Al 27/08/13 01:52, En/na Marc Muehlfeld ha escrit:
Am 27.08.2013 01:19, schrieb Luca Olivetti:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Local_user_management_and_authentication/nslcd
Yep, I only had to comment the map group uniqueMember member line,
though (migrated) groups show the members fine.
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 01:39 +0200, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Hello Steve,
thanks for your suggestions.
Am 27.08.2013 00:40, schrieb steve:
1. Nested groups work fine with nslcd. Please use the latest version:
man nslcd.conf(5)
I use the version Redhat ships. I haven't used that
Al 27/08/13 01:46, En/na Marc Muehlfeld ha escrit:
Am 27.08.2013 01:13, schrieb Luca Olivetti:
In ADUC on Win7 the tab should be there (on XP you need to install
something additionally if I remember right).
Ah, OK, I'm on XP and I installed the tools here:
Am 27.08.2013 10:38, schrieb Luca Olivetti:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/921913/en
Thank you, I was missing idmu.exe
Now I can see the unix tab, but, whenever I click accept, it tells me
Unable to modify the object property values. Check your credentials.
There could be a network problem.
Am 27.08.2013 10:11, schrieb steve:
Your distro must be still using the 0.7 series.
Yes. RHEL ships 0.7.5.
I had a short search for 0.8 and it seems that since that, some
comfortable changes where done for AD.
If I have time tonight, I'll compile the latest version and try to find
out
Al 27/08/13 10:45, En/na Marc Muehlfeld ha escrit:
Am 27.08.2013 10:38, schrieb Luca Olivetti:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/921913/en
Thank you, I was missing idmu.exe
Now I can see the unix tab, but, whenever I click accept, it tells me
Unable to modify the object property values.
Hello,
i am using samba 4.0.8 with integrated DNS. Now i notice a wrong DNS
entry of the PDC.
ip addr (GGG for security ;-):
br0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP mtu 1500
inet6 2GGG:::G::/64 scope global
inet6 fe80::225:90ff:fe77:18e4/64 scope link
# ./samba-tool dns query PDC
Any ideas on how to get replication working correctly? I'd demote/delete
ncssamba2 but samba-tool fails and ADUC won't let me either. Is there some way
to get a more informative message than WERR_INVALID_PARAM?
Sincerely,
Dave Hopkins
- Original Message -
I checked and the ping
Text:
The problem occurs on any excel file that this especific user try to change.
Environment:
- XLS file saved on the samba server and then opened from the same server.
- User Machine has windows XP and Office 2007. It happens on office 2010 too.
-When the user goes clicking SAVE few times on
Hi Luca,
If you provisioned your domain with --use-rfc2307, then in Win7 ADUC you
can see the posixAccount (UNIX Attributes) of the users.
2013/8/27 Luca Olivetti l...@wetron.es
Al 27/08/13 10:45, En/na Marc Muehlfeld ha escrit:
Am 27.08.2013 10:38, schrieb Luca Olivetti:
Hello,
i have an issue with existing installation of samba4 domain controller
that is specific to dns managment.
In the domain I have two samba4 4.0.7 and one windows 2003 server that I
plug periodically to manage the dns.
All fsmo roles are transfered to samba.
All aspects of the domain
Hello,
i have an issue with existing installation of samba4 domain controller
that is specific to dns managment.
In the domain I have two samba4 4.0.7 and one windows 2003 server that I
plug periodically to manage the dns.
All fsmo roles are transfered to samba.
All aspects of the domain work
Al 27/08/13 16:56, En/na Bruno Vane ha escrit:
Hi Luca,
If you provisioned your domain with --use-rfc2307, then in Win7 ADUC
you can see the posixAccount (UNIX Attributes) of the users.
I did a classicupgrade, not a provisioning, and I can see the unix
attributes of the migrated users, the
Hi all,
I'm using samba4 as DC and using ssh/nslcd/pam in some machines to lookup
ldap base in samba4 to allow access for users.
My question is, how can I set the default GID os users to 100, to match
the GID of groupusers in my linux machines? All users I create with ADUC
is getting UID 513.
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 12:14 -0300, Bruno Vane wrote:
Hi all,
I'm using samba4 as DC and using ssh/nslcd/pam in some machines to lookup
ldap base in samba4 to allow access for users.
My question is, how can I set the default GID os users to 100, to match
the GID of groupusers in my linux
This issue has been discussed at length before with no resolution to my
knowledge. If you use samba-tool drs showrepl, you will probably
notice that Forest and Domain DNS is not being replicated to/from all
DCs. Additionally, if you use Win2003 DNS MMC, you will not be able to
detect that DNS
Thanks for such quick reply,
I have just executed samba-tool drs showrepl command and it seems that
Forest and Domain LDAP DIT are being replicated successfully.
