given here:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/samba-tool/domain/classicupgrade/HOWTO
I did this on a test server (so I also moved the ldap database, installed
openldap, etc).
The installation passes all the sim
On 07/23/2013 03:37 PM, Garth Keesler wrote:
On 07/23/2013 02:54 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 06:49 -0500, Garth Keesler wrote:
All,
I've posted a few times about this but without response so it seems
that
not many folks are trying to do this. So, before I spend many mor
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 09:46 -0700, Scott Goodwin wrote:
> What I'm trying to avoid is having to physically set up a test network that
> is completely isolated from our live samba3 network, in order to test
> everything out. If I can run them both on the same network, it would be so
> much easier
On 07/23/2013 02:54 PM, Andrew Bartlett wrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 06:49 -0500, Garth Keesler wrote:
All,
I've posted a few times about this but without response so it seems that
not many folks are trying to do this. So, before I spend many more hours
on this trying to make it work, a simple
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 20:38 +0100, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In time honoured fashion I am replying to my own post, as I think I have
> figured out a workaround to my issue. Hopefully this will help others -
> here's what I did.
>
> On 22 July 2013 22:01, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
>
> > Now
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 06:49 -0500, Garth Keesler wrote:
> All,
>
> I've posted a few times about this but without response so it seems that
> not many folks are trying to do this. So, before I spend many more hours
> on this trying to make it work, a simple yes or no question:
>
> Has anyone su
Hi,
In time honoured fashion I am replying to my own post, as I think I have
figured out a workaround to my issue. Hopefully this will help others -
here's what I did.
On 22 July 2013 22:01, Jonathan Hunter wrote:
> Now, I try to join the new server (CentOS 6.4 clean install; Samba 4.0.7
> from
With relation to this page:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/samba-tool/domain/classicupgrade/HOWTO
I would like to upgrade to samba4 on a new server, but would like to test
it all out before finalizing the switch.
My question is, can I copy over my tdb and smb.conf files (as mentioned in
th
>
> Hello list.
>
> If I query my samba4 Active Directory domain with dig mydomain ANY or MX
> it answers just with SOA and NS records, but not MX or some others I have
> already defined. Is it right??
>
> I've tried from the own samba4 server and from another linux host.
>
> My samba4 is up-to-dat
On 23 July 2013 16:44, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> You don't seem to have taken on board that primaryGroupID is a numerical
> identifier for an actual group. Now why Microsoft didn't use the group's
> SID I have not the faintest idea.
>
> I suppose that you have noticed that the primaryGroupID is t
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 16:44 +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 15:23 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > If you want my opinion and you probably don't, people need to stop
> > thinking NT server if they connect to a samba4 AD server and start
> > thinking AD server, t
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 15:04 +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 14:39 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> > Could this be yet another reason to use sssd instead of winbind?
> >
> > sssd does use the account gidNumber
> >
> > testuser
> >
> > primaryGroupID: 513
> > uidNumber: 300110
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 15:23 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
>
> On 23 July 2013 15:04, Jonathan Buzzard
> wrote:
> Not what I said. The primaryGroupID is an identifier for a
> group in AD,
> bit like a SID is (I don't get that either). So primaryGroupID
> 513 might
>
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 14:53 +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
>
> What gets me is people claiming that half a dozen lines of configuration
> in smb.conf is more complicated than 30+ lines of configuration in an
> entirely separate configuration file in addition to several lines in
> smb.conf. It mig
Hallo, Jonathan,
Du meintest am 23.07.13:
>> Why use a word like orthogonal?
> Orthogonal is a single word, is precise and describes what is
> required exactly.
Sorry - "that depends".
I know this word as a synonym of "rectangular", and I mostly know it in
a geometrical environment.
90 degre
On 23 July 2013 15:04, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> Not what I said. The primaryGroupID is an identifier for a group in AD,
> bit like a SID is (I don't get that either). So primaryGroupID 513 might
> refer to a group called sambausers, which has a it's own set of
> RFC2307bis attributes which inclu
On 23 July 2013 14:53, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> Orthogonal is a single word, is precise and describes what is required
> exactly. It has been in my vocabulary for approaching 30 years. None
> overlapping range is three words and more characters as well. I was not
> aware that Newspeak was now a
Volker Lendecke wrote on 07/23/2013 02:15:03
AM:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:43:21PM -0500, John P Janosik wrote:
> > I'm working on building a CTDB/Samba cluster on AIX 7.1 with the
latest
> > levels to replace an older one running CTDB 1.0.113 and Samba 3.6.1. I
> > have the new servers up
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 14:39 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> Could this be yet another reason to use sssd instead of winbind?
>
> sssd does use the account gidNumber
>
> testuser
>
> primaryGroupID: 513
> uidNumber: 3001106
> gidNumber: 20513
>
> getent passwd testuser
> testuser:*:3001106:20513:t
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 14:20 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
> OK, the documentation is better but people still get it wrong probably
> because it is more complex than it needs to be, I personally find it
> easier to set sssd up, but that is just me.
>
> Why use a word like orthogonal?, just who knows
Could this be yet another reason to use sssd instead of winbind?
sssd does use the account gidNumber
testuser
primaryGroupID: 513
uidNumber: 3001106
gidNumber: 20513
getent passwd testuser
testuser:*:3001106:20513:testuser:/home/DOMAIN/testuser:/bin/bash
Rowland
On 23 July 2013 13:54, Jonath
OK, the documentation is better but people still get it wrong probably
because it is more complex than it needs to be, I personally find it easier
to set sssd up, but that is just me.
Why use a word like orthogonal?, just who knows what orthogonal means, I
have only being speaking english for 56 y
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 11:25 +0200, steve wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 10:05 +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
>
> >
> > It's probably still not working for him because he needs to clear the
> > now poluted cache/database that winbind has created from previous
> > attempts. Using net cache flush mi
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 11:55 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> I thought that testparm did exactly that, it tested all the parameters
> in smb.conf, so if the ranges overlap, it should report the error.
>
You thought wrong then. It tests to see if they are valid so 1000-akjf
is in
Hallo,
I'm new here. Doing compilation of Samba 4.0.7 on Debian Wheezy
accordingly to Samba Wiki page. I have used configure parameters
--enable-debug --enable-selftest and after make, I ran make test.
Now I'm puzzled, because it apparently stops at step 96 (after 15
minutes, CPU still running at
All,
I've posted a few times about this but without response so it seems that
not many folks are trying to do this. So, before I spend many more hours
on this trying to make it work, a simple yes or no question:
Has anyone successfully demoted a Win 2003 PDC without error after
joining a Sam
On 23 July 2013 11:40, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 11:06 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
>
> [SNIP]
>
> >
> > OK, I see where you are coming from, but until testparm starts saying
> > 'this will not work because' people will keep on having problems with
> > winbind, also why do yo
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 11:06 +0100, Rowland Penny wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> OK, I see where you are coming from, but until testparm starts saying
> 'this will not work because' people will keep on having problems with
> winbind, also why do you need to set up the ranges anyway.
testparm does not guarant
On 23 July 2013 10:05, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
> This is where Matthew went wrong, it's right there in the man page
> (unlike three years ago). There are also a large smattering of posts
> from myself on this list over the last two years on how important it is
> not to have overlapping ranges for
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 11:25 +0200, steve wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 10:05 +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
>
> >
> > It's probably still not working for him because he needs to clear the
> > now poluted cache/database that winbind has created from previous
> > attempts. Using net cache flush mi
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 10:05 +0100, Jonathan Buzzard wrote:
>
> It's probably still not working for him because he needs to clear the
> now poluted cache/database that winbind has created from previous
> attempts. Using net cache flush might work. Personally I would stop
> samba delete the tdb fil
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 10:15 +0200, steve wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> +1
> sssd just works: there is plain English documentation available and you
> get rfc2307 out of the box. The same day;)
>
> otoh, if you must stick with winbind there are reports of success here.
> Just one more thought to bugzilla it
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 09:40 +0200, L.P.H. van Belle wrote:
> Hai,
>
>
> I'm having exactly the same problem with winbind as Matthew Daubenspeck.
> also on ubuntu 12.04 with sernet packages. ( used sernet-samba-winbind 4.0.7 )
>
> I remove the complete config atm but am at the point reinstallin
Hai,
I'm having exactly the same problem with winbind as Matthew Daubenspeck.
also on ubuntu 12.04 with sernet packages. ( used sernet-samba-winbind 4.0.7 )
I remove the complete config atm but am at the point reinstalling now.
I'll wait with that until you put you howto on.
i cant loose the
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:43:21PM -0500, John P Janosik wrote:
> I'm working on building a CTDB/Samba cluster on AIX 7.1 with the latest
> levels to replace an older one running CTDB 1.0.113 and Samba 3.6.1. I
> have the new servers up and running and they seem to work, but I'm worried
> about
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 11:54 +0100, Edward Robbins wrote:
> Hello,
> I would like to build samba at different optimisation levels with debug
> symbols, in order to test a static analysis tool I have developed. I have
> found the configure option "--enable-developer", which I presume enables
> debug
48 matches
Mail list logo