But I still doubt that it can not be fixed since all RR records that are
added to w2k3 server are successfully propagated and
Hello,
I start a new thread, because the other one meanwhile drifted far away
from what the OP asked. :-)
Am 27.08.2013 17:02, schrieb Luca Olivetti:
If you provisioned your domain with --use-rfc2307, then in
Win7 ADUC you can see the posixAccount (UNIX Attributes) of
the users.
I did a
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 14:33 -0300, Bruno Vane wrote:
Hi Steve,
I did what you said, and when create the user, nothing changes:
Hi
Sorry, you have to add:
gidNumber: 100
to the DN of each user too.
Make sure that you clear the nscd cache after making any change to AD.
Steve
--
To
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 20:11 +0200, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Do posixAccount/posixGroup
objectClasses have to be there normally?
No. With the AD schema, you can use all of rfc2307 without the need for
the objectclassed which define them. Just add the attributes.
HTH
Steve
--
To unsubscribe
Interesting. Are Forest and Domain records being replicated in both
directions from all DCs? It always worked from the WinDC to the S4DC but
not in the other direction. Also, were you able to use the WIN DNS MMC
to examine the DNS records on any of the Samba DCs? If so, you are
probably close
Al 27/08/13 20:46, En/na steve ha escrit:
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 20:11 +0200, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Do posixAccount/posixGroup
objectClasses have to be there normally?
No. With the AD schema, you can use all of rfc2307 without the need for
the objectclassed which define them. Just add the
Well that's the thing, I can only replicate DNS changes from WinDC to
Samba, but not in other way.
I can't even update DNS records on Samba side, only on Windows side.
I managed to figure out an error on Samba caused by RPC call:
dnsserver: Found DNS zone .
Failed to find DNS Zones in
Hi Steve,
Seems that this attribute does not matter, see my user bruno.vane:
primaryGroupID: 513
gidNumber: 100
If I try to change the value of primaryGroupID I get an error:
Using:
root@samba:~# ldbedit -e vim --url=/usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb
samaccountname=bruno.vane
failed to modify
Unfortunate since that's exactly what I saw. I've no answers but I will
keep watch in hope that you have better luck solving it than I did.
See ya...
Garth
On 08/27/2013 02:00 PM, Antun Horvat wrote:
Well that's the thing, I can only replicate DNS changes from WinDC to
Samba, but not in other
On 27/08/13 19:56, Luca Olivetti wrote:
Al 27/08/13 20:46, En/na steve ha escrit:
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 20:11 +0200, Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
Do posixAccount/posixGroup
objectClasses have to be there normally?
No. With the AD schema, you can use all of rfc2307 without the need for
the
If you set it up with '--use-rfc2307', nslcd needs configured as though it is
talking to an SFU 3.5 DC. The RFC 2307bis attributes never add additional
classes to the AD member objects, even in an SFU environment.
--
Gary L. Greene, Jr.
Sr. Systems Administrator
IT Operations
Minerva Networks,
Al 27/08/13 23:56, En/na Gary Greene ha escrit:
If you set it up with '--use-rfc2307', nslcd needs configured as though it is
talking to an SFU 3.5 DC. The RFC 2307bis attributes never add additional
classes to the AD member objects, even in an SFU environment.
Thank you, that gave me an
The branch, v4-1-test has been updated
via 6b6cab7 Fix bug #10063 - source3/lib/util.c:1493 leaking memory w/
pam_winbind.so / winbind
from c41ffd5 ntdbtool.8.xml: Bump version up to 4.1.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-1-test
- Log
The branch, v4-0-test has been updated
via 1787174 Fix bug #10063 - source3/lib/util.c:1493 leaking memory w/
pam_winbind.so / winbind
from 16e6631 s3-winbindd: fix fallback to ncacn_np in cm_connect_lsat().
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=v4-0-test
- Log
The autobuild test system has detected an intermittent failing test in
the current master tree.
The autobuild log of the failure is available here:
http://git.samba.org/autobuild.flakey/2013-08-27-1351/flakey.log
The samba3 build logs are available here:
The branch, master has been updated
via 323cccd smbd: Use #defines in smb2_getinfo_send
from d1593a2 Fix the UNIX extensions CHOWN calls to use FCHOWN if
available, else LCHOWN.
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=shortlog;h=master
- Log
The branch, master has been updated
via 617c647 Fix valgrind errors with memmove and talloc pools.
via cbfc3ef Add simple limited pool tests to test_memlimit().
via 3d0f717 Remove talloc_memlimit_update(). No longer used.
via 8e2a543 Inside _talloc_realloc(), keep
33 matches
Mail list logo
